What Is Coplan's First Level Of Engagement?

CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.3.3: Describe characters in a story (e.g., their traits, motivations, or feelings) and explain how their actions contribute to the sequence of events.

the character wants to win, gain, get, or achieve during the course of the screenplay.” (Field,

In the following paragraphs I will be analyzing Charlie’s moral personality. Charlie’s moral development characteristics will be deeply analyzed. His characteristics will be assessed and compared to Kohlber’s theory of moral development. I will be giving examples of Charlie’s moral characteristics in relation to Kolhber’s moral theory. The reasons of why the character is not in any of the other stages of development will also be discussed. I will also make comparison of my observations to the different stages of moral development in Charlie’s character. Charlie’s moral behavior differs throughout the movie and goes thru continuous changes.

No I don’t think that state and local governments pass their own laws regulating immigration. What is wrong with allowing them to come to the United States to make a better living for themselves and they family. I feel if they abide by the same rules as we do there shouldn’t be a problem. It is estimated that there are currently ten to eleven million undocumented immigrants in the United States. If they are here, make them legal. The Federal Government said that immigration issues have caused great debate amongst community members. Lawmakers, politicians, interest groups, and civil rights activists have been vocal in voicing their concerns. There shouldn’t be a debate, they just want to fit in and be a part of United

“The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe is an ominous tale, told in retrospect, of a man who visited an old friend, Roderick Usher, who was dying of a mental illness. This visit was quite different then how the narrator believed it would be. The narrator explained the “insufferable gloom” he felt when he saw the mansion, and this dreary feeling only grew stronger the longer he stayed (Poe 1265). The narrator endured the bleak time with his old friend whose condition only worsened. Roderick’s sister was ill as well and eventually died. They buried her in the basement only to have her crawl out alive days later. This shock scared Roderick to death while the sister’s illness finally took her life. The narrator ran out of the mansion completely unnerved as the House of Usher crumbled to the ground.

Polanski influences viewers to abandon the hope they were positioned to develop through the hero Jake’s embodiment of the assumption that good will

Starting Sentence that I will put in eventually. One of these protagonists was Roger from “Thank you Ma’am. Roger was the most effective, because he was honest, he was able to feel remorse, and had the greatest character development. One of the primary reasons why Roger was the most effective, was he was honest. When Roger first meets Mrs. Jones, he was nothing but honest about his motives and what he intended to do with her money. This makes him effective, because it makes him easy to sympathize with, the audience would be able to put themselves in his shoes. Additionally, he was effective,because he was able to show remorse for his actions. Roger did not want to steal from Mrs. Jones, but he had too, he tried to show he was remorseful multiple

The narrative revolves around the question of how to define and understand a character's identity; the character must always be a member of a minority within a larger society; the character is at odds with the minority group of which she is a part; the character is conflicted about her differences from the minority and her differences from the majority (conflicted- wants to please both but not sure how she fits in) (Quizlet Web)

In the book Character Compass, Scott Seider describes three high performing schools who attribute their academic success to an emphasis on character education. Boston Prep emphasizes moral character, while Roxbury Prep focuses on performance character, and Pacific Rim targets civic character. The three models of character education approach character education in three distinctly different ways, yet there are common threads weaving through all three models. First, all of the schools have regular community meetings as part of their character education programs. The community meetings are meaningful and productive, as they engage students and provide them with a sense of ownership of their character development. Another common thread is the philosophy of psychologist Erik Erikson, that adolescence is a developmental stage during which students question who they are as individuals, and how they fit into the world around them. Addressing these questions is critical to a successful character education program,

I assert that when I read about characters in a story or write my own story with my own characters, their thoughts become my own and as a result, I see a change in my own character and how I face things everyday. I develop the character traits I deem ‘good’ and learn from the character

While others may focus more Meisner compares the human dialogue to the game of ping pong (22). The game of ping pong is relatively simple, as one person serves the ball, while the other tries to hit it back while both parties continue hit the ball until someone fails to do so. Similar to a real conversation, one person begins by saying something, while the other responds after listening to what was said. The conversation will continue to go on until someone fails to so something worth responding to. Now Meisner believed that in order to reproduce a realistic human dialogue as opposed to actors just reading the script was by making sure that the actors had a connection with one another. A way to accomplish this was by making sure that the everything that the actor says or does was in direct response to what had happened or was said, basing everything off of the other person. By doing this, the actor is able to portray life like human dialogue, in a made up

This article written by Marvin W. Berkowitz focuses on answering three questions regarding character education. The questions are “what is character education,” “does character education work,” and “what is effective character education?” The ratio of discussion per question is roughly 1:3:6, respectively. Berkowitz informs the readers that character education is truly a complex topic and concept, and Berkowitz classifies character education as rocket science (even using scientific descriptors). By stating that character education complicated, educators are comforted in case they have had failed attempts at establishing a productive character education program in their classrooms. The simple way to view character education is a blend of pro-social

This now brings us to Coplan’s third and final level of the character engagement: called character “allegiance”. Coplan (2009:102) describes this as a process through which a film leads its

There are many reasons why audience members favor a certain character over the other especially in narratives. Bilandzic (2011) argues that if a narrative provides individuals with all the necessary information needed to form moral judgments, infer causality, represent meaningful experiences and have plausible emotions, then the characters are believable. These readers or viewers are able to recreate the cognitive and emotional processes that the character/s are experiencing. According to Krakowiak and Oliver (2012) when a character's behavior reveals their moralities and personalities, audience members are able to identify or like that character more. Likewise, viewers are consistently

1) In order to have a meaningful experience in a dramatic activity, the performer that organized the activity must keep in mind that their main role is “the agent of change”. This role provides them with the responsibility of being in charge of how the participants as a whole gets transformed with the purpose of improving their lives by satisfying the group’s needs. The performer must be able to develop a logical and understandable method for discovering what their target audience lacks as a result of their current situation. They then must focus on how to articulate and portray goal(s) of the performance in a way that allows the actors to learn as they act. Dwight Conquergood supported this idea through his selfless contributions with numerous marginalized groups: ranging from Hmong refugees to local street gangs. He was able to form a deep enough connection with his groups that even lead to him finding homes, employment, and even serving as an advocate for their court cases. Howard Gardner would describe the idea of the performer as an agent of change to be an example of a role that somebody with a lot of interpersonal intelligence– that is, having an understanding of other people’s feelings– should have.