Often times when you think of the word “Zen” the Zen Japanese gardens, mediation, and or happiness might come to mind. “The essence of Zen is attempting to understand the meaning of life directly, without being misled by logical thought or language.” (BBC) Zen Buddhism comes from the Mahayana branch of Buddhism. While it shares some underlining similarities between the two major schools in Buddhism that are Mahayana and Theravada, as in reaching Nirvana as the ultimate goal, it has different history and teachings as well as its own two branches, Soto Zen and Rinzai Zen.
Zen Buddhism or known as Ch’an originated from Indian Mahayana Buddhism with Taoism infused into it, where is has traveled to Korea and Japan. When searching for the history and who started or transferred Zen Buddhism, I got a lot of different answers, time periods, and events. According to BBC, Zen Buddhism started out in India and was brought to China in the sixth century by an Indian monk named Bodhidharma. While Britannica states that Zen Buddhism was in
…show more content…
This is a common belief in Buddishm that having material possession leads to suffering. Zen also has monks and nuns like the Theravada practice. Women have the right to become nuns just as much as men have the right to become monks. Perhaps the biggest similarity in Buddhism is the Buddha. The Buddha is seen as the perfect being that has reached enlightenment. While the way to reach enlightenment in Zen is by mediating the two schools of Zen Buddhism have slightly different views on how and when you reach it. In Theravada Buddhism the path is much stricter saying that only monks and nuns can achieve it compared to Mahayana where everyone has the chance to become enlightened and to reach nirvana. While there are differences between the schools a lot of the core concepts remain the same in all schools, but the practices and teachings vary from school to
A Japanese philosopher we have studies extensively is Dogen. He is a 13th century Japanese’s Buddhist priest who founded the Sōtō School of Zen in Japan. Dogen focused on the importance of the sitting meditation of zazen as a method of achieving Zen and enlightenment though not thinking/ thinking beyond. Dogen’s ideas differed to that of the Sixth Patriarch in The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch. This Buddhist script that was composed in China during the 8th to 13th century focused on teachings and stories of śīla (conduct), dhyāna (meditation) and prajñā (wisdom). The interesting points of discussion between these two different approaches to Zen teaching are the Buddha nature, method of attaining enlightenment, self and other,
The Sangha, the Buddhist monastic order, comprises Bhikku (monks), Bhikkuni (nuns), laymen, and laywomen. While the Bhikku and Bhikkuni depend upon the laywomen and men for economic support, the lay community depends on them for spiritual guidance and ritualistic practices. This well-rounded mutual relationship is clearly a division not only amongst religious status, but determined by gender as well. This is quite a contradiction with the Buddhist belief that your physical self is impermanent and ultimately attachment to your illusory self will cause you suffering. The second Noble Truth states that suffering originates from our ongoing desire, a clinging to possessions, attachments, and self. Why would a religion founded in the idea of shedding attachment focus so much on gender, which is an attachment? I feel that the Buddha’s hesitation in allowing women to be initially recognized in the Sangha originates from his early childhood convictions of women, fear of the Dharma becoming further compromised, and ultimately leading to the deterioration of Buddhism altogether. The Buddha’s hesitations regarding women becoming monastics seem to be questionable because of the way women have responded to this discrimination even during the Buddha’s lifetime. These women are evidently devoted to the ideals and teachings of Buddhism because of their ability to shed attachments and embody a fully monastic lifestyle. As they are shedding their attachments they give up their gender.
Zen Buddhism did not vocally voice that they did not want to associate their religion with
The two types of Buddhism were Zen, and Amida. Amida Buddhists believed in a place called “The Pure Land” which was paradise. They believed they could get to this paradise by saying Amida’s name. Zen Buddhists had a lot of discipline, which made it common for the Samurais. They would meditate for long periods of time, and believed this would help them seek enlightenment.
The topic of Zen Buddhism and understanding how it fits into a framework that was designed to
Buddhism was founded by Prince Siddharta Gautama also known as Buddha around the 6th century BCE in India. After he saw the suffering in the outside world he left his palace to seek answers and became the enlightened one teaching about the dharma in the rest of his life. Today it has around ~350million followers. It doesn’t fit exactly into the term as a religion as it also has philosophy teachings (Brodd 145).
It's all well and good to explain Zen Buddhist doctrine, but Zen is a much more abstract idea. A British researcher and Buddhist, Christmas Humphreys, says it is hard to relate Zen within time and space also, “[f]or Zen is not a new thing but a new way of looking at things. It is a new vision with the old eyes.” (Humphreys 99) Zen is best seen through the actions of those who practice for those who wish to gain a basic understanding, and Matthew is my nearest and dearest example of a practicing Buddhist.
Daoism aimed for unity with the Way and Zen Buddhism strived for enlightenment, but both of these goals required one to surpass ties to the individual self. Daoism advocated freedom from bonds of Di, which required turning your back on the true state of affairs and forgetting what you were born with (Zhuang Zi, PAGE). In order to do so, one had to empty their mind as an inner cultivation method to make a lodging place for the Way. Zen is defined as the Buddha mind, which “designates at once the ultimate reality or “emptiness” of all things and the enlightened state, or knowledge of that reality, characteristic of a Buddha” (A Discussion of the Seated Zen, 148). Emptiness was a recurring theme in both of these religions, which demonstrated that although they supported various means of cultivating the individual mind, they ultimately strived towards a common
Zen, also known as Ch’an Buddhism in China, is a school of Mahayana Buddhism that was established in China about 1500 years ago. Zen is a form of religious practice of mainly concentrating the mind to a single point in which then results in self-realization and/or enlightenment. Zen philosophy is interpreted that all humans are capable of reaching enlightenment, which is generally blocked by ignorance. The idea emphasizes enlightened masters over forms of scriptures, and is the least “academic” of all the Buddhist schools.
The status of 'the feminine' in Buddhism is one of the most controversial and ambiguous issues in religious studies. On one hand, Buddhism is a religion founded on non-differentiation. One of the goals of meditation is to view all things dispassionately, without becoming attached to the notion of things as good or bad. Material existence, including the body (whether it is male or female) is inherently impermanent. "The issue of women's religious statuses and roles remains more ambiguous and controversial in Buddhism than it is for other world religion… some suggest that the core of Buddhist tenets contains egalitarian…feminist (Gross 1993) tendencies, others point out the perpetuation of male dominance and patriarchy in Buddhist thought…described by a variety of terms, including 'androgyny' 'institutional androcentrism' 'asceticm isogyny,' and 'soteriological inclusiveness." In other words, the ideal of ascetic renunciation of the world is interpreted as a renunciation of the pleasures of the body which includes women. Women are viewed as 'less than' men and more inexorably tied to the material world no matter how fervent their commitment to Buddhism.
The aspiration of all sentient beings is to reach enlightenment; to realize their Buddha-nature and ascend to Buddhahood. The path and method to reach enlightenment, however, differs depending on the perspective from which one views Buddhism. Dogen, in his teachings on Zen Buddhism, promotes the practice of zazen to reach enlightenment. Shinran and the Pure Land sect are devoted to Amida Buddha, who they believe will bring them to the Pure Land, and enlightenment. The ways espoused by Dogen and Shinran are similar in some aspects, but differing enough in others to warrant the separate sects of Buddhism in Japan. For the purposes of this examination, the two sects can be summarized by how they look at reaching enlightenment: Zen Buddhism focuses inwardly, while Pure Land focuses outwardly. By examining their own words on how one is to reach enlightenment, the similarities and differences in their methods can be seen, allowing a better understanding of the teachings of their respective sects.
However, it is far from being the only links that one can make between Zen and Pure Land Buddhism. Indeed, most features of the path and the characteristics of enlightenment in Zen have a similar counterpart in Pure Land Buddhism. First of all, and perhaps most flagrantly, conventional teachings are also eschewed in favor of less conventional means in Pure Land Buddhism. Just like Zen, in order to attain spiritual realizations (in Pure Land’s case, shinjin), mind training is necessary. The practice prescribed is extremely similar to Zen. Instead of a “live word”, Pure Land practitioners constantly repeat a phrase (this practice is called nembutsu) for months, years or even decades. Eventually, the repetition becomes automatic, going as far as doing “nembutsu while yawning” (Li, Apr 4., 2016). Just like Zen’s kensho, it is at this point that the Pure Land practitioner can reach shinjin. In Pure Land Buddhism, the realizations also transcend simple logic and reason: “it is not merely belief as intellectual assent, but strong, inner conviction” (Bloom 1999, 230). Because realizations transcend conventional thinking, conventional knowledge is also seen as detrimental in Pure Land Buddhism: “Recognition of our ignorance is connected with our becoming truthful. Since we can become united with each other in truthfulness, ‘genuine trust’ or spiritual oneness is actually truthfulness” (Maida 1989, 32). Also like Zen, spiritual realizations are sudden and not gradual: “Shinran’s teaching is absolute Other Power and transcending or immediate (ocho)” (Bloom 1999, 231). Finally, the traditional monastic practices and rules are also disregarded in favor of a lay life. This is due to another inversion from Shinran. Traditionally, Pure Land Buddhism was regarded as the easy and inferior way for people who couldn’t engage in more serious and demanding practice. However, Shinran, because
Instead of seeing a "soul" or a "mind" as the seat of personal identity, in Buddhism, the self is to be found in processes. Meditation, then, has the therapeutic effect of disengaging the practitioner from self-consciousness, freeing the mind. The view of the world without the construct of a permanent essence enables one to "experience reality as it really is" (3). It is important to note that Buddhism does not distinguish mental processes from other senses. Just as seeing takes a visual object, the mind takes a mental object (1). Just as the eye is free to take in different visual objects, the mind is free, as well. While meditation aims to develop "single-pointedness of mind," it is ultimately to free it from external objects. The focus is on the process of breathing, in Zen, and, eventually, one can reach a state where one is not considering anything (2). Zen considers the "blank-mind" stage to be a higher form of consciousness because it is free from attachments.
Michael Kampan O' Reilly states in Art Beyond the West that Zen Buddhism teaches one can find
Buddhism originated from India, and was founded by Prince Siddharta Gautama, who later came to be known as Buddha, or the enlightened one. Born of a princely caste, he later renounced his comfortable life in search for nirvana. In order to do that, he joined a band of ascetic, who was a group of Hindu priests.