Why College Athletes Should Get Paid Essay

College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.

When you think of college athletes you often don't think about them getting paid. College athletes and whether or not they should get paid is a hotly debated topic that is likely not to end any time soon. It has gone on for many many years and no conclusion can be seen in the near future for the vigorously debated topic. The debate really picked up again when Kevin Ware suffered a compound fracture to his right leg which stuck several inches out of his shin. Injuries like this one often time end careers that have not even begun. It is sad to see young players get hurt and never be able to continue their career. It is also very unfortunate when players get hurt and their careers end before they have taken off. Every player in college basketball wants to walk of the court winning a national championship, but most can’t walk off the floor at the end of their career with the confetti flying from the ceiling and the stadium videoboard playing their picture to all their fans. Although most athletes can’t win a national championship to end their career some athletes don't even have a chance at that dream. VCU’s senior guard Briante Weber tore a knee ligament in a game that ended his college career. Unfortunately he won’t get the chance to play for VCU on his senior night, or to play in the NCAA Tournament. Weber was going to be

Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. These rules have long been challenged, however no changes have been made by the NCAA. With universities grossing close to $200 million a year college athletics has turned into one of the top industries in the world. The NCAA is a governing body of college athletics, but without people questioning the NCAA and demanding changes to the monopoly that the NCAA is nothing will happen to the unfairness to college athletes like it is currently.

The NCAA generates billions of dollars a year in revenue, through exploiting their athletes, and demeaning higher educations making them one of the most powerful and dangerous organizations in sports. The total annual revenue of the NCAA is $10.6 billion. very year, individually, every large Division I Men’s basketball school makes about $10.1 million dollars, and every large conference football school makes around $15.8 million per year (“NCAA College”). That revenue is split between a variety of things such as: ticket sales, tv and apparel contracts, and other merchandise sales (“NCAA College”). Perhaps the most profitable part of the NCAA is the television contracts. In 1961, Byers, then the commissioner of the NCAA, hired chief lobbyist

How would you feel if you were on your own, given a place to sleep, are working hard at school and in a physical activity, but were never given any wage for how hard you worked physically, and going to bed almost emaciated? The sad truth is that this actually is the case for some college students playing sports. Do you think that college athletes should be paid? This was the article that I chose to read. These college students at no time collect any type of salary for working hard for other people. I feel that these college students never should go to bed hungry, and should be paid for being on their college's sports teams.

With them being students first, they could easily give up on the big picture if they are surprised with mass amounts of money. Not only would they be getting paid now but their names would be famous and is likely they wouldn't handle the fame and fortune correctly like other stars paid before they are mature. Before we could even discuss paying them we would have to figure out who exactly would be paying the athletes. The schools or students paying tuition would be affected which could lead to budget cuts, hurting the overall universities. So that is why I believe college athletes should not be paid because it will ruin the integrity of the game.

College athletics have been incredibly profitable businesses for many years. With the advent of televised sporting events, the profit margin has increased exponentially. The Texas Longhorns’ football program alone grosses 104 million dollars annually (forbes.com). So, where is all that money going? Most of it goes right back to the school. The athletes who practice for endless hours and devote their lives to the sports get nothing but the satisfaction of winning. So, should Division One college athletes be paid? Division One athletes should be paid because they generate a significant amount of revenue for the school.

Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black

Many people preach that it's time to pay college players and that players should be paid because of how much money they make for their organizations over the years among other reasons like,hours invested, corruption prevention and teaching athletes how to manage money. There's more than just the money made that convinces me that college athletes should be paid , but how much exactly? The opposition would make tons of arguments Such as, financial irresponsibility, lack of maturity, its by choice, where the funding will go?. These are just a few points that I feel best argue the paying of collegiate athletes is the better option of the two. When earning an athletic scholarship it’s not as if all your day-to day responsibilities disappear, from

The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many

College athletics are becoming more like the professional leagues except for one big issue, money. Student athletes bring in a vast amount of revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) not to mention recognition and notoriety regarding the athlete’s university. However, the debate continues as to whether student athletes should or should not receive payment for playing college sports.

Your dream has come true; you're at college playing the sport you love, and at what cost? None. You are free to live your college life worry free and have been given the opportunity to continue your sports career. After you have completed your college education you can get a job, with no college loans that you have to pay off. You are also able to start making money right out of graduation. You get to experience this less stressful college life. The lives of athletes that walk-on and athletes not on a scholarship are stressful ones with many different things to worry about. Those athletes have to worry about how to pay for college and the loans they will have to pay back after graduation. They will have to pay for all their meals, books and the cost for dorms. But what got you here? There were many factors, but one that helped you the most was that you were a diverse athlete.

In contrast, college athletes simply give up too much to not be compensated. On average, college athletes spend on average 40 hours a week either practicing, or playing. Even with all of this time and effort given, it appears as not enough to be compensated for. In addition, the annual NCAA men 's basketball tournament referred to as “March Madness” affects more than six days of classes, which affects their learning in the classroom. Plus, everyday, every practice and every game athletes give up their bodies and health to play their sports. Everyday they live with the chance to get injured, which could even end some careers. And when athletes do get seriously injured, they have to pay for it, not the university. Equally important is the fact of recognizing college athletes as employees. At most schools, college coaches regulate student athlete speech on various social media websites, even when their sport is not in session. Treating them like employees, unpaid employees. In an article from TheSportster, it is stated that “Getting paid in college would help teach these players some responsibility before they are

There is currently a major issue in today’s college athletics. Universities and the NCAA make billions of dollars while some student-athletes go hungry. There is a huge debate over whether or not student-athletes should be paid as employees of their respective colleges. Personally, I don’t believe players should receive full-time salaries, but Universities and the NCAA should be required to increase the value of the scholarships that they award to student-athletes. By requiring that colleges provide athletes with an additional $2,000 per semester as part of their scholarship you can greatly increase the well-being (welfare) of the students.

Paying college athletes is a very controversial subject. There are pro’s and con’s to both sides of the subject. In my unprofessional opinion I believe that college athletes should be paid. Coming from a student athlete I know how much hard work and dedication is required to be successful on the field/court wherever the sport is taken place, let alone in the classroom. In 2011-2012 the NCAA reported $876.1 million dollars in revenue. Basketball generated roughly $293 million, baseball generated roughly $419 thousand and football the rest. The University of Texas generated more than $93 million in 2011-2012.(“How Much Money Do College Sports Generate?” ) I believe the NCAA makes more than enough money to have a flat rate pay for each player