Imagine that you just figured out that you were going to be hung for something that you didn’t do. That is what Mary Surratt experienced on July 7, 1865. Mary Surratt was scared for her life because of helping with the assassination of the president that she was mostly unaware of. Mary Surratt received a far worse punishment than she should have because she did not hurt or kill anyone, she was barely a part of the plot of the assassination, and the only thing she did was bringing supplies to a bar. The first reason that Mary Surratt received a far worse punishment than she got was because she did not hurt anyone. She got hung for treason, which she didn’t do, according to various websites. Treason is overthrowing the government, according to “dictionary.com”. Surratt did not overthrow the government. The book, Chasing Lincoln’s Killer says, “The soldiers arrested Mary Surratt”. The book never talks about Mary rebelling against the soldiers. This evidence shows that Mary Surratt received a far worse punishment than she got, because she didn’t hurt anyone. …show more content…
This is because soldiers found out evidence in her house that she supported the confederacy, but not a part of the kidnapping plot. Also on page 16, the text states, “She agreed, and soon she drove down to Surrattsville by carriage.” She did not supply weapons or ammunition, and the book, Chasing Lincoln’s Killer, then only talks about her arrest and nothing else about her. This shows that she was innocent because she was barely a part of the kidnapping of the president
The Guilty Party Mary Surratt should have been executed because she helped kill the president. Mary Surratt was not just caught for bringing the guns, there was also evidence that she knew many of the conspirators. One reason she is guilty is Mary Surratt brought guns to the tavern which were later later used to kill the president. In the text it reads, “According to him, on both occasions she inquired about “Shooting Irons” previously deposited by her son” (Source 2).
Mary Surratt’s Execution Mary Surratt should have been executed. Mary should have been executed because she lied to the officials. Mary Surratt lied to the officials. In source 2 it reads, “Mrs. Surratt professed no surprise at the terrible new. Later, when the officials paid the house a second visit, her response was dramatically different, and she appeared shocked.”
Mary Surratt was a “forty-two-year-old Maryland widow,” (Swanson 15). She was a Southerner before she moved to Washington D.C., which means that the Confederate belief still influenced her. She was also the mother of John Surratt, who was a “Confederate secret agent and friend of Booth’s,” (Swanson 15). She owned a boarding house in Washington D.C., which has been visited by many Confederates, including John Wilkes Booth and Lewis Powell. There are numerous indications that suggest she had something to do with the assassination plot that took place on April 14th, 1865.
Mary Queen of Scots was executed on the 8th February 1587 after she was implicated in the Babington Plot against Elizabeth. Queen Elizabeth of England did not give her explicit consent to the execution of Mary, however, Elizabeth did sign the death warrant. The execution of a sister monarch at the hands of Elizabeth I was a significant event because it had consequences that affected not only England but mainland Europe as well.
Mary Surratt should have been executed . She should have been executed because she lied about knowing people .
As Mary Surratt walked up the steps of the gallows, knowing that the low hanging noose was about to take her life, she whispered to the soldier “don’t let me fall’. Moments later the thick rope instantly brought Surratt to her last breath. Mary was accused for being involved in the association of the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln on April 15th, 1865. Mary Surratt deserved to be executed for holding her tongue during the assassination.
Is Mary Surratt guilty? Mary Surratt is being accused of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and is being hanged for it. Some people say that Dr.Mudd did it and other people say that Mary did it but who really killed Abraham Lincoln? Mary Surratt definitely deserved to be hanged for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
Mary Surratt was guilty and deserved to be put in prison for helping assassinate the president. Mary Surratt lied when it came to talking about the kidnap/assassination plot to kidnap/assassinat Abraham Lincoln and frequently talked to John Wilkes Booth.
Mary Surratt, a women who assisted in killing Abraham Lincoln , is guilty of conspiracy because she knew what the plans where to assassinate the 16th president of the United States. She gave John Wilkes Booth, the killer of the president, and their follow colleagues a places to sleep and live, the boarding place she provided is also the place they came up with the plans to murder the president. One of the people who were around during this was John M. Lloyd, he was an assistant to Mrs.Surratt . As he describes Mrs. Surratt in his testimony, he had do several things that had to be done to make sure that their plan carried thru, Like getting an buggy to pick up Booth to go to the theater. Also Mrs.Surratt and Booth often held private meetings
Most Americans know John Wilkes Booth as the assassin of Abraham Lincoln- shot at a play at Ford’s Theater on April 14th, 1865. However, the names of the conspirators that surrounded Wilkes Booth are relatively unknown, especially that of Mary Surratt. Mary Surratt, a mother and boardinghouse proprietor, was arrested and tried for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln along with her son, John Surratt. Pleas from her family, lawyer, and fellow conspirators did not allow her to escape her fate, and she was hanged for her crimes on July 7th, 1865. Even from the scaffold, Lewis Powell, another conspirator condemned to die, cried, “Mrs. Surratt is innocent. She doesn't deserve to die with the rest of us.” So who was this woman, and most
John Wilkes Booth was killed by a Union soldier on the Garrett Farm. He hid in a barn which was burned down to find him and he was shot in the back of the neck by a Union soldier. George Azterodt was the assassin that was supposed to kill Andrew Johnson, but lost his nerve. He was killed by hanging in July 1865. Lewis Powell was the assassin that was hired to kill the Secretary of State, William Seward. He entered the Seward home and injured him and his son as well as a bodyguard. He was later captured and hung in July 1865. A lesser known conspirator was Mary Surratt. She owned a boarding house in Washington were the conspirators met and planned the assassinations. She was hung and was the first woman executed in U.S. history. In my opinion, I believe that the punishments that the conspirators received was just and fair. The punishment was execution by hanging, The hanging was just for what they did to the U.S. and what they attempted. They were treated as traitors and terrorists, which they deserved. I believe that terrorists should be put in jail if they are domestic. If they are foreign we should use the rules that are set by their country of origin.
Mary Surratt should have not been executed, but imprisoned. Mary Surratt was guilty because she was a part of Abraham Lincoln’s kidnapping plot along with being untruthful.
Mary Surratt was the defendant among the executed that received a punishment far out weighing her role in the crime. Mary Surratt was convicted of conspiracy in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln in 1865. She was sentenced to death and became the first woman to be executed by the U.S. government. Mary Surratt was the mother of John Surratt who was a conspirator that helped John Wilkes Booth plan Lincoln’s kidnap and later, his assassination. With the help of Chasing Lincoln’s Killer, “Lincoln and the Writ of Liberty,” and the movie The Conspirator, it can be proven that Mary Surratt’s punishment was unjust. Mary Surratt received a punishment far worse than what she deserved because she was innocent, blamed for her son’s actions, and she did
The stoning of Tessie Hutchison was prompted by tradition and society. Everybody believed that if you held a lottery and stoned someone it would give you a good harvest. Almost every town in the story had a lottery, although we read that some young people had stopped their lottery. Every person in the town seems numb to the stoning, no one seemed to think twice about killing someone who was probably their friend just because it was tradition. Since every person took place in this horrific act it wasn't considered murder, even though it was.
She didn't answer Atticus’s questions and then she turned on the jury (Lee 189-91). She called out the white men, calling them cowards if they did not find this man guilty. This shows corruption within the court system because of race. The jury is being told to decide on race and personal image, rather than on the facts of the case (Lee).