In general, for-profit schools cost more to attend, because they are run like businesses. And it definitely does not take a college degree to see that these high prices plus low income students equal greater risk of default. For-profit colleges began as family owned trade schools but over the years they have expanded into educational businesses that accept any student, regardless of their financial wellbeing or aptitude. On the other hand, traditional schools have neglected to notice the rising need for an education that is flexible and convenient. In his article “Why Do You Think They’re Called For-Profit Colleges,” Kevin Carey writes to an audience of higher education students and faculty to convince them the pros and cons of both traditional and for-profit schools using different rhetorical, organizational, and stylistic strategies. The audience Carey writes to is based off of the readers of the magazine he writes for. He writes for The Chronicle of Higher Education so it is easy to see how his audience is mainly of those involved with the higher education system. This audience is educated and free thinking. Carey keeps this in mind throughout his paper, and allows his audience to reach their own conclusion.
Carey uses logos as a rhetorical strategy to make his article more persuasive. He begins by describing a man named Michael Clifford who never went to college but sometimes calls himself “Doctor” (Carey para. 1). He uses Clifford as a symbol throughout his paper to
In case, you are not aware, for-profit tuition is much higher than that of public institutions, and for profits receive a quarter of all federal aid while only enrolling 10 percent of all students (216). The real problem is that students of the much more expensive for-profit institutions tend to borrow a lot more money than the students of public institutions do and are often unable to repay these loans upon graduating and entering the work force. In fact, most graduates of for-profit institutions are unable to even get a job with their freshly awarded on line diplomas and therefore default on their federally subsidized student loans due to lack of income. Clifford refutes indications that the excessive amount of student debt is directly related to the cost of education, and therefore, disapproves of the Obama administration’s proposal to disallow further federal aid to any student who has exceeded a certain percentage of debt in relation to income. In spite of statistics that predict more than half of his students’ loans will enter default, he simply does not feel that it is the responsibility of
Kevin Carey takes a deep look into the controversies concerning for-profit colleges. For-profit colleges have received harsh criticism from institutions because of the way they recruit new students and use the loan system to gain even more of a profit, added on to the price of schooling. Even though only 10 percent of students get enrolled, a quarter of all federal aid goes to for-profit colleges. That seems extremely unfair. Carey begins with bringing us bad news, for-profit colleges do abuse the system of student loans, however they also bring educational opportunities for those who may have not had the option to attend college.
Kevin Carey is direct with what he believes is wrong with for-profit universities. He believes that they do offer classes that may be a better option for non-traditional or low-income students. However, these universities are doing these while scamming taxpayers throughout the country. These universities receive millions of dollars in funding from the government in grants and are still able to make a profit, although, many students are unable to repay their student loans in a timely manner. Some personnel within these universities use tactics to convince students to apply for loans, knowing that it is not a financially intelligent decision. Not only is this borderline unethical, but many students that receive these loans default on the payments. The for-profit universities are even attempting to change the funding from the current 90/10 rule, which states, the amount of federal funding cannot exceed 90 percent of total revenue. One quarter of all of federal aid is given to for-profits, even though, they account for less than 10 percent of students. Considering this information, government funding would be better served elsewhere.
Quindlen uses logos in her speech to give it structure and to help the audience understand her points. Logos is a statement, sentence or argument used to convince or persuade the audience by using logic or reason. In the introduction, the author explains how throughout her whole college career, she strived to be perfect, but it soon turned into a burden. In the body, the author focuses on
For-profit colleges target veterans because G.I. Bill was given to the veterans by the government, which helps veterans pay for their colleges’ tuition, up to $21000 a year. Also, veterans must be looking to seek degree and trying to get a good job after they get out from the military. So, that’s also one of the reasons for for-profit colleges to recruit them.
Logos is a rhetorical device that appeals to the reason, or logic, of the reader. Loving Life Therapy uses Logos to gain the visitors trust by talking about her studies and experiences. Dr.Yvonka de Ridder quotes that “After my studies and experience in the field of counseling, psychology, and human sexuality, I began to recognize that something
McCullough uses logos to convince his audience of Boston College graduates, to keep reading and learning throughout their lives. He uses quotes, several examples, and one statistic to persuade the students. He first uses logos to persuade them that information can be worth a fortune and can save lives, and that “The value of information, facts, figures, and the like, depends on what we make of it” (p.2).
College isn’t cheap. Reputable authors Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus took their work around the country writing “Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission” using primarily logos to discuss different approaches universities should be taking to reduce the amount of money students pay towards their tuition. Hacker and Dreifus wrote a post for The Chronicle of Higher Education on the topic of how cost affective colleges are. They used many logical examples of ways colleges could be making tuition more affordable for their students. They even searched the country for schools that they believed to be doing things right and explaining how they are being more affective in their ways of making college affordable. Hacker
He mentions a charter school called Kipp saying that, “Kipp students will have doubled their math and science scores by the time they graduate.” Using this rhetoric device persuades the audience to agree with the speaker’s point because it states irrefutable facts that support his argument. Another example of logos occurred when the author states that there is a direct correlation between students dropping out of high school and students that go to prison. This appeals to logos because it gives facts to emphasize the fact that going to a good high school has a big impact on your
"A Conveyer Belt of Droupouts and Debt at For-Profit Colleges"and "The Devil and Tom Walker" may not seem to be alike at first, but as you get to read both of these exerpts a clear theme is identified. For profit colleges are not worth the financial risk, as for-profit colleges are more geared towards taking your money, as opposed to providing you with the best education it can offer.
“Please don’t worry that I’m getting ready to lecture you about compassion or other-directedness or all the so called virtues.” This quote assures the readers that he will not bore them. Wallace shows that he has studied the genre which makes him seem more experienced and genuine. How does Wallace use LOGOS in the speech? Provide 8 SPECIFIC examples.
Colleges and university have slowly become one of the stepping stones into the working world today. People go to colleges for higher education with the intention of earning degrees in which they can use in their respective fields. Some example degrees that people pursue are Medical, Law, Business, Accounting, and Science Degrees. Through the years the idea of college was that it was optional and it was a door for better life and job. However in the modern times, it become a necessity. It all started when the colleges once single- gender institutions target specific students in their respective demographics. Today, the college market has now been divided into two major categories:
He shows them a world of possibilities resulting from hard work. Gaiman applies logos to engage the audience in reasoning together. One of the most imperative lessons a creative author will learn as a professional is where the halt line is of things you will or won’t do. He reasons with them on matters concerning decision making so that they can achieve their career goals. Logos builds up a concise, clear and logical argument which substantiates the message being relayed.
Gorgias goes on to explain three different occupations that use Logos to gain acceptance of opinions. Ultimately, Gorgias finishes comparing Logos to the effects of a drug (Freeman).
First, there are some students that disagree on college being worth it because of the cost of tuition that is, so high. They feel that college is far too expensive to even attend, so they just look for a job, instead because they feel that they’re wasting time and money. But, what they don’t know is, that there are other colleges out there that have much cheaper tuition to pay. According to Louis Menand, “Public Colleges are much less expensive—the average tuition is $7,605—and there are also many less selective private colleges where you can get a good education, and a lot more faculty face time, without having to spend every minute of high school sucking up to your teachers and reformatting your resume” (Live And Learn). Also, there are people that say they don’t have the money after they graduate from high school to get into college, which then, they can apply for financial