In the Hebrew Bible, due to its anthological nature, there are a wide variety of viewpoints that are expressed from different periods of time. While some books have mainly a negative view on foreign nations and peoples, there are a few that are somewhat positive. The books of Joshua, Jonah, and Esther all illustrate distinct perspectives and approaches that the Israelites had to people of foreign nations, which help to create an overall picture of the different beliefs that the various authors of the Hebrew Bible carried. In the book of Joshua and previously, the people of Israel are told to remove all of the people that are in the land that God had given them. They are not to leave even one person alive, because Yahweh wanted only His people …show more content…
This can be seen in that, after finding out that Esther was a Jew, the king did not kill her. In Esther, Haman had planned to kill all of the Jews in Persia, and after this plan was revealed to Xerxes at the second dinner party, he ordered that Haman be killed and proceeded to appoint Mordecai, another Jew and Esther’s cousin, as the prime minister. In Jonah, Yahweh has mercy on the people of Nineveh after they repent of their sins. This particular point serves as irony, in that Jonah as one of Yahweh’s people disobeyed, while the people of the foreign land obeyed, which serves to put a more positive view of the foreigners to those that read the book. In differences, though, the most obvious is between the book of Joshua and the books of Jonah and Esther. Joshua paints all foreigners are bad and that they should all be eradicated, but Jonah and Esther paint foreigners in a somewhat better light. In Jonah, the Gentiles obeyed Yahweh, when the Israelites didn’t. In Esther, the guy that wants to destroy all the Israelites is killed and illustrated to be a bad guy, while other people that weren’t Israelites were against the man’s idea to do so. In both of these circumstances, Gentiles are viewed in much better ways that in
Roman slavery was a complex institute with great diversity, and while some aspects of it were comparable to American slavery, limiting it to these comparisons would be inaccurate. Nonetheless, Kubrick’s Spartacus chooses to emphasize the aspects that were comparable to American slavery in order to comment on the Civil Rights Movement of the time. At the same time, the gladiators represent ideals that would be associated with communism at the time this movie was released, and the positive portrayal of the communal aspects of this slave society also offers commentary on McCarthyism.
Other than considering the matter of genres, the differences of culture and language should also be part of the element we should think of when we discover the truth of the Bible. Different cultures will cause different understanding of the Bible. Placher uses the example of Thucydides that “keeping as closely as possible to the general sense of the words that were actually used” was “called for by each situation (Placher 12).” in this example, situation can be realized as someone’s own view imposed to the text, according to the culture or experience he goes through. Placher argues that if a biblical author writes in a attitude of culture which is different from the readers’ attitude, then he or she writes as the products of such a culture. Like what the author says, “to treat them as having an attitude to history different from what they do is not to interpret them with maximum accuracy, but to get them wrong (Placher 16). ” Moreover, the confusion of reading the Bible, which is originated in a culture different from ours, happens when there are different social conditions that give different meanings. The author gives an example of the slavery in ancient Israel and the slavery in the American South. He says that the slaves in ancient Israel are supposed to be free at the end of seven days, and their identity of slave is not based on race. However, the slavery in American, on the contrary, differs from the one in the Bible. In addition, the author talks about homosexuality. He claims that in ancient Israel, two men cannot love each other, for that is an abomination, and they will be condemned. However, in modern society, even if people do not follow the Bible, that is they love each other, they seldom be condemned. In brief, the author claims that understanding the genres, recognizing the attitudes toward the reporting of historical details, and considering the social context in
In Israel and Judah warfare would be an integral part for the Jewish to reclaim their homelands. With warfare came several brutalities that would be illustrated in the book of Deuteronomy and Joshua. In the book of Deuteronomy, it describes the killings of entire populations in Gad after their capture, plunder the towns, and took whatever resources they had. This was all done with the support of God. In the book of Joshua, has the theme of rule and capture. It describes the brutalities that took place in capturing Jericho. Joshua would commit atrocities that involved exterminating everything in the city by sword. Both books, highlights the atrocities needed to reclaim their holy land. There is no evidence that there is any regulation on their warfare. Soon Israel would be taken over by the
The prophet Jonah was an angry, hateful man who lived in eighth century B.C. During the reign of King Jeroboam II, he was commission by God to go to Nineveh and tell them to repent of their wicked ways. While it is not known, who wrote the book of Jonah is it widely believed to be have been penned by the prophet himself. The passage I have chosen takes place after the people of Nineveh repent and God has shown compassion for them. Jonah is stubbornly angry at God’s compassion and leaves Nineveh. The passage picks up with Jonah sulking on a hill overlooking the city.
The books of both Joshua and Judges provide an oversight into conquest and occupation of the Promised Land. Initially, when God promised Abraham land for he and his descendants it seems all that is required of the Israelites is to comply with the covenant (Tullock & McEntire, 2012, p. 96).
When studying any piece of literature there are many different methods and techniques that can be used. The Bible, in specific, is often referred to as a source of moral code, hope, and answers to social, ethical, and political questions. However, this incredibly influential book can also be read as if it were any other novel. The events, settings, and characters can all be evaluated for what they are, forgetting the notion that they are from a religious text. This approach is called narrative criticism. When regarding to the Bible in this way, we do not need to know any historical information or focus on seeking a deeper theological meaning. Instead, the stories are evaluated in terms of how
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks’s book Not in God’s Name provided an interesting way at looking at characters in the Bible in a different light. Sacks feels that reading the Bible literally can cause many problems since people are not gaining everything that is truly meant from the text. Literal readings can become dangerous since people are not really understanding the messages from the stories. They are seeing the violence and the favoritism, and that is what can lead to antisemitism and other hate groups. Sacks proposes ways of reading biblical stories in an unconventional way that paints those displaced at the heroes. The main point of the book is that love is particularly, and you can choose how much you love someone, but justice is impartial, and everyone deserves to be treated equally.
2. Background and Introduction: Jonah was instructed by God to go to Nineveh and preach the message of repentance to them.
In Chapter 16 of The Gospel of Matthew, the dynamics of Simon and Jesus’ relationship quickly change. Peter says, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God” (Mt.16.16) and Jesus replies, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah!” (Mt.16.17) but then Peter rebukes him soon after and Jesus says, “Get behind me, Satan!” (Mt.16.23)
“Israel’s Bible begins with an extended look at the world prior to Israel instead of assuming that the world began when it came to be.” “Gen 2-9 is introduced by Gen 1 and carried forward by Gen 10-11. Gen 1-11 then is a single story, an unusually sustained “philosophical” and “theological” explanation,” explaining our relationship with God, our flaws and destiny and religious institutions.
In addition to the Pentateuch, the Old Testament books of the Deuteronomistic history reveal the theme of God’s faithfulness to his followers. Initial examples are found in the conquest of the Promised Land depicted in the book of Joshua. Throughout the Israelite campaign to oust natives and settle the land, God’s actions demonstrate his faithfulness. In one instance God uses Rahab to hide Israelite spies, while in several other situations he allows the Israelites to defeat its foes. From these actions, it is clear that God remained faithful to his promise with Abraham (to provide his descendents with land). In addition to Joshua, the book of Judges provides an example of God’s faithfulness. Throughout the book, Israel repeatedly is unfaithful to God and is conquered by foreign powers. In response to Israelite cries for help, God repeatedly raises up
God chose the nation of Israel as an act of Sovereign Grace. God did not choose them because they deserved it or because they were special group of people but simple because of His sovereign Grace. (Routledge page 261). God selects prophets to warn His people of their fate if they continue to stray away from God. The pre-exilic prophets warned the Israelite nation of their impending judgement due to their apostasy (Routledge, page 263). Amos prophecies to the Northern Kingdom and warns them of the disaster coming because of their social sins of oppression and corrupt justice (Routledge, page 264).
To speak of the Hebrew Scripture is to speak of story, a story stretching from the very beginning of time to only a few centuries before the beginning of the Common Era. It is to speak of richness of content, of purpose and of reality and to engross oneself in an overarching narrative that, depending on your personal convictions, continues to the present day. Within this richness is found a wide variety of different events and experience, told through a series of genre ranging from foundational myth to apocalypse, law giving to poetry, genealogy to wisdom and many more. Within this diversity however, three broad sections can be discerned that speak to a shared purpose and content, these are the sections of Law, Prophecy and Writings. It
In general, the healthcare system has been faced by a lot of trends, which have left the healthcare providers with less option but to move in haste to accommodate the trends in their day-to-day activities. All aspects of the healthcare system have been affected, and this paper reveals specific trends in long-term care and health promotion.