Wind Turbines: Why has it caused so much controversy in Puerto Rico?
As the Law of Conservation states, energy can be neither created nor destroyed (The Secret Lives of Energy). That means that an energy source has to be use in order to generate the energy needed. It is common knowledge that the pollution caused by the use of fossil fuels over time is making society live in a contaminated world. In addition, the cost of the use of fossil fuels is increasing and becoming too expensive, forcing people to find alternate ways in which they can pay less for the use of energy. The use of fossil fuels over time has increased to a point where the remaining reservoirs have decreased by a large margin. On the other hand, renewable energy is
…show more content…
It is considered green energy because it uses resources the Earth will replace and does not pollute nor harm the environment (Alliant Energy). Fossil fuels, which are fuels found under the Earth’s ground, such as petroleum, cannot be replaced and cause large levels of pollution (SF Environment). One of the renewable sources causing the most controversies in Puerto Rico is the wind. In order to use the wind to generate power, also known as Aeolic energy, wind turbines are needed.
According to research done by Discovery News, in January 25, 2013, the top 10 countries, by order of most demand and use of wind energy, are: China, United States, Germany, Spain, India, Italy, France, Canada, Brazil, and Denmark. All of these countries are investing money in wind turbine projects because, in the long run, it is going to benefit them from both the economic and ecofriendly point of view (Discovery News). In addition to these top ten countries in the world, there are more countries that have, or are, investing in these types of projects, since this is the future and correct path for the use Renewable Energy as a replacement for fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are harming the environment to the point where in a short amount of time it is going to be almost impossible to live on Earth because of the catastrophic changes the pollution will cause. (Environmental and Energy Study Institute). The controversies caused in
During the past couple of centuries, humans were able to accomplish more things than the entirety of human existence. Mankind was able to prolong life, cure deadly diseases, and more. One of the greatest achievements was converting fossil fuels into energy. People are able to take the fossilized remains and turn them into the everyday fuel everyone in the world uses. However, the energy humans have been using is not clean. The more people use fossil fuels, the more the planet dies. Fortunately, scientists and engineers were able to come up with ways to renew energy. They created new technologies that are capable of harvesting the sun’s rays, water currents, and wind power. Even though renewable energy sources like this have been discovered, people still neglect to convert to them and continue to use fossil fuels.
Wind energy is a clean, alternative source of energy that does not produce greenhouse gas emissions and can be produced domestically. While wind energy accounts for a small overall portion of the energy produced in the United States, the potential for wind energy is significant. Nevertheless, there are some obstacles that delay the widespread use of this technology, including intermittency of wind, cost, and public policies that deter their implementation.
Imagine getting free electricity, or electrical company’s paying you instead of you paying them, today’s windmills just might make this possible. Windmills dating back as far as the 1400’s have been used to turn wind into useable energy for grinding and pumping. Today’s windmills turn turbines to make electricity. They are popping up all over the United States, but the United States is way behind other countries in the development of wind energy. Countries like Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom are investing billions of dollars into wind energy, including off shore wind farms. Germany is holding the top spot in the production of wind-generated electricity. Denmark, being one of the smaller countries in Europe, produces twenty percent
Renewable energy should replace fossil fuels because they are cleaner. Fossil fuels are well known to poison the Earth. They may seem like a solution to our energy needs but they are doing more harm than good. Even though they are so toxic to the Earth we still have a while until we can completely switch to clean energy. “The
“A wind turbine is a machine for converting the kinetic energy in wind into mechanical energy”. (1) The inventor of the first electric wind turbine was Clevelander Charles Brush, who ran his entire Euclid Avenue mansion off of one for 20 years, which later made the cover of Scientific American in 1888. (2) Although the use of alternate energy didn't rise a great deal afterward, this event did open the eyes for many environmentalists. Wind power is only one of our several “energy source[s] whose ‘fuel’ is free and will never be exhausted” (3) with the pros and cons not completely weighed out as to whether it will be truly beneficial or not. The two main issues regarding wind turbines are the environmental effects that they have and the
(Fossil fuels were not put on the list, with the exception of clean coal, because of their CO2 emissions that lead to global warming) Wind power is often called the “best of renewables” because of its inexpensive startup costs and lack of CO2 emissions. It beats solar because materials needed to build solar panels often come from war-torn child labor countries in Africa, like the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Yet wind has a major downfall: it takes up huge swaths of land. The study did not take into account the opportunity cost that using a gargantuan amount of land would have on the US. This land could be used for farming, housing, national parks, and more, but the land is instead wasted on enormous eye-sore turbines. In fact, it would take two times the size of Massachusetts of wind turbines to equal the space required for 99 nuclear reactors in the US (Bryce 1). Nuclear reactors would take up 500 times less land, even with waste disposal included. (Bryce 2). With droughts, rising sea levels, and outward city growth threatening the amount of useable land, it would be unwise to construct wind farms. Thus, nuclear energy would take up much less land and would be better for the environment than wind
Wind energy has many advantages over other natural resources. Turbines do not pollute the environment at all, unlike fossil fuels and they use a fuel that is free and inexhaustible. It cannot be charged a ridiculous amount like oil and other fossil fuels. Though wind only accounts for a small fraction of the world’s total electricity production (2.5%), the field is rapidly growing at a rate of about 25% per year, creating lots of manufacturing and technical jobs, improving the American economy. Wind also has enormous potential. It could possible generate 20 times more than what the human population needs at full capacity. Because turbines must be spread apart, the spaces of land in-between the turbines can be used for other things, unlike the bulky, close together rows of solar panels needed to harness solar energy. Due to better technology and advances in the field prices of turbines have significantly decreased (80% since 1980).
According to United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) the term green industry is defined as an industry that ensures sustainable and viable future with no harm on our environment (UNIDO 2016). In Puerto Rico, manufacturing industry accounts for about 46.3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This indicates that Puerto Rico is highly dependent on different manufacturing industries for its revenue. Similarly, according to Puerto Rico 2015 profile, about four-fifth of the energy comes from petroleum products which fuels largely transportation, electricity generation and manufacturing industries. In 2015, it was found that 51 percent of the
So far, all of Argentina’s renewable energy sources have been left unexploited. According to advisory group Ernst & Young, wind energy sources in Patagonia
Looking at renewable energy sources that will benefit the budget of countries and help out the environment is simple. "There is enough wind power, in fact there is plenty of wind power in Quebec alone to power most of North America (Marsden).” In the middle west where we live we have wind almost every day. Towards Chicago there are hundreds of wind turbines that produce energy, but why aren’t we using this for all our power? Wind power is reliable and pays for itself in a short period of time. “Bringing wind power and other reusable energies is quicker and easier to accomplish (Marsden).” Some may think that wind energy is more hassle than it is worth but actually is more beneficial because with wind there is no worry for fracking and other
During the course of history, this country has been seeking new forms of energy that will provide clean energy and also preserve Earth’s lifespan. The use of renewable and non-renewable resources has been a major controversy throughout history. Renewable energy such as wind power has been a main focus of this issue. Many believe wind energy is the best renewable power source over many others because it is the cleanest and most efficient, whereas, others view wind energy as a time bomb that will soon destroy the planet. Alternative energy sources should replace non-renewable energy with wind energy.
Global warming has taken a significant toll on the environment and heath of human and animals. The use of non-renewable fossil fuels such as natural gas, coal, crude oil, tar sands and oil shales are finite resources on the planet and will one day run out because they are regularly used. Subsequent pressure and heating while being buried consisting of organic matter and dead plant over millions of years are what created these fossil fuels. Burning fossil fuels form greenhouse gases from carbon dioxide, acid rain from sulfur dioxide, and photochemical pollution from nitrous oxides. The use of renewable energy is cleaner and safer for the environment and promotes investments. Some examples of renewable energy are Solar, Wind, and Hydro. Renewable energy is any energy that does not intake limited resources of the Earth and can be conveniently and instantly restored.
Over millions of years the fossilized remains of plants and animals have decayed and been stored in the form of petroleum, natural gas, or coal underground for our later extraction. This stored energy can then be burned to use as fuel (DOE 2008). Because these fuels take millions of years to form, the available supply is limited for our ever-progressing industrial society. Our usage is causing a lot of concern among the energy conscious all over the world due to the fact that many developed nations could not function without fossil fuels. The main solution to this problem goes by the name of “alternative”, “renewable”, or “clean” energy. This energy comes from sources apart from fossil fuels, this includes wind, solar, and geothermal among others (Utah 2013). These
It's sustainable. Wind is actually a form of solar energy. Winds are caused by the heating of the atmosphere by the sun, the rotation of the Earth, and the Earth's surface irregularities. For as long as the sun shines and the wind blows, the energy produced can be harnessed to send power across the grid. Wind turbines can be built on existing farms or ranches. This greatly benefits the economy in rural areas, where most of the best wind sites are found. Farmers and ranchers can continue to work the land because the wind turbines use only a fraction of the land. Wind power plant owners make rent payments to the farmer or rancher for the use of the land, providing landowners with additional income (“ Early 1900 technology.”) Within all of the electricity household electricity is about a third of it total. US uses a lot more electricity than the UK to be exact they use two and a half as much. Also the US uses four times as much as the Italians. Then US uses ten times as much as the Indian household. We all tend to use electricity the same way while there is a huge amount used gap. The percentage for the UK is 25% on entertainment, 19% on heating, 15% on lighting, 13% on refrigeration, 12% on cooking, also 12% on washing which includes clothes to. As in for the US they use 29% on entertainment, 22% on air conditioning, 15% on lighting, 9% on heat, 9% water heating, and then 13% on refrigeration. On average the amount of money spent a year on electricity is $1,400 a year
We all depend on energy to provide us with electricity for our daily activities. The energy that comes from coal, oil, and natural gas are called fossil fuel and these are nonrenewable energy sources. All electronics used electricity in order to be useful, and they all come from nonrenewable energy sources that cannot be replaced when is being used up or get flatted in our lifetime. Due to the fact that the nonrenewable energy sources cannot be replenished when is used, it would be very much important to shift to other energy sources like renewable energy sources. These are energy resources that can be replaced at any time. It is much more nature-friendly than non renewable resource. Renewable energy resource can be grouped into five major categories namely hydropower, solar, biomass, geothermal and lastly wind energy. Renewable energy resources could, if developed and implemented can provide 90 to 100 percent of the energy demand for the world in the next four decades (Harvey). Now, we get almost ten percent of the energy we use from renewable sources. So, one may ask if it does not harm the environment and will not get finished, in this case, then why should we not used them everywhere and all the time? It is because is expensive to produce, or because of its demerit? This has made people wondering if it will be possible to provide the world with enough energy from this renewable