Question 1 (25 marks) Several accounting standards include ceiling tests (also called impairment tests). Required: a. What is a ceiling test? Identify two IASB accounting standards that contain a ceiling test and describe the test. (7 marks) The ceiling test is an accounting standard that stipulates that capital assets such as property, plant and equipment must be written down if their net carrying value exceeds the net recoverable amount. This is to prevent overvaluation of capital assets. b. Ceiling tests are usually regarded in this course as one-sided examples of the measurement approach. However, they can also be regarded as examples of conservative accounting, as assets are written down but not written up. Ceiling tests are …show more content…
This accounting is considered conservative and it is done this way since some company can mark up numbers or simply make up non-existent numbers to enhance the financial statements. Question 2 (25 marks) Most firms hedge at least some of their risks. Hedging can take two basic forms—namely, natural hedging and hedging by means of derivative instruments. The use of derivatives as hedges has expanded greatly in recent years. Generally, under accounting standards (IAS 39 and related U.S. standards), derivative instruments are fair-valued with any unrealized gain or loss included in net income. However, hedge accounting provides some exceptions to this rule. Required: a. A firm has a large amount of long-term debt (valued on a cost basis) and decides to set up a natural hedge of this debt. However, a natural hedge can lead to excess net income volatility—that is, net income volatility greater than the actual volatility of the firm’s operations. Explain how this can happen. (5 marks) This can happen in the case of mismatch. It happens when some assets or liabilities are fair valued but connected liabilities or assets are not fair valued. When firms hold long-term debt with fixed interest rates and may also hold fixed interest bearing securities of similar amount and maturity. If the interest rates vary the fair value of the interest bearing securities will also vary in the
B. Acid Test Ratio: Determining the volume of short-term assets to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory is the purpose for the Acid Test Ratio. Numbers below 1 could mean liabilities cannot be paid. A dive from 0.64
Also a sales type lease must involve a dealer or manufacturer’s profit or loss. This exists if the assets fair value at inception of the lease differs from the cost or carrying value.
Based on the 1988 Supreme Court case of Corn Product Refining Co. v. Commissioner (350 U.S. 46; 76 S.Ct. 20; 100 L.Ed. 29), hedging transactions were determined to be used to support business practices of certain commodities. Such hedging transactions are normal for businesses engaged in commodity sales such as coal or corn to protect against market
Mr. Lee and the other executives expect to generate a higher profit from hedging since they have majority of their personal wealth invested into the firm. The focus of any hedging program should always be to minimize the firm’s risk of loss, but that does not mean the they will
Please complete the following 7 exercises below in either Excel or a word document (but must be single document). You must show your work where appropriate (leaving the calculations within Excel cells is acceptable). Save the document, and submit it in the appropriate week using the Assignment Submission button.
ACC 201 (Principles of Financial Accounting) Complete Class All Discussion Questions , Chapters Problems and Assignments
Over the past several years, there has been a growing controversy over the accounting issues of fair values and historical cost. The basis of this controversy revolves around which one of these principles is the most accurate. There are many different viewpoints on this issue. Many accounting professionals believe that fair value is just as accurate as the historical cost principle, while others believe that the historical cost is more reliable. The facts about each of these valuation methods will be researched and explained throughout this research document, as well as the different viewpoint about which method is the most accurate and reliable.
Similar to those which use Level 1 inputs, several of the above items are measured using both level 2 and level 3 information (JPMorgan Chase, 2013).
According to this concept the asset is recorded in the books of accounts at the price paid for it and not at its market value. For example: if a business entity purchases a building valued at $15 million from a friend for $12 million, this asset would be recorded at $12 million and not at $ 15 million, because for the business entity the cost was $12 million and not $15 million.
IFRS 13 provides a principles-based framework for measuring fair value in IFRS. This is based on a number of key concepts including unit of account; exit price; valuation premise; highest and best use; principal market; market participant assumptions and the fair value hierarchy. Fair value is an important measurement on the basis of financial reporting. It provides information about what an entity might realize if it sold an asset or might pay to transfer a liability. In recent years, the use of fair value as a measurement basis for financial reporting has been expanded. Determining fair value often requires a variety of assumptions as well as significant judgment. Thus, investors desire timely and
ACC307 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT TASK 1: Contemporary Issues of Accounting Theory Fair Value Measurement Overview After the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) released the IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement in May 2011 for the purpose of completing its joint project with the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on fair value, the Australian Accounting Standard Board (AASB) released the Australian equivalent - AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement in the September of the same year. This standard permitted early adoption but generally started to take effect for the financial reporting periods beginning from 1 January 2013. This new standard requires no new requirement for the adoption and but it was accompanied with the issuing of AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the AASB 13 which has made consequential changes to 32 standards and 9 interpretations for the adoption in Australia. The new standard attempts to unify IFRS and US GAAP by specifying how entities should apply the fair value measurements that applied in previous IFRS standards. It clarifies and redefines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date”, sometimes referred to as an “exit price”. It also sets out a single source guidance for a robust measurement framework to ensure that the requirements are applied consistently and have clear
In Note 1 of the footnotes, which is the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies section in the use of estimates subsection, Pinnacle expressed the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which requires management to make estimations and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. However, the actual results could differ from those estimates due to an overestimation or an underestimation. More times than not, a mathematical equation is used to determine an estimation but estimations are not always right, they are supposed to provide a roundabout number. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, determination of any impairment of intangible assets and the valuation of deferred tax assets. (Pinnacle Financial 2017).
During the last 30 years, derivatives have become increasingly important and widely used in the field of finance all around the world. Their increasing values made them impossible to be ignored because they have become much bigger than the stock market when measured in terms of underlying assets in so much that Global corporations and financial intermediaries trade billions of dollars of derivative contracts on a daily basis across a range of products and markets (Batten and Wagner, 2012).