What Are The Checks And Balances Of The Constitution

The legislative branch is also the “only part of the government that can make new laws or change existing laws.”("white house"). A society is formed and controlled by rules and regulations, those who make these rules and regulations basically control society. The president does have the power to veto any law he doesn’t approve of, but if Congress is in accord with the Senate they can “override his veto with two thirds vote of each chamber.”("white house") ounce again subordinating the president . When the legislative branch has both houses in coalition with each other the executive branch really has no power over the legislative branch.

The picture shows a tree with branches cut off with a chainsaw. The part of the tree still left is holding a chainsaw and is labeled executive branch. The two branches cut off are the judicial and legislative showing the executive branch has more power than the other 2 branches. However in our government there has never been problems with checks and balances. In document 4 it says, ‘’ The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities…..

If the president gets out of hand, the legislative branch can impeach the president, the legislative branch can also approve laws that got vetoed with enough votes. “The Constitution had created the branches, executive, judicial,

The United States guards against tyranny by creating a system of checks and balances. The system of checks balances made sure that no one branch of government had more power than another. The executive branch has the power to nominate judges for the judicial branch; while the judicial branch can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. The judicial branch can check on the legislative branch by declaring laws unconstitutional. Meanwhile, the legislative branch (the Senate) can confirm the President’s nomination for a

The division of powers into three branches makes it impossible for any one person or group to single handedly control every aspect of it. The three different powers, judicial, legislative, and executive, divide the powers equally among them. Since its separated into three powers, no power has total control of the country(Doc. 1). None of the powers can take actions without before asking the two other powers about it. This limits the president’s abilities to take the decisions he wants for the country. It also upholds the judicial branch to pass laws without the consent of the Executive and Legislative branches. Due to this system, for a branch to be able to convey ideas for the nation it needs the supermajority of the

The vision of the founders of the Constitution was to create an energetic presidential fashion in which the president has enough energy to lead the nation yet be constrained to not threaten the liberty of the people. The lesson many Americans learned from their experience with the British was that liberty is threatened by executive power and safeguarded by legislative power (pg. 3). The framers were cautious of the responsibilities the executive branch would have so that tyranny would be prevented. The Framers created a democracy that prevents any branch from overstepping its constitutionally assigned limits, including the presidents. The framers decision was influenced by their experiences without an executive branch while the British government was under King George III. The

These men defined the distinct powers of the President, the Congress, and the Legislative Branch, creating an effective separation of powers that would deliver a system of checks and balances, making sure that none of these branches would have excessive powers. In Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the President, however, was vested with the power to issue Executive Orders. Through these Executive Orders, the President has broad power to issue executive directives, making him the Commander in Chief, and the person who “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully

According to document C the judicial branch may declare executive or legislative acts unconstitutional, the executive branch may veto legislative acts and appoint members of the supreme court, and the legislative branch may override a veto(with a two thirds majority) and amend the Constitution. The system of checks and balances protects against tyranny because it keeps each branch of government from misusing its powers. The branches cannot become too powerful if another branch has a way of nullifying the actions of

To prevent from one branch of government having all power, and therefore having tyranny, (Madison FP # 47) Checks and Balances was added to the defenses of the constitution. There are three branches of government: Legislative Branch (Congress), Executive Branch (President), and Judicial Branch (The Courts). These three branches work together to check one another to make sure the power is evenly distributed and balanced, hence the name Checks and Balances. The way it works is that the Legislative Branch (Congress) can check the Executive Branch (President) by approving Presidential nominations, being able to override a President’s veto, and can impeach the President, him or her, from office. The Legislative Branch can check the Judicial Branch by having Senate confirm Presidential nominations and by being able to impeach judges and remove them from office. The President can check the Legislative Branch by vetoing Congressional legislation, and can check the Judicial Branch by nominating judges. The Judicial Branch can check the Legislative Branch by declaring laws unconstitutional, and can check the Executive Branch by declaring presidential acts unconstitutional. (Madison FP # 51) All three branches of government work together to make sure no branch is abusing their limited power, by using the system Checks and

The constitution splits the power given to national government into three branches, which are separate from each other: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. The separation of powers was based on the ideas of Montesquieu, with him ‘L’esprit de lois’ which means the spirit of the law. The executive plays the role of administrating law. The president does this in many ways , for example he; executes federal laws and programs, conducts foreign policy , commands the armed forces, negotiates treaties and other such roles. Checks and balances another main factor of the constitution comes in here, as the people get to keep a check on the president every 4 years with the presidential election, which stops any tyranny of powers. This can also be seen in another branch of government. The legislature passes law, this is done through congress. Congress is made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Its roles include;

A second example of the separate branches being able to check each other if Congress feels that the president is being unconstitutional then they have the power to impeach him or her(Document C). This prevents against tyranny because if the president was making horrible decision that would ultimately destroy the country then Congress could stop that from happening by taking him or her out of power. Another scenario is if the president ended up being an American born spy for another country. If the Constitution did not give Congress the power to impeach or give power to the Court to declare decisions unconstitutional, then the president could bend America to the other countries

Please explain how the Constitution provides for a system of separation of powers and checks and balances.

The three branches of government are supposed to balance each other out equally so none of them has more power than the other. Congress can pass laws, the president can veto, Congress can override a veto, and the Supreme Court can decide whether or not a law is unconstitutional through judicial review. While it all seems to be an equal balance, there has been debate on whether or not the Supreme Court actually has more power over the other branches. Judicial review gives the court the power to override both the president and Congress based on the fact that the court decides if a law is unconstitutional or not. The president can veto Congress, but Congress can counter that by overriding his veto. Once the Supreme court decides whether or not

Most of the specifications for the executive branch in the Constitution, other than how he is to be elected, have to deal with the interactions between Congress and the President. The president can (fill in the blank) but only if (this part) of Congress approves. The powers of the president have been interpreted widely so that he has more power than I believe the Framers intended. They wanted him to be able to check Congress with veto power and be the head of the military. However, I think that presidents nowadays have too much power. They are active in trying force their policy agenda through Congress, manage foreign relations, and act as the administrative head of the entire nation. The textbook lays it out well in, "The vast size of the executive branch and the number and complexity of decisions that must be made each day pose a challenge for the White House.” (316) In order to deal with the stresses put on the executive branch, there are thousands of employees that work to give the president the information that he needs to make decisions. He has advisors, cabinet members, legislative liaisons; the list goes on and on, but he is the person who actually gets to make all of the choices. The President is limited in some ways and given more power in other ways by the structure laid out for him in the Constitution, and evolved to be what it is now.

Imagine if the entire American government system was operated entire by the president. Every decision, law, and court ruling determined by only one person. There is no room for debate or questioning, ultimately leading to the abuse of power and authority. While this may seem completely absurd, many believe that this is not very far away from actual truth. Due to the uneven use of checks and balances among the three branches of government, it has resulted in the executive branch of the American government gaining too much power, therefore leaving the original intent of the constitution to be changed and unenforced.