
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question

Transcribed Image Text:1. Consider an economy where the production function takes the form Y =
z(N + K), where N is labor and K is capital. K is exogenous and fixed at
the level Ko: K = Ko. The total time endowment of the consumer in this
economy is h, so N + 1 = h, where is leisure. The consumer has preferences
over consumption and leisure that can be represented by convex indifference
curves. The government in this economy has spending/consumption G, fixed
exogenously. Assume that zK₁ > G. Also assume that the first welfare theorem
holds for this economy.
1) On the graph draw the PPF (aggregate resource constraint) for this econ-
omy. Make sure to label axes and the points of intersection of PPF with both
axes. If the PPF has a kink you should clearly mark the x- and y-coordinates of
the kink. (Recall, leisure should be on the horizon axis and consumption on the
vertical axis). On the same graph show where is the competitive equilibrium
for this economy (denote it A).
2) Assume now that the total factor productivity increases to the new level
Znew. On the same graph, draw the new PPF for this economy. Make sure
to label the points of the intersection of the new PPF with both axes. If the
new PPF has a kink you should clearly mark the x- and y-coordinates of the
kink. On the same graph, show where is the new competitive equilibrium for
this economy (denote it B). What will happen to the consumption in the new
equilibrium (increases/decreases)? Provide intuition.
3) Reproduce the original graph from part 1) of the problem. Make sure
to place point A (competitive equilibrium) on the graph. Assume now that
the government consumption G increases to the new level Gnew. Assume that
zKo Gnew. On the same graph, draw the new PPF for this economy. Make
sure to label the points of the intersection of the new PPF with both axes. If
the new PPF has a kink you should clearly mark the x- and y-coordinates of
the kink. On the same graph show where is the new competitive equilibrium
for this economy (denote it D). What will happen to the consumption in the
new equilibrium (increases/decreases)? Provide intuition.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 4 steps with 6 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Let's incorporate the labor-leisure trade-off and capital income taxes in the two-period model. Let c₁, c₂ be consumption in two periods, I the number of hours worked, Te Te the proportional taxes on consumption in 2 periods, s the saving rate, w the wage rate, b pension in the 2nd period, and 7, the tax on savings (capital income tax). The household's maximization problem in this case is: given by maxe₁,e2,8,1-1 log(c₁) + log (1-1)+5log (c₂) such that (1+T₂) C₁+8 = (1-7)wl and (1+T₂)C₂ = [1+r(1-Ts)]s+b, where measures how the household values leisure vis-a-vis consumption.arrow_forwardAssume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. Derive and plot the feasible set, between daily values of consumption c, and “leisure”, l. Label the values at the intercepts (the points where the feasible frontier cuts the two axes).arrow_forward2. The standard model of consumer behavior assumes that income is exogenous. Of course, a person's income usually depends upon the number of hours the individual works. Suppose that an individual has T hours each day which can be allocated toward working time, H, or leisure time, L-that is, T = H + L. The individual earns w dollars for each hour worked. Then the individual's income is M + wH where M denotes any non-labor income. The individual has preferences over leisure time, L, and a consumption good, X, which can be represented by a quasi-concave utility function, U(X, L). The consumption good, X, can be purchased at the price Px. The individual seeks to maximize the utility subject to the constraints on time and money. (1) Formulate the individual's problem as an optimization problem with two constraints a time constraint and a money constraint. Derive the first-order conditions. Give an economic interpretation of the Lagrange multipliers. (2) The two-constraints problem can be…arrow_forward
- a) A planner in a small, open economy has a utility function U = x1X2 and production takes place according to the production functions Y1 = 10L, – 0.5L Y2 = 10L2 – L The world prices of the goods are p1 10 and p2 5. The total amount of labour %| %3D available in the economy is 5 units. (i) Formulate the Lagrange equation. (ii) Write down the Karush-Khun-Tucker conditions. (iii) Determine a possible solution.arrow_forward11. A worker derives utility from consumption, C and leisure, L U = U(C, L) and initially faces the constraints p.C = N+w.H H = 24 - L where p is the nominal price of consumption, N> 0 is unearned income, w is the nominal wage and H is hours worked. (a) Derive the budget constraint in terms of C and L and show on a diagram an initial optimal choice of C and L, in which both are positive. (b) State this equilibrium algebraically, and briefly explain how it can be derived. (c) Show that, assuming normality of leisure, for some value N*, if N> N*, the individual will choose not to work. Is the initial level of N in your answers to parts a) and b) greater or less than N*?arrow_forward3. Consider a parent who is altruistic towards her child, but also cares about her own consumption. The parent's utility over her own consumption and that of her child is up = log(co) +a log(ci) where c is the child's consumption, and a > 0 is the degree of parental altruism. Suppose that the parent can invest in the child's human capital by spending money (e) on her education; education generates human capital h /() and human capital is paid at rate w. The parent has a total income of (a) Write down an expression for the child's future consumption in terms of the parent's choice of e. (b) Now write down the Lagrangian for the parent's decision problem.arrow_forward
- Consider a model in which individuals live for two periods and have utility functions of the form U = In(C1) + In(C2). They earn income of $100 in the first period and save S to finance consumption in the second period. The interest rate, r, is 10%. 1. Set up the individual's lifetime utility maximization problem. Solve for the optimal C1, C2, and S. (Hint: Rewrite C2 in terms of income, C1, and r.) Draw a graph showing the opportunity set. (5 marks) 2. The government imposes a 20% tax on labor income. Solve for the new optimal levels of C1, C2, and S. Explain any differences between the new level of savings and the level in part (a), paying attention to any income and substitution effects. 3. Instead of the labor income tax, the government imposes a 20% tax on interest income. Solve for the new optimal levels of C1, C2, and S. (Hint: What is the new after tax interest rate?) Explain any differences between the new level of savings and the level in a, paying attention to any income…arrow_forwardAnswer please with added diagrams b) Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves. c) Use indifference curves and the feasible set to show why, given the properties of the optimal choice in part b it is not optimal to work, say, 10, or 6 hours per day.arrow_forwardquestion iiarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education