preview

William David Ross: Prima Facie Duty

Decent Essays

According to William David Ross, there are distinct “prima facie” duties that people can make reference to for guidance when trying to resolve moral dilemmas in life in order to decide the best solution. They are prima facie because they can be overridden. His theory isn’t subjective but Ross believed there was an objective fact of the matter to help you decide what to do. Certain circumstances or features of the conflict decide what one must do after all things are considered. Your judgment really is the only method one has because there is no super principle that helps to justify moral rules and no central intrinsic good stating the plurality of basic intrinsic goods. Nothing is fixed or set in stone because duties can conflict. His rules …show more content…

Consider the competing merits and use aesthetic judgment. An example of this would be if I had the opportunity to hold onto a promise. This means I have the prima facie duty to do so because promises are the type of things I have an obligation to keep as long as no other conflicting prima facie duties gets in the middle. A prima facie duty can be overridden by competing prima facie duties. In order to decide which prima facie duty to go with one must consider all the morally relevant merits of the particular situations and identify ones multiple prima facie duties. Then one must decide which of the prima facie duties hold the most say for the specific circumstances. Ross proposed these seven prima facie duties so that individuals can reference them in times of trouble to help lead them to the right thing to do but ultimately it would come down to your judgment. These prima facie duties have no rankings or one super principle, so there is no problem of inconsistency. Ross’s theory is limited in telling you how to a resolve an issue, but can guide …show more content…

The duty of self-improvement is to behave in a way to promote ones own overall well being. Again these things can be ones health, security, knowledge, happiness, and moral values. Your duty of non-maleficence has to do with avoiding injury or harm to others. Non-maleficence for example can cause great conflict and one must consider the morally relevant facts. Lets say that one has the right to avoid harm, but someone else may have the right to harm you if you are intentionally try to harm them. Ones right to avoid harm was override by that individuals right to life or overall well-being. Another example is abortion. Abortion would be a conflicting case because you need to rely on your moral intuitions. Your duty of beneficence says one must be willing to help the help child because his life hangs in the balance but you might be actively bringing upon harm to the mother who’s health and overall well being may hang in the balance if she has the child. One must use moral judgments, relevant facts and determine which action is most

Get Access