Zarahemla Rhetorical Analysis

The guidelines that Redish puts forth in her book can definitely be shown throughout the article you reference from Bon Appétit. I especially liked how the author writes in a familiar language and uses popular references like that of Beyoncé or #obsessed. Redish writes, “[w]riting can have character and flavor and still be clear” (4062). It certainly goes a long way in making the piece of writing on whole more sociable and user-friendly. The author has clearly gone to the extra effort of matching her tone to what she perceives as the persona of the reader/user. Because of this, the article is a great intro piece to invite customers to explore more of the website or, like you mentioned, find the perfect 2017 cookbook. Likewise, Food52.com

In Randa Jarrar’s essay Why I can’t stand white belly dancers she bluntly addresses the predicament of cultural appropriation. Jarrar’s main purpose is to inform her audience on appropriation, whether it’s done oblivious or uncaring of the situation. There are many ways she presents the situation, the tone she takes on to convey the problem is unsympathetic and transparent.

Thank you for reaching out. Hope you're doing well today. I'm happy to assist you with your concern regarding with the payment.

Jeyarsi, I definitely agree with your points and enjoyed your examples. I think corporations are projecting more progressive images and ideas in order to appeal with a more progressive audience – Millennials. Majority of people growing up with advertising and exposure to the media do not have strict liberal views compared to 50 years ago. It gets controversial because then the audience starts to question the authenticity of the programming. An example that I personally found shocking was that on the television show “the bachelor and the bachelorette” as they have not had a heteronormative lead until 2017. In recent months they announced that they will have the first ever African American Bachelorette. I find it suspicious that it took many

Katz uses emotional appeals to help strengthen his argument. Katz is very up front with his words, giving him a commanding attitude towards reform. Most people would not talk about abused children, but he does this to make the audience want to change what is going on because children are valued in our

Zadeh is an immigrant from Urmia Iran, plagued by the injustices and maddening systems of American immigration policies. In addition, once he does eventually get into the country, the blockades to starting up his business have no interest in easing off. By exposing these malpractices to a larger audience, Zadeh wants to convince readers that immigration policies are more of a hindrance than a help. Zadeh’s main rhetoric use is pathos, and his emotional ties to his experience gives the reader a very clear and thoughtful description of the horrors of immigration. However, he doesn’t shy away from other appeals, he makes sure to back up his claims with facts given by very credible sources and personal involvement. Since he is a co founder/CEO

What does this passage mean to you? (You do not need to use textual evidence in this response. Make sure to RESTATE the question and respond to it completely). Answer :

In his seminal work “The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano,” Equiano delves into his personal experiences as a slave, illuminating the brutal and dehumanizing realities of slavery and igniting a fervent call for its abolition. With his goal in mind, he strategically employs a multitude of rhetorical devices to evoke a powerful emotional response. Equiano combines emotional appeals, ethos and credibility, and logical arguments to strengthen his call to action, effectively condemn slavery, and advocate for human equality. Equiano’s narrative skillfully intertwined his personal journey with the broader narrative of slavery’s brutality, effectively harnessing the power of personal experience to evoke empathy and emotional resonance in his intended audience. One of the most striking aspects

In Rachel Buchan's article titled "Who killed Kalief Browder", she grabs the attention of the readers by the opening paragraph describing the date and cause of death of Kalief Browder. He was a 16-year-old, African American male, who was wrongfully accused of stealing a backpack while on his way home from a party. He was taken to one of the nations cruelest Penitentiary for three years.There he was mentally and physically abused- then placed in solitary confinement so he can reflect on his actions. After he served for three years, when he was released he wasn't the same anymore. He was struggling with mental issues that he decisded to take his life anf hang homself .

Unlike Mythology, narratives of the Bible are actual events that took place dating back to the beginning of time. The conception of The Holy Bible’s compilation started thousands of years ago in the land of Egypt. Initially, the Old Testament Scriptures were written in the Hebrew language, however, they were later translated to the Greek. At the onset of the New Testament writings, they were originally recorded in the Greek language. Forty men transcribed the voice of God, which resulted in sixty-six books of the Holy Bible. The Holy Scriptures explained the creations, formation of the world, God, God’s chosen people, sin, and the plan of salvation as well.

"Quickly bring the finest robe and put it on him; put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet.

“The realm wanted to defeat the Seven Deadly Sins and I wanted to see Ban Destroyed,” King stated. “We had mutual interests for a while, but that’s no longer the case.”

Now Joseph Smith tells us that God will provide three witnesses whom God will show these things, meaning the golden plates. Yet, Martin Harris clearly states he was not shown them except in his imagination (spiritual eyes) and confirmed that this was the case also with Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer. So isn’t the testimony of the three witnesses invalid? And God is specific in his revelation to Joseph Smith when he states: And to none else will I grant this power, to receive this same testimony among this generation D&C 5:11 Also in the Book of Mormon 1830 ed.

asked him to give them the knowledge that he has obtained and been revealed to

The passages presented are divisive in the way that they are interpreted. They create a debate as to who is the “real Jews,” and those that believe that they are the real Jews claiming authority over others. This view includes self-identifying Christians claiming that they are the ones that are the “favoured by God.” The various passages presented allow for this interpretation.