Please explain 2. Normalization - Up to 3rd normal form. You need to show the process ofnormalization.Show functional dependency a-b.No need to include instances in your relations.STIDLName FName38249 Brown38249 BrownThomas82453GreenSally82453 Green SallySally82453GreenThomasPhoneNo StLic111-7804 FL111-7804 FL391-1689 AL391-1689 AL391-1689 ALLicNo Ticket# Date CodeBRY123BRY123TRE141TRE141TRE-141156341601714987162931789210/17/10 211/13/10 110/05/10 311/18/10 112/13/10 2Fine$25$15$100$15$25

To normalize the given relation up to the 3rd normal form, let's first identify the functional…

2. Normalization - Up to 3rd normal form. You need to show the process of normalization. Show functional dependency a-b. No need to include instances in your relations. STID 38249 38249 Brown Green 82453 Green 82453 Green LName FName Brown Thomas 82453 Thomas Sally Sally Sally Phone No St Lic 111-7804 FL 111-7804 FL 391-1689 AL 391-1689 AL 391-1689 AL LicNo BRY 123 BRY 123 TRE 141 TRE 141 TRE- 141 Ticket# Date Code 15634 16017 14987 16293 17892 10/17/10 2 11/13/10 1 10/05/10 3 11/18/10 1 12/13/10 2 Fine $25 $15 $100 $15 $25

2. Normalization - Up to 3rd normal form. You need to show the process of normalization. Show functional dependency a-b. No need to include instances in your relations. STID 38249 38249 Brown Green 82453 Green 82453 Green LName FName Brown Thomas 82453 Thomas Sally Sally Sally Phone No St Lic 111-7804 FL 111-7804 FL 391-1689 AL 391-1689 AL 391-1689 AL LicNo BRY 123 BRY 123 TRE 141 TRE 141 TRE- 141 Ticket# Date Code 15634 16017 14987 16293 17892 10/17/10 2 11/13/10 1 10/05/10 3 11/18/10 1 12/13/10 2 Fine $25 $15 $100 $15 $25

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the relation instance and functional dependencies below. Which of these FDs hold on the instance and which do not? A BC 2 4 АВ — С A → B A → C В > с АС — В ВС — А 3 4 В > А C → A C → B 1 3 5 2 4
Here's a relation (R), its attributes and its functional dependencies (F): R(A, B, C, D, E, F, G) BC -> DG CD -> F FG -> A 1. compute the closure of {ACD}+ 2. compute the closure of {F}+ 3. what are the keys of R?
Suppose RR is a relation with attributes A1,A2,…,AnA1,A2,…,An. How many superkeys will RR have if a) The only candidate key is A1A1. b) The only candidate keys are A1A2A1A2 and A1A3A1A3.
Consider the following set F of functional dependencies on the relation schema (А, В, С, D, E, G): А— ВCD ВС — DE В — D D → A
Consider the relation schema R=VWXYZ, with the set of functional dependencies F = {VW->XY, V>X, W->Z, YZ->Z, Z→V} A. Give three independent reasons why the following table cannot possibly be a legal instance of R. V W X Y v1 w1 х1 yl z1 v2 w1 x2 y2 z1 v2 w2 x1 y2 z2 B. Show the functional dependencies that hold on each of R1=VWX and R2=WYZ. You do not need to show trivial functional dependencies, or those implied by others in the same set, but you must show all others. C. Is the decomposition of R into R1=VWX and R2=WYZ lossless-join? Why or why not?
Constructing a link such as second course may be done by starting with a number of connections that are many to one in nature. Does the limitation on the relation's many-to-one cardinality get enforced by both the main key constraint and the foreign key constraint? What leads you to believe that is the case?
Explain functional dependency between the primary key and a nonkey attri -bute via another non-key attribute?
Suppose relations R(A,B) and S(B,C,D) are as follows: 3 5 A 1 R B 6 2 4 4 6 8 9 C 5 7 c. The full outer join has 3 NULLs. d. The left outer join has 4 NULLS. S A Compute the full outer join on B, the left outer join on B, and the right outer join on B. In each case, R is the left operand and S is the right operand. Then, answer the following questions for each of the three resu How many rows are there in the result? 2 How many NULL's appear in the result? Finally, find the correct statement in the list below. O a. The right outer join has 2 rows. Ob. The right outer join has no NULLS. D 1 2 3
A decomposition of a relation R into Rị and R2 is dependency preserving, if - (a) R can be reproduced by natural join of R1 and R2 (i.e, by R1 ¤R2). (b) All the functional dependencies can be checked without computing R1 ¤R2. (c) R¡NR2 forms a super key for either R1 or R2. (d) All of them.
Select all binary relation properties that apply to the following relation: Equal magnitude: |x| = lyl O antisymmetric O reflexive O symmetric O transitive
Consider the relation schema R=VWXYZ, with the set of functional dependencies F = {VW->XY, V->X, W->Z, YZ→Z, Z->V} А. Give three independent reasons why the following table cannot possibly be a legal instance of R. V W Z yl x2 X Y v1 w1 х1 z1 _y2 x1 v2 w1 z1 v2 w2 y2 z2
Suppose relation R(A, B) has 2 tuples and S(C, D, E) has 3 tuples. What can we say about the possible number of tuples in their old-style join without join condition?