1(a)lf we allow for the possibility of satiation, the consumer's budget constraint takes the formpxS pw, Walrus' law then becomes pz(p) s0 for all p2 0. Show that the standard textbook proof of the existence ofWalrasian equilibrium still applies for this generalized form of Walrus' law.

The Walrus Law highlights a situation where there is an excess supply in one of the markets, which…

1(a)if we allow for the possibility of satiation, the consumer's budget constraint takes the form pxs pw, Walrus' law then becomes pz(p) so for all p2 0. Show that the standard textbook proof of the existence of Walrasian equilibrium still applies for this generalized form of Walrus' law.

1(a)if we allow for the possibility of satiation, the consumer's budget constraint takes the form pxs pw, Walrus' law then becomes pz(p) so for all p2 0. Show that the standard textbook proof of the existence of Walrasian equilibrium still applies for this generalized form of Walrus' law.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

5.6. Bunde's preferences are given by the utility function u(x1, x2) = x1 + X2. For each of the following cases, decompose the price effects into the substitution and income effects using either the Hicks-Allen or Slutsky decompositions. - (a) Suppose m = 120, p₁ = 12, and p2 P1 5, keeping p2 and m fixed. (b) Suppose m = 100, P1 = 20. The price p₁ then falls to = 20, and p2 = 10. The price p₁ then falls to 5, keeping p2 and m fixed.
Ngan's preferences over Coffee (C) and Redbull (R) are given by U(C, R) = aC + a²R Ngan's income is given by M and prices are given by PC and PR. Assuming Ngan is maximizing her utility, under which condition will she only consume coffee? (i.e. C* - M Pc Po PR and R* = PR > PC Pc = aPR Pc PR > a ay 0)
Explain why the lifetime budget constraint must be satisfied as a strict equality
3. Consider the following utility function: X2 if: 1 2 u(x1, x2) X1 if: 1< x2 < 2 X2 + x1 otherwise Answer the following questions. (a) What is the Walrasian demand for this utility function?
Suppose that you want to derive and draw the demand function for Mr. Seong (also known as Player 456). Mr. Seong likes to eat Dalgona Candy (D) and drink Soju (S). Suppose Mr. Seong's preferences can be expressed as U(D,S) = (D)º.² · (S)0.8. Suppose further the price of a Dalgona Candy is 2 (pº = 2) and the price of Soju is 4 (ps = 4). Mr. Seong has a budget of 100 to spend on the two goods. A. Use the substitution method to find Mr. Seong's optimal choice of Dalgona Candy and Soju. B. Use any method to find Mr. Seong's optimal choice of Dalgona Candy and Soju if the price of Soju was 5 (instead of 4). Feel free to use the Cobb-Douglas short-cut method if you want. C. Use your answers to A and B to derive the demand for Soju in the two diagrams below. That is, draw the change in the top diagram and then use your result to derive the demand curve in the bottom diagram. Several hints have been drawn in the diagram below. D 50 10 ps 5 4 20 20 25 S FYI: The Cobb-Douglas short-cut can be…
1(a)lf we allow for the possibility of satiation, the consumer's budget constraint takes the form pxs pw, Walrus' law then becomes pz(p) so for all p2 0. Show that the standard textbook proof of the existence of Walrasian equilibrium still applies for this generalized form of Walrus' law.
Question 8 Note: This question is similar to end-of-chapter problem 3.2 and it is restated here in a multiple choice format. For a utility function for two goods to be strictly quasi-concave (i.e. convex indifference curves), the following condition must hold: UxxU²x - 2UxyUxUy + UyU² 0: the function is strictly quasi- concave. O Because all of the first order partial derivatives are positive, we must only check the second order partial derivatives. Uxx, Uyy, Uxy > 0: the function is not necessarily strictly quasi-concave. Because all of the first order partial derivatives are positive, we must only check the second order partial derivatives. Uxx = Uyy = 0, Uxy > 0: the function is strictly quasi- concave. O Because all of the first order partial derivatives are positive, we must only check the second order partial derivatives. Uxx = Uyy = 0, Uxy < 0: the function is not strictly quasi-concave. Question 10 Note: This question is similar to end-of-chapter problem 3.5a and it is…
Suppose an individual has the following utility function: U(X,Y)= min{X, 2Y}, and they choose marshallian demands gx,gy. Suppose you have an increase in px. Which of the following is true about the change in demand for good X, gx? (a) No substitution effect, because they only consume one of the goods. (b) No substitution effect, because they always consume the goods in fixed proportion. (c) No income effect, because they only consume one of the goods. (d) No income effect, because they always consume the goods in fixed proportion. Which of the following production functions exhibits constant returns to scale? (a) f(k,l) = 0.310.7 (b) f(k, l) = kl (c) f(k, 1) = ln(k)+ln(1) (d) f(k, l) In(k) + In(1) =
Suppose that consumer has the following utility function: U(X,Y) - X1/2y1/4. Suppose also that P 2, P -3 and 1=144. What would be the optimal consumption of X and Y at the equilibrium. respectively? 36, 24 12,40 24,32 48.16
Assume that a∈[-1,1] and θ∈(0,2). The utility function is given by u(a,θ)=a(θ-1). Which of the following action is never optimal ex-post? a. 0 b. All can be optimal ex-post c. 1 d. -1
i. Write down the Lagrangian form and solve the utility maximization problem. ii. Assume that the income increases from 100 to $101. What is the increase in the optimal value of u(x,y)?
Sean and Yvette Durand live in Detroit and enjoy going out to fancy restaurants for dinner and to diners for breakfast. On the following diagram, the purple curves ₁ and 12 represent two of their indifference curves for fancy dinners and diner breakfasts. They have $1,000 per month available to spend on eating out. The price of a diner breakfast is always $10. Each labeled point represents the tangency between a budget constraint and the corresponding indifference curve. N ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ DINER BREAKFASTS 0 5 6 M BC₁ 8 FANCY DINNERS H BC2