Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein are arguably two of the most famous journalists ever. Their work on the Watergate case has gone down as some of the best investigative journalism, won them Pulitzer prizes, afforded them a book deal, turned their story into a movie, and ultimately solidified their legacies as journalists. Bob Woodward got his start at the Washington Post in 1972, where he worked alongside Carl Bernstein. During the summer of 1972, Bob Woodward was assigned a story about a burglary and the Democratic National Convention. When he kept pressing the story, he learned that something was awry. It was then that Bernstein joined Woodward and the two young reporters worked on multiple pieces of investigative journalism to try and
On June 17, 1972, Woodward was asked to cover a story for his job at the "Washington Post." There had been a burglary at the Watergate hotel. When he arrived at the newsroom, he discovered that this wasn 't an ordinary burglary, and he wasn 't the only one reporting on it. The burglars had broken into the headquarters of the Democratic national committee in the Watergate office-apartment-hotel-complex. Bernstein had the same assignment. The two men had no appreciation for each other.
An hour later four trucks and one truck with an M-60 mounted in the bed drove into town. Raising his hand, Jackson signaled his men to hold fire until they had the vehicles between them as he pulled his left arm out of the sling before wrapping it around the rifle sling and taking careful aim. Firing his first shot, Jackson took out the right front tire of the truck with the M-60 with his second round taking out the back right tire, effectively stopping the truck in the middle of the road. After those shots, his men followed suit, flattening the tires on the rest of the trucks with their well-placed rounds. Under fire with immobile vehicles, the militiamen quickly dove out of their vehicles and tried to return fire at their unseen enemy on the rooftops.
McCord Jr. broke into the Democratic National Committee’s offices at the Watergate complex. Felt, now second in command, was asked to be in charge of the FBI’s investigation in the burglary and to determine if there was any White House involvement. Two Washington Post reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, discovered the burglary was bigger than just a burglary. They began to ask for details from Mark Felt. Felt then decided to go under the name of “Deep Throat,” in order to give information without his identity known. Felt, or Deep Throat, revealed to Woodward and Bernstein that Howard Hunt, former CIA agent and a Nixon staff member was involved in the Watergate scandal. This lead in the investigation led to the journalist revealing one of the biggest political scandals in history. The information given to Woodward and Bernstein by “Deep Throat” helped reveal the secrets of the Nixon administration and this eventually led to Nixon being the first president to ever resign from office. During this time, “Deep Throat” was not revealed to the public until May 31,
Bob Edwards’ Edward Murrow and the Birth of Broadcast Journalism is a short biography about the man that established and revolutionized broadcast journalism. Bob Edwards has ample experience in broadcast journalism as a radio news and talk show host for over 30 years (Biography.com). It is no surprise that Edwards takes a particular interest in writing about Edward Murrow since he certainly influenced Edwards’ career in radio news. While he conducted most of his research through secondary sources, he relied heavily on books by close co-workers of Murrow. With that said, Edward Murrow and the Birth of Broadcast Journalism is a great streamlined tale of Murrow’s journey from a logger, to an education advocate, to broadcast journalism.
At this time, only one other impeachment inquiry existed, so Bernstein and Woodward’s work had to be as accurate as possible. They made sure of this through a few precautionary measures. First, they agreed never to let an article go to print unless they both fully agreed the article was worthy of printing should. When they were investigating the truth of a fact or statement, they always made sure that they checked it with at least two sources. When they made a large implication, such as that of H.R. Haldeman, Assistant to the President, they investigated with as many as four or five sources. To make sure that they were not overly ambitious or biased, they frequently ran their story ideas, topics, and facts, over with their editors, Sussman and Rosenfeld.
Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward were the investigative reporters to the Watergate scandal. Bernstein was a reporter at the Washington Post; he had
Based on the two articles the Watergate events changed American views towards politics and politicians. One way that I view the differences is that
Bob Woodward was a reporter whom worked for the Washington Post. This reporter investigated the Watergate scandal. He was also known to be in contact with an insider known to the public as Deep Throat. Another reporter working for the Washington Post was Carl Bernstein. This man worked alongside Bob Woodward on the Watergate scandal. Without these two dedicated reporters, the Watergate scandal could have easily been forgotten, as other papers chose to ignore the matter.
Scott, Foreign Editor: Look, there are two thousand reporters in this town, are there five on Watergate? When did the Washington Post suddenly get the monopoly on wisdom? Why would the Republicans do it? McGovern's self-destructed just like Humphrey, Muskie, the bunch of them. I don't believe
Through the actions of the two reporters, the exposure of Watergate incident came face to face with the audience really for the first time, not making it “real” but making it something more understandable. Seeing this had a direct affect on the views of political parties itself; as far as the liberal views it was a positive impact because they had the upper hand and helped expose the other side showing them (the republicans) as the bad guy; the conservatives were shown as a more negative connotation which is self explanatory but they were shown violating the publics best interest in the most common terms. This movie could easily be a token of the importance of the First Amendment and the power of the press and what it really should be with the pre-establishments. The press is one establishment that needed to revamp their purposes because of the backlash of the film. The press at the time of mid 70’s was very important, they were always rallying for the rights and freedoms of people but late 70’s this changed as a they became a business power serving their own personal
In the first article that I read, written by D Burch from the Harvard Crimson web site, it obvious that their stance on Nixon and Watergate were that of defense; defending Nixon’s actions. It is obvious to me that they were in support of his choices and condoned most of his actions. They did report that the editorial staff called for his impeachment but it was reluctant at best. Basically they said that his office of President was hard and that he had done many a great thing prior to this scandal including honorably ending US involvement in war, bringing home our warriors and POW’s from Southeast Asia, establishing a new candor in relations with the Soviet Union, among others (Burch, 1974). The second article on the other hand was more of
All The President’s Men All The President’s Men depicts the scandal of Watergate and the developing story leading up to President Nixon’s resignation. The story begins with two reporters of the Washington Post, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, and they first encounter and begin to investigate it. Along the way their editor blocks them because their story lacks, until Woodward meets with an anonymous source named Deep Throat. Deep throat then tells him secret info that totally blows opens the story. This then leads to the senate hearings of Watergate and then later, the impeachment of the president.
The movie “All the President's Men” (1976), is based on the work of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein two Washington Post newspaper writers, who uncovered the cover-up of the White House's involvement in the Democratic Party National headquarters, Watergate, break-in. At first, Bob Woodward discovers what seems to be a minor break-in but is surprised to find that top lawyers were already on the defense case. He also discovers that names and addresses of Republican fund organizers were being accused, which further aroused his suspicions. When he brings this to the attention of the head of the Washington Post, he is prepared to run with the story and assigns Woodward and Carl Bernstein to it. Their findings of this
At the beginning of the scandal Bernstein and Woodward were 28 and 29, respectively. Bernstein and Woodward were not partners. Bernstein looked as if he belonged to the Counterculture, while Woodward had "Establishment credentials."1 They appeared to be complete opposites and did not get along very well, but over the course of their investigations, they realized they could work well together. They became involved in the Watergate investigation when they received a call. The call came from Alfred E. Lewis, a veteran of the police force, who moonlighted as an informant for the Post.
details to the press during the height of the Watergate scandal, especially to Washington Post’s