preview

Yalom And Leszcz Summary

Decent Essays

Yalom and Leszcz explains “The primary sweeping objection to therapist transparency emanates from the traditional analytic belief that the paramount therapeutic factor is the resolution of client-therapist transference (, 2005, pg. 218). I believe there is some truth to this if the therapist starts to become to transparent. I believe the therapist should be relatable because as a therapist you do not want to make your groups members alienated. If the group leader place themselves above the group, the therapeutic process would be negatively impacted. A group leader/therapist should be self-aware of the amount of personal information he/she provides but at the same time they can allow themselves to be relatable. I continue to use the word relatable because in my experience a personal relatable story can increase the rapport. …show more content…

Yalom & Leszcz states “Therapist help clients confirm or disconfirm their impressions of the therapists by gradually revealing more of themselves. The client is pressed to deal with the therapist as a real person in the here-and-now (2005, pg. 214). This is where self-awareness comes into play because as a group leader or therapist there are boundaries you should not cross ethical and morally for the sake of the therapeutic process. When considering how much to self-disclose or when is a right time to self-disclose. The reading expressed “ask yourself where the group is now. Is it a concealed, overly cautious group that may profit from a leader who models personal self-disclosure? Or has it already established vigorous self-disclosure norms and is in need of other kids of assistance? (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005, pg.

Get Access