Would He Have a Job? Essays

The employees being laid off are major stakeholders as their means of living in jeopardy. In addition, as a result of the layoffs, the local economy will be effected. The culture of inclusiveness was one of the things that attracted Dennis to the company and the layoffs could seriously damage the institutions culture (Gentile, 2009).

The effect of mismanaged LAYOFFs on the remaining workforce and the effects, lack of management preparation, the human condition, and lack of mitigation strategies. We think that the problem with this article is that not enough managers or HR personal, know how to let a person go from their employment effectively. They sometimes don't realize the impact that it has on the other employees morals. Also, that sometimes companies don't take a closer look to make sure downsizing will be the answer to cutting costs like they think that it will. Every HR or manager should be let go in their lifetime so

Need, in order to succeed, of a reduction of the labor force, which potentially can cause reputational damage and lower employee morale for the new company.

In this simulation exercise I will be discussing about the companies starting layoffs. The situation below will be highlighting the perspective of employees who are working in an environment where people are being focused to leave their jobs for company’s benefit. Company’s inability to afford the employees, start of new venture or change in management can be the reason behind layoff.

Opposition from Unions in different subsidiaries against the layoff could cause serious problems like high severance package and possible strikes

The author of this report is asked to answer to five major questions as it relates to layoffs at companies including how they affect people and how they should be handled from a procedural and logical standpoint. In order, the author will suggest three ways a manager can cope with executing and undergoing a layoff, will list a step-by-step process for conducting the dismissal meeting, will determine the compensation that will be provided to the departing employees, will show a chart showing the disbursement schedule and structure for the aforementioned severance payouts and finally predict three ways in which the layoffs will affect the remaining employees and the company itself going forward.

Employees will be able to cope with layoffs as the management has provided prior necessary information such as sharing of market data and competitive information. All information should be made available to the workers instead of the management, acting as if all things are ok. Offer information as it is instead of sparing the staffs the bad news. Most employees want the bad news first rather than explaining to them issues about competition, market forces, or the financial environment (Rothaermel, 2015). The organization should not delegate the pain in the human resource office; instead, all managers should be mandated to handle the situation as most employees are loyal to their managers first then the company. The managers will be able to deliver the information in person. This will create a sense of respect to the

Because of the hasty decision to implement the change there is a very high risk of employee resistance to change. The upper management had no investment in the decision and will feel a resentment and lack of control that could trickle down through the organization. The dangers her are that original companies will become infected with a negative attitude toward the new parent company causing

Else could have reduced the salary for all the employees for few months and this could have motivated the employees to work more to increase productivity and to save their jobs. So proper procedures to downsize with fairness all around or other plans could have been ideal instead of discriminating and ending up in a legal suit spending more money than saving any.

Challenges faced by HR management when significant staff cutbacks occur and how they should be addressed

A critical factor to the success of any company is its ability to attract top talent while retaining those already working within the company. Losing employees can have a significant impact on a company’s morale, productivity and overall profit.

The downsizing of a company can affect employees before, during and after it occurs. Employees usually know of a possible downsizing, care of the almighty grapevine, months before it is supposed to happen. Thus, employees may become paranoid and self-absorbed, and their top priority is their own career rather than the bottom line of their employer. This causes them to be unfocused and prevents them from performing their jobs efficiently. Many workers would also be perfectly willing to stab their peers in the back in hopes of keeping their job. Usually when a downsizing is complete, the company is at an all-time low. This is due to the fact that in almost every merger, acquisition or downsize, employees are faced with uncertainty about their jobs before and after the restructure. After a large percentage of downsizes, ten percent of the remaining workforce will easily adapt to the change, while another ten percent will never adapt. Workers who survive the downsize often have feelings of anger, fear or distrust. Further internal problems result from employees who survive with the company, but cannot adapt to their new settings and expectations, and eventually quit their job.

If it has to be a mass layoff, then this needs to be categorised by employee job title, the time the employee had been with the organisation and the salary structure the employees fall under. These will indicate the type of package, if any, that each person will receive as part of the downsizing. Once this is considered and decision had been made, a plan needs to be formulated and time of downsizing needs to be determined. Secondly, addressing the staff about the downsizing is also very important as it should not come as a surprise to employees. This helps to iron out any concerns or questions that employees may have in regards to the downsizing. Usually the employees will be in a state of shock when they hear the news so if they are in a state not to ask questions, the management should offer information such

     Downsizing has become a significant idea in today's economy and maintaining the trust of employees when something like this takes place has also become very serious business (Brockner, Konovsky, Cooper-Schneider, Folger, Martin, & Bies, 1994). The question is not whether a company should downsize their employees but how to do the downsizing properly so that as few employees as possible are injured (Brockner, Konovsky, Cooper-Schneider, Folger, Martin, & Bies, 1994). There are several ways that companies can downsize that will help retain much of the loyalty of the workers that remain (Brockner, Konovsky, Cooper-Schneider, Folger, Martin,

When organizational changes are announced, particularly when there is downsizing involved, employees generally divide into one of two groups: those who will attempt to control their fate and those who want to get out before the changes occur. The group taking control will usually dig in, increase their productivity, hit their deadlines and do everything they can to shine in front of their managers hoping they will sail through the changes with their job intact. The remaining employees cope with the changes by avoiding them. You may see these employees taking longer lunch hours, coming in later and leaving earlier or simply not