Hook. Both during and before The Revolutionary War happened, Britain killed many of the Patriots who fought against independence from Britain. King George III made laws that took advantage of the colonists and Britain did not give them equal rights. The Patriots were justified in seeking independence from England, because England abused the colonists, capitalized on them, and controlled their rights.
One reason the Patriots were right for wanting to separate from England is that they were abused by England. On March 5, 1770, the Boston Massacre took place. “This fight was a clash between the British soldiers and the Boston Colonists (Garcia R44).” During the massacre, five colonists were killed by the British soldiers. After this event took
…show more content…
Another example of when England abused the colonists, is at the Battle of Lexington and Concord. This battle was perceived as an act of aggression that drove the colonists further from England. Another example of when Britain abused the colonist is when the Writs of Assistance was placed upon the colonies. The Writs of Assistance was a search warrant that permitted British officers to go through colonists’ houses or businesses to see if there were any smuggled goods. By doing this Britain offended many colonists who thought it was improper for the soldiers to be able to charge in and demand the right to look through their property. Britain's overall goal was to maintain control of the colonies, but by harming the people they ruined their relationship. This further drove the colonist towards revolution. When the colonies declare their independence from Britain they made a list of complaints and reasons why they want separation. One grievance that is …show more content…
One way England controlled their rights was through placing restrictions on trade. When this rule was implemented the colonist grew angry. Not only did Britain not have all the supplies that the colonies needed but they taxed very high on all of the goods the colonies needed or wanted. Another example of when England controlled the colonists rights is when King George III closed their congress and said that Parliament had supreme rule over the colonies. In this instance King George III eliminated colonial self-governance, so that they would be less likely to uprise. The Patriots responded to this by becoming more frustrated with the king and increased their desire for independence. Another example of when England controlled the colonies rights is when they revolt the right to a fair trial for the colonist accused of wrongdoing. If the colonists was accused of a wrongdoing by Britain, the British would capture them and send them to England for a trial. The trial would occur in England rather in the colonies. The colonists could not defend themselves because no one in England would defend them making for a very unfair legal process. This is in contrast to what happened after the Boston Massacre, when the colonists gave the five British soldiers a fair trial. During the trial, the accused British soldiers were given John Adams, who is one of the best
On July 29, 1775 a gunfire went off in Lexington, Massachusetts. It was the shot heard round the world and the beginning of the American Revolution. This revolution was between the British and the Colonists in America. The revolution caused the colonists to dissolve their political bands with Britain. This essay is to explain how the colonists were justified in going to war with great britain. First of all, the king violates the English bill of rights. Second, The king was punishing the colonists with taxation acts. Thirdly, the colonists had no real representation in parliament. So, all of these reasons justified the colonists in going to war with britain.
In 1775 the British treated the colonists badly. The colonists decided they did not want to be treated badly so they chose to fight back. The colonists were separated in two, Loyalists and Patriots. Loyalists were the colonists who chose to stay loyal to the British. Patriots were the colonists who wanted independence and were willing to fight for it. The British believed that the colonists stood no chance against their forces because the British had more troops and ammunition. The colonists did not even have a real army.
The colonists have the ability to justify their means of revolting because of Great Britain’s actions. One example of this occurs after the French and Indian War. The colonists fought the French and Indian War for the sole purpose of western expansion. They sacrificed their time, money, and lives for this cause. Yet, after they won the war, the British government passed the Proclamation Act . In this, King
One of the reasons for the colonies breaking away from Britain was how King George mistreated them. We can see this in Document 7, as Jefferson writes about the grievances the colonies have against him. He implores the king to be more “open...to liberal and expanded thought”. Still the king ignores both the Olive Branch Petition and Declaration of Rights and Grievances that the Continental Congress sends him. This shows his lack of care for the colonies. Another mistreatment that the colonists receive from the British is the Boston Massacre. This event raised tensions in the the colonies against the British, who were perceived as attacking unarmed citizens. Soldiers killed innocent people that night with guns, angering many colonists. Finally, the Intolerable Acts were a large reason that the colonists felt justified in declaring independence. Document 15 by Samuel Adams talks about how the colony of Boston is punished for the Boston Tea party “by the shutting of the harbor and other marks of revenge”. The retaliation from the British after the protest in Boston Harbor was an overreaction that angered many colonists. There
About a decade before the American Revolution happened in 1775, there were lots of tension building up between the colonists and the British. The colonists did not like being under British rule and control because they liked freedom and wanted independence. However, the British government attempted to raise tax revenues by imposing more taxes on the colonists to pay for the leftover debts from the Indian-French War. Some of the laws passed include the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Tariffs of 1767, and the Tea Act of 1773. Some events that escalated the tension include the Boston Massacre, the Boston Tea Party, etc. The colonists were justified in rebelling against Britain.
One example of where their actions could not be considered valid was the Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party served as a protest against Parliament and their passing of the Tea Act. The act created a monopoly for the British East India Company whose main investor was the king of Britain. It allowed the company to not pay any taxes which was unjust in the eyes of the colonists; as they have every mean to think so. However, their response was childish and immature. George Hewes, a participant in this event, provides an eyewitness account. He says that a group of men, disguised as Indians snuck aboard three ships with the tea and dumped it into the Boston Harbour. Millions of dollars of tea were wasted and all for a single protest. There were so many other options the colonists could have taken, but instead, they chose to do one that was completely uncalled for and not well founded. This concept was played another time. The colonists were upset at the many taxes imposed by the British government. The taxes were steep and unfair, and some of them only the colonists were forced to pay. In hopes of getting the attention of the British, a group of men began to tar and feather British commissioners including John Malcolm. Depictions of this process prove that it was brutal and a form of public humiliation. Also, other variations of actual violence against property occurred. Ultimately, these actions are completely uncalled for, and in no way beneficial to the colonies. Although the Parliament upset the colonists by implementing harsh taxes, there is by no means any justification to their
The British were cruel, forceful, and just plain mean. Colonists asked the British for their rights, but no, the British would not give them their rights. Britain was a horrible country, and they didn’t listen to the Colonists, although they were usually right.
“Give me liberty or give me death!” Patrick Henry. I believe that the Colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain and the King. King George was making the Colonists pay very unfair taxes, he was trying to rule over them from all the way over in England, and he wouldn’t take the colonies legislators opinions into consideration. While some people may say that the Colonists were just unappreciative, that is not correct. They continued to stay with the King until the King turned on them and made them do things they didn’t want to do and shouldn’t have to do.
Under the rule of King George III, many colonists felt robbed of their rights and freedoms. Consistently abused by the British government, the colonists decided to ask for freedom. The colonists were considered citizens of Great Britain, therefore forcing them to follow any of Great Britain’s laws. Colonists learned to depend on Britain for supplies and products to help their economy, which increased Britain’s economy as well. The colonists had to listen and obey all ranges of Britain’s government and faced consequences if they rebelled. The passing of these three acts limited the colonist’s privileges and resulted in them yearning for freedom. The Tea Act, Stamp Act and Intolerable Acts were the most important in leading the colonists to writing the Declaration of Independence.
The American Revolution should never have happened. The British were not tyrannical, oppressive rulers although the American colonies perceived them to be so. The American colonists misperceptions led to revolution and independence.
The American Revolution was a battle that began in 1776 and ended in 1781. The main cause for the war was because the American colonists wanted to separate from Britain. There were many reasons as to why they thought this including the belief that Britain needed the colonists consent to tax them. The question is however, were the Patriots actions justified? Did they have the right to oppose their kings rulings such as taxation and expansion west in sacrificially violent manners?
The colonist’s rebellious reaction to the British King and Parliaments actions led to their American Revolution. Did the colonists rebel in a justice form or was Great Britain taking advantage of them? Did the methods they used like the Boston Tea Party and Boston Massacre proper? Was Great Britain right not to include colonists to represent in Parliament? Was it right for Great Britain to tax the colonists or were the colonists right to revolt? The leading events toward the American Revolution started when the colonist objected paying taxes to Great Britain. They felt it violated their rights as British people because the acts were passed in England without a colonial representative. Not only did the British taxation cause their revolution, but it was also a unifying force in the colonies. After gaining France’s North American territory in the Seven Years war, Britain faced huge debt and the responsibility of a massive land. The purpose for this land was to gather the resources and make extra profit to benefit England. Before Great Britain started enforcing taxes and acts, the colonists lived a life of prosperity and governed themselves. Great Britain showed salutary neglect towards them, and due to this, the colonists were not willing to be “tied down” with their governing. They argued The French and Indian War wasn’t their responsibility and the British shouldn’t tax them without representation, while the British
The colonists in America had enjoyed relative freedom from England since they arrived. They came to the New World, after all to escape England, for whatever reasons they may have had-religious, economic, or social. So when England decided in the eighteenth century that they were going to crack down on the colonies, the announcement was not met with open arms. In fact, rebellion was inevitable.
The American Revolution was justified because the colonists were not being treaty fairy and equally by the British. And according to Jefferson, “people being oppressed have a moral obligation to rebel against their oppressors”. From the beginning, the colonists were not given the full rights as British men, just because they were not living in that country. The Navigation Acts passed by the Parliament to restrict colonial trade, and all of colonial trade with Europe had to go through England, overall they wanted to keep colonies in a position of economic dependency on Britain. And that was a serious damage in the colonial economies and people’s aspirations, it makes many colonists unhappy and smuggle goods to other country. And British
While the colonists were settling down in America, Great Britain was like a guard dog that watched vigilantly on their every move. The colonists didn’t realize this issue until soldiers from Great Britain migrated overseas just to block off ports and intimidate them. Once, Great Britain knew that they had the colonist in their grasps, they started implementing Acts. For example, the Townshend Act which imposed taxes on glass, lead, paints, paper and tea imported into the colonies as well as the Stamp act which required colonists to pay taxes on every single piece of paper that was used in the colonies. This was the tea that helped wake the colonists up and made them push or desiring liberty. This sudden rebellious behavior was the fuel that powered the Revolutionary Period and was further enhanced by the