What Is The Community In The Giver

In The Giver, they try to be a utopia. Where there is nothing wrong, and everything is perfect and under control. The only problem is that there is too much control. Nobody has self-will, everyone is the same. And, everyone doesn’t know the truth about the past.

4.) Since there are so many rules which the residents in The Giver have to obey, there are no arguments or fights. This is because when choices are not in the hands of themselves they have nothing to fight about. Thus, a peaceful, safe and joyous community is made.

The first reason about sameness is choice. In The Giver they do not give you a choice of anything. They should be able to have a choice of what they want to do. For example, a job, they don't get to choose what job they get. The community does it for them. They should be able to choose there job because the committee might choose wrong. They might not like their job they get and it will never get changed. They should be able to pick what clothing they wear because they all wear the same thing. They might not be able

Equality has tried to be successful over the past thousands of years and in both stories, they accomplished that goal, but is it the kind of equality we want to have in our world? Well, in the stories “Harrison Bergeron” and The Giver, their vision of equality is not distributed fairly because in text of “Harrison Bergeron”, it explains that if someone is weaker than everybody else, the stronger people will be brought down with more handicaps or an object that restricts them from exceeding in what they are best in. An understanding quote from Samuel Johnson is, “It is better that some should be unhappy rather than that none should be happy, which would be the case in a general state of equality.” (Samuel Johnson). This quote relates to The

Accordingly to the community in The Giver, citizens have lost their diversity which prevents being same.Riding the same bikes,wearing the same clothes,and speaking the same language,even the same words, can’t be acceptable for our world.In this community,no one has a private life,no one has a right to lie,and even all the doors are unlocked except The Giver’s door.In the beginning of the novel,the reader influences about the perfection of the community,but throughout the story,Lowry shows that the community which is based on Perfection is not perfect at all.Actually,it’s a community which is based on strict rules just to prevent people from feelings,colors,and all the values which a human must have tasted at least once during their life times.Diversity is a very important value for humans,and a community can’t be perfect without it.

The people get to pick their representatives. On the other hand, in the Giver, knowone is in charge. People just know the rules and know they have to follow them so they don't need a leader. In the text it mentions that the council of elders is in charge of the decisions make(Lowry 77).

The setting of The Giver is bleak and lackluster, portraying everyone and everything as the same. There are no differences or any uniqueness. All of the families have the same amount of people in their household. For example, the book describes families as “two children-one male, one female- to each family unit. It was written very clearly in the rules” (11). People dress, speak, and even think similarly. With the strict rules the town makes force everyone to be the same. The citizens have to talk in a certain way or they will get punished. The girls cannot do their hair differently than others. Children are not allowed to ride bicycles until they turn nine years old. The

"It wasn't a practical thing, so it became obsolete when we went to the Sameness.” (84) The Giver, by Lois Lowry, is from the perspective of a twelve year old boy named Jonas growing up in a Utopia. At the Ceremony of Twelve, where every person that turns twelve receives their life-long “job”, Jonas finds out he has been selected to be the Receiver of Memory, the most honored of elders. The current Receiver of memory, who Jonas calls the Giver, transfers memories of color and feelings like pain and joy to him. As he receives each memory, he learns of a life outside of the utopia. This book proves that being perfect and the same as everyone else is not as great as it sounds. The Utopian society of sameness in

The Giver by Lois Lowry is about a community where its goal is to make their citizens the same. As a result, the community controls/limits what their citizens have and do. But, the people of the world we live in today have the power to choose and value our differences. Their world greatly differs from ours in several ways.

Imagine waking up one day, and all your choices are stripped away from you. You can no longer choice blue or red, up or down, one or two. Everything has been picked out for you whether you like it or not. The community in the Giver is a utopian society. All members have a clear-cut set of rules they must follow. The rules were made to get rid of pain and fix society’s problems. On the occasion of when the truth is revealed Jonas, a unique boy, questions society, and its motives. Personal choice is one of the most important things, even in the event that it may cause pain or suffering. Individuals within the community should have a right to pick their spouse, have their own children, and pick their careers.

The first five chapters of “The Giver” by Lois Lowry, were queer and predominantly talks about the community. These chapters made me feel that the government over rules and dominates the people. First of all, the government entrusts people a job, instead of letting the people determine what they want to become. Secondly, the government gives people a spouse, shouldn’t the people get to select who they want to marry? After reading these chapters, I was surprised by the fact that no one strikes for their rights. How can people live with these sorts of strict rules? So far of reading the novel makes me predict that Jonas will come to perceive a secret of the government or otherwise known as Committee of Elders. Jonas will try to apprise the people

The Giver is a book written by Lois Lowry telling a story about an utopian world. After reading this novel, it made me rethink profoundly that rules is a double-edged sword, while having it in society, notwithstanding we can be benefited, it can also hurt us. In my opinion, rules is the protocol which protect citizens from the harm of greedy and competition, and to balance the criterion of morality. First of all, the very thing in this world which created by the author is that they is a rule which having feelings is restricted. From my perspective, although people can not initiative conflict which most time caused by the feeling of greedy, without feelings it is hard to count as human beings instead of working machine, feeling it is a vital factor of mankind.

Numerous, basic rights were taken away from citizens in an attempt to form a more perfect world. The Community that the characters of The Giver belong to is constructed to eliminate differences, irregularities, choices, emotions, and colors. This is called Sameness. Everyone looks similar; the weather is always sunny and a constant temperature; members have no choice of what to eat or wear; their emotions are reduced to simple feelings, and they are required to share them with their family units each night.

Imagine living in a world where you have no feelings, your spouse and children are picked for you, and people pick a job for you, and you cannot say anything about it. In The Giver, people gave up their choices to live a world like this. In my opinion, it is not worth giving up your choices to live in a perfect world. I would not want to give up my choices for a Giver, a family unit, and an assignment.

One thing that would make The Giver community more positive is Choices. One supporting quote in on page 97, “If everything’s the same, then there aren’t any choices! I want to wake up in the morning and decide things! A blue tunic, or a red one? He looked down at himself , at the colorless fabric of his clothing. But it’s the same always.” This quote is helpful because the scientist made everything to sameness and they didn’t want anyone to choose what they wear. But if the community could see color then the people would have the freedom to choose what color tunic they want to wear and decide if they like it or not, and if they didn’t like it then they