preview

Why Is Lincoln's Assassination Justified

Decent Essays

On April 14th, 1865, John Wilkes Booth kidnaped and assassinated Abraham Lincoln. It was a mournful day for individuals of the U.S . Meanwhile, Booth wanted to protect the South against the Union. He had co-conspirators by his side who attempted to kidnap the president several times but ended in failure. Many think Booth should have done something different to change Lincoln's idea of abolishing slavery. Although John Wilkes Booth did something wrong for the right reason, it will never be justified because there is always a different alternative.
Being motivated to do harsh actions leads to jealousy, which develops a person to do anything for their own satisfaction. Considering the fact, Booth compares himself to Brutus which was the Roman statesman who murdered Julius Caesar. Brutus and his fellow Roman senators feared Caesar wanted to become the dictator of the republic. In the article, " Last Diary Entry of John Wilkes Booth", Booth states, " I am here in despair. And why? For doing what Brutus was honored for. What made Tell a hero? And yet I, for striving down a greater tyrant..."(1). This means …show more content…

Booth's assassination toward Lincoln did not make a difference after all since the African Americans received their freedom. In the other hand, after Caesar's death, Rome comes into a cycle of civil wars which leads to an empire. The citizens of Rome are unhappy about the upcoming wars, they thought the killing of Caesar will make their problems go away but instead it leads to more chaotic situations. In the article, "The Telegraph", it states, "With Caesar gone, Rome spiraled into another cycle of civil wars, which resulted in one of the most significant constitutional transformations in history"(19). This means, the citizens of Rome regret not having Caesar as their leader. They would rather have Caesar than to deal with civil

Get Access