My favorite character is juror 9, he is oldest man in this film, he change his vote in second time, and in the second time only he change his vote, he never change his mind after he think it’s not guilty, he can provide his opinion very clearly. He is argument with the other juror, with no fear. Another character I really like is juror 4, I think he is a smart man, he always keep clam during the case, he is support guilty side because he have evidence to make himself think he is right, his evidence is true and clearly, it’s not like other juror only know yelling to the people, he just said his evidence calm. The juror 4 change his vote in the last vote, because other juror’s evidence convince him, he is not like juror 10 and 3, they don't believe
Rose illuminates the concept of reasonable doubt by Juror Eight’s constant questioning of the credibility of the testimonies(thesis).
These statements display that the 8th Juror, as an individual, know exactly what he has to do as a jury member and is also honest, moral and trustworthy enough to lead the other jurors. For that reason, we observer the 8th Juror stepping forward to become a ‘saviour’ of the jury system.
“Three: You sat right in court and heard the same things I did. The man’s a dangerous killer. You could see it.”
12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose is a twisting story where a son is accussed of stabbing his father to death. Twelve strangers are told to listen to this court case and are then stuck in a small, hot room where they are told to decide on a verdict, whether or not the kid lives or dies. The jury finally decides on the verdict of : Not Guilty. Three major facts that influence the juries agreement that the accussed is not guilty include doubts of the murder weapon, doubts of the old man’s testimony, and doubts of the lady across the street’s testimony.
Juror 10 has a very specific personality that can be described in many ways. His character traits are shown in Figure-1. He is very harsh towards the other jurors and doesn’t care for any of them, making the best shape to describe him a triangle. Secondly, Juror 10 is a hateful person and never likes when anyone
The complexity of justice is evident in Reginald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men’, through the employment of Truth throughout the American 1950’s judicial system. Throughout the text, the concept of justice is forged by the racal prejudices, personal bias, emotion, logistics, and reasoning of the Jurors, thus allowing truth to hinder or prevail. Justice is shaped by truth in ‘Twelve Angry Men’, as the Jurors begin to understand the reasonable doubt in the evidence against the defendant, as the truth becomes prevalent through the Juror’s deductive capabilities, thus allowing for injustice to be hindered by the truth, which ultimately leads justice to prevail in the judicial system.
Claim: The most powerful message that Reginald Rose demonstrates in his play 12 Angry Men would be how tone matters to convey and nudge others towards an opinion. Established Evidence: By the use of tone, it emphasizes of whom the speaker is speaking to, engages important insights and show the true intentions of a person. Evidence: For instance, Reginald Rose demonstrates the tone of juror 8 as “this boy’s been kicked around all his life” who “had a pretty terrible sixteen years,” (pg 13) who is this ideal, respectful citizen who considers this boy’s life as important as his and everyone else. He later engages into the conversation to remind others to think what if they were in the boy’s shoes instead in a
The movie “12 Angry Men” had a variety of different character each with very different characteristics. They each had different roles they played in the group itself. The most obvious role in a group that speaks to me is the role of initiator.
in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is important because he is smart, brave, and fair. Juror 3 was important because he was the antagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant. Juror 9 was important because he wasn�t afraid of confronting other jurors. Juror 8 was a very important juror, he was the protagonist. He was the one that proved the truth. Juror 8 was very smart, he bought a knife similar to
Idealized Influence – defined by the values, morals, and ethical principles of a leader and is manifest through behaviours that supress self interest and focus on the good of the collective.
An individual's past experiences can have an incredible impact on the way they think and behave for years to come. So, the past have a significant impact on an individual. In my own life, I have had past experiences that have affected me to be the person I am today. One example is, whenever I walked through the downtown part of Edmonton and I noticed a lot of homeless people lying around on the streets. I felt so bad for those poor people that didn’t have a place to live. They appreciate anything and everything they get. This really effects me and teaches me to be more grateful in life. And appreciate everything I have. In the play the 12 Angry Men, jurors 3, 5, and 11 prove that their experiences has affected who they are. I believe that juror 3’s family issues such as his problems with his son has affected him to become an aggressive man. Additionally, juror 5 has had a background of living in a slum all his life. Therefore, he tries to prove that not all people living in slums are criminals. Lastly, juror 11 struggles with others judging him because he is a European Refugee. This affected him by making him feel unconfident about himself and feels that the others jurors don't take his opinion too seriously.
Twelve Angry Men is a very good movie and had a lot of ups and downs throughout the movie. Yes, I think it took a great deal of courage for Fonda to vote not guilty. First, everyone thought he was guilty without discussing and just jumping to a conclusion. Fonda actually wanted to give some thought to it and discuss why the kid deserved a chance and why he might not be guilty. Also, the mood in the room was very dark when all the jurors got into the room one guy just wanted to go the baseball game, so he just wanted the kid to be guilty so he could get out of there. Plus the fan wouldn’t work at first so all of them were hot and were ready to get out of there, so I think they just wanted the kid to be guilty.
Twelve Angry Men is a courtroom drama that was brought to the big screens in 1957. The storyline follows twelve men selected for jury duty, who are trying to reach a verdict on a young man’s trial following the murder of his father. Throughout the debates and voting, the men all reveal their personalities and motives behind their opinions. Because of all the differences of the men, their communication skills lack in some ways and are excellent in others. The three small group communication variables that I found portrayed throughout the movie were prejudice, past experience and preoccupation.
3. Social identity (10 points): What role(s) does social identity play in the movie? Discuss SID in relationship of the jury to the accused. (Define your terms and give two examples of how they apply).
Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, is a play about a jury trying to come to a verdict that will determine whether or not a teenage boy will be put on death row.