Why Drivers Ed Should Be Offered In Public Schools

Question 6: Uninsured drivers become subject to license and vehicle registration suspension when accident damages amount to:

Some suggestions have been to increase the driving age to twenty-one and older, however, the lack of experience would be heightened with a possible increase of driving under the influence since the legal drinking age is twenty-one. Therefore, instead of raising the driving age why doesn’t the state, or even community create a mandatory Driver’s Ed class, one for learning about driving and another for actually driving. This is due to the idea that teens are more likely to see the errors of their classmates and not want to make the same mistake, or see what to do in certain situations that a teen might not know about. For example, the majority of teens aren’t actually taught about what to do in case one's car starts hydroplaning, which is crucial for not only the driver but anyone around them on the road safety. This is due to how the cars wheels have no traction on the ground and if they accelerate, or brake they could lose control of their car even more so than they already had. Thus, providing a mandatory class for graduation for students aged sixteen through nineteen will give them the opportunity to gain experience and knowledge, so that they have a decreased chance of being involved in an

If there is a law that restricts teens below the age of 18 or 21 from driving, all of the kids attending school will depend on the bus to get to school. Schools will have to own and run more buses out every day which would cost more money. The average amount of money spent running buses

In secondary school, kids have a couple of choices of getting the chance to class: having their guardians drive them, taking the transport, or driving themselves. The most simple alternative is for them to drive themselves to class. Being an authorized driver is a gigantic obligation and is expected to show youthful understudies how to handle obligation.

Driver ed lets you get your license sooner . But to get into the classes has cost 50 to 150 per session you have . So at the end of your class when you have finally done, you would be spending at least three hundred to eight hundred dollars to get your license

Having a later start time for schools would result in an increase in safety in students. One risk that occur when schools start earlier, is the risk of students driving to school while still sleepy. This can result in life threatening car crashes if a student falls asleep behind the wheel. Studies provided by The Encyclopedia of School Health show that the average crash rate of teen drivers went down drastically with school districts that started later. Specifically, the research showed that “the average crash rate for teenage drivers dropped 16.5% in 2 years” (“School Start Times”). Another danger that is brought up with the safety of tired students, is their awareness when crossing streets and busy areas. While those who are tired can still look and check multiple

This would also minimize crashes during morning commutes. This is because many teens drive themselves to school are inexperienced. If they are drowsy when driving, they could endanger themselves and the people around them. According to an article by Fred Danner and Barbra Phillips, delaying school start times may decrease the risk of motor vehicle crashes.

Getting up out of bed in the morning can be a struggle for teenagers, especially those who did not get enough sleep that night. Once they are up the teenagers drag their feet to get ready for school because they are tired. The teenagers old enough to drive are the ones most at risk because they drive half asleep to school, which greatly increases their already high chances of crashing. Studies say, “In the United States, the fatal crash rate per mile driven for 16-19 year-olds is nearly 3 times the rate for drivers ages 20 and over. Risk is highest at ages 16-17. In fact, the fatal crash rate per mile driven is nearly twice as high for 16-17 year-olds as it is for 18-19 year-olds” (Teenagers). Higher statistics would be possible if the study was focused on only teenagers who drive to school tired. Students chances of getting in a crash would skyrocket. Studies also say “teen drivers who start class earlier in the morning are involved in significantly more motor vehicle accidents than peers with a later high school start time (Teens). The opposing side may say that school needs to start on time because that is when the bus needs to pick the students up or that teens should not go unsupervised. Driving tired is not the only safety concern regarding their child or children. What the other side does not realize is that not only can later school start times solve the issue of hazardous driving, but later start times can also

As you all know, getting a head start in life is not an easy task. Obstacles are notorious for popping up when we least expect and even when we are utterly unprepared. Often at times, I have overheard my fellow students asking, "why do we need school?" The answer I have personally come up with is that school is and was designed to prepare students for the real world. A large portion of students of Selinsgrove Area High School, myself included, do not have access to Driver Educational classes, or commonly known as Driver's Ed. The reason I bring this up is that if the purpose of school is to prepare oneself for adulthood and one of the vital necessities a young adult must be acquainted with is the ability to drive an automobile, then why is Driver's Ed not a given class here?

In 2013, more than 2,500 teenagers died in the United States from motor vehicle crash injuries. Such injuries are by far the leading public health problem for young people 13-19 years old (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety [IIHS], 2014). Drivers are not the only ones at risk. Teenagers who are passengers in others vehicles make up a startling 87% of the fatality statistic. Lack of driving experience, disregard for traffic laws, and quick access to full driving privileges contribute to teen death. To reduce teen driving fatalities, successful completion of driver education classes provided by public and private schools should be mandatory for all teenagers prior to receiving their driving permit.

The article has no statistical evidence to support the ideas they provided. They also offer no statistics on how the revoking of a student’s license has made a positive impact on a student’s academic life. Therefore, I think taking away a student’s privilege to drive is unfair and would have minimal effect on improving their academic

Graduated Driver Licensing would ensure that poor decision making and activities would be eliminated and corrected before becoming bad habits, given that the supervising adult is responsible.

When you get your licence and drive about a year that would help people improve your driving skills because that would help people later on in their life and it would help them not to crash into other people or into a building on into a person or something like that.

Teens should not be permitted to drive until they are 18 years old. They should be able to drive on a temporary permit when they are 16 years old and use it until they turn 18 years old. This permit would allow them to drive only during daylight hours and with a parent/guardian. This would enable the young drivers to become more experienced. The eight hours of drivers training with your instructor is not enough. These teens need to get a feel for the road and learn to drive defensively. If you do not know how to operate a vehicle responsibly, it could be used as a deadly weapon. These young drivers are hurting themselves and other innocent people, because of their lack of experience and their irresponsibility.

The second reason that teens should attend a driver’s education course, is to give the teen driver actual experience behind the wheel. Parents are mostly