Why Is The Crusades Justified Dbq

The Crusades took place in the Middle East between 1095 and 1291. They were used to gain a leg up on trading, have more land to show hegemony, and to please the gods. Based upon the documents, the Crusades between 1095 and 1291 were caused primarily by religious devotion rather than by the desire for economic and political gain.

However, this didn’t mean that they were merciful, for example one Jew was captured and led to a church where the crusaders tied a rope around his neck and there they said “You can still be saved; will you change your faith?” When he didn’t cooperate, they cut off his neck. The Crusaders were so brutal that they were thought to be just as guilty to God then other religions. For example an abbot of Cluny wrote during the second crusade, “What is the good of going to the end of the world at great loss of men and money to fight the Saracens, when we permit among us other infidels who are a thousand times more guilty towards Christ than the Mohammedans?” He describes here how the Mohammedans were a lot less guilty towards Christ then the Christians who were in the Crusades themselves for killing innocent

The crusades had both a positive and negative impact on the Eastern and Western worlds that were involved in the conflicts. The crusades were a series of nine wars between the muslims and christians. In the year 1095 Pope Urban II calls for a crusade to free the Holy Land from “Infidels.” The question on document 1: is “Why does the author of this document call the legacy of the crusades a bitter one?.” It states that they left hatred behind them.

The crusades did nothing but leave religious hate. Document 1 states that “They also left a bitter legacy of religious hatred behind them. In the Middle East, both Christians and Muslims committed appalling atrocities in the name of religion. In Europe, crusaders sometimes turned their fury against Jews, massacring entire communities.

The Crusades were battles between European Christians and Muslims. Now, the Crusades caused many things, both good and bad. But the question is, were the effects of the Crusades more positive or negative? From what I can tell, most of the results of the Crusades were negative ones. To begin, the Crusades have caused a lot of hate towards these religions.

The Crusades were a sequence of religious and political wars fought for over 200 years for power of the Holy Land. Originally the purpose for the Crusades was to take the Holy Land and Jerusalem away from the Muslims. However, the people who partook in this series of wars were not only driven by their faith, but they were also motivated by their own economical gains. Numerous Crusaders were inspired by the chance to gain wealth, land and power. At the same time the Roman Catholic Church saw the Crusades as an opportunity to gain the Holy Land for Catholics. In all, these examples show that the Crusades were not only driven by religious beliefs but by economic and political gain as well.

In Document 1 the pope wrote, “ On whom therefore is the labor of avenging these wrongs and of recovering this territory incumbent, if not upon you?” This shows how the pope made the task to fight to win back the holy land up to all the christians. The pope used a certain zealousness to make the Christians excited about fighting in the Crusades. The Pope also went on to say “Accordingly undertake this journey for the remission of your sins, with the assurance of the imperishable glory of the kingdom of heaven.” The Pope told the christians that all their sins would be forgiven and they would go to heaven if they fought against the muslims to take back the holy land. This persuaded the christians to fight because they thought it was what god wanted them to do . The pope knew that by telling people this he would encourage them although some might’ve believed that it was what god really wanted them to do enough do that they would put their own life at risk to follow what god or the pope thought was

The Crusades was a horrific time. Many people had lost their lives, friends, even family. The Crusades were a battle over the holy land, Jerusalem. The Crusaders, people who had fought in the Crusades, were Christians. They wanted the holy land because they believe that’s where Jesus had died and rose. They had fought against the Muslims who were defending themselves against the Crusaders. The Crusades had its positive outcomes as well as its negative results. Some may wonder, were the results of the Crusades more Positive or Negative? I strongly believe the outcome was mostly negative mainly because the Crusaders didn’t win the holy land, lots of lands were destroyed, and so many people lost their lives in the battle of the Crusades.

As the first crusade began to take shape in 1095, Christians and Jews had an abrasive, or challenging, relationship. While there was nothing in the papal program that was explicitly anti-Jewish, Christians had long had a negative perception of Jews. To the acolytes of Christ, followers of the Torah were, “…Enemies of the Christian faith, regarded as responsible for Christ’s death on the cross” (Tyerman 30). To blame a group of people for the death of a beloved spiritual leader, is to cause friction between two followings. If this was the reason for the hatred of Jews, what

The First Crusades and the Islamic empire were both extremely strong and successful empires. These empires took charge and conquered other empires. There are many similarities and differences to why these empires and their military forces were so successful.

The Crusades were a series of military campaigns, launched by Christians originally as an effort to reclaim the Holy Land. Each individual crusade had different outcomes, some more positive than others. Ultimately, neither Muslim nor Christian won. Whether or not the Crusades left a bloody or innovative wake in its path remains controversial, but it undoubtedly changed the course of history forever.

The Crusades were more negative rather beneficial because of the religious hatred that they left behind and that they turned onto jews. Document one states,”...massacring entire communities,” meaning many people died because of the bitter legacy of the hatred of the religious.This is important because religious hatred is a legacy that was left by the crusades when they also failed in their chief

Later, the slaughter against Muslim and Jews was utilized as an excuse to indict the Roman Catholic Church in the period of Protestant Reformation. As a result of this, many people in the European began to lose faith in the Roman Catholic Church since it was no longer regarded as a moral authority.[1] The violence carried out by the Christians was considered to be brutal. With the increasing scale of influence of the membership within European continent, there was also an increase in the loyalty to the church. Consequently, the religious tolerance got low, which made the Jewish in European become an obvious target.

The effects of crusades which lead to the slaughter of Jews and Muslims were later used as accusation against the Roman

The Crusades were battles in Palestine waged from 1096 to 1212 by European Christians to take back the Holy Land. Religious devotion was a major cause of the Crusades because of the expelling of the Muslims from the Holy Land, the promise of remission of sins, and the unity of European Christians of different origins under Pope Urban II. The want of the expulsion of Muslims from the Holy Land showed that the Crusades were caused by religious devotion. In 1095, the Byzantine Emperor called for help because they were being attacked by Turks.