Website Critique For A Website

Education of patients and families regarding the reliability of internet information is prudent. Given the enormous amount of information available via the World Wide Web, not all of which, as you illustrate, is reliable, it is of great importance that patients and families comprehend the unreliability of some of the information they may acquire. Patients who are unable to gain access to health care secondary to a lack of funds, insurance, or availability of their provider, may be inclined to review their symptoms utilizing a search engine. Moreover, patients who were incapable of accessing healthcare due to reasons other than a lack of insurance are more likely to utilize the internet to obtain health related

Privacy Notice: While CDC does not collect personally identifiable information (PII) during your visit to this site, you will, however, be asked to provide your e-mail address should you decide to register for the online training. Please note that is not necessary to register for the training in order to use this site; your registration is purely voluntary. Any information that you provide is fully protected; it is stored temporarily and used only for the online training registration

Retrieved from http://www.marchofdimes.org/professionals/medical-resources.aspx). Office of the Medical Director and outside experts review all clinical information presented on the site (Marchofdimes.org, 2015). All the clinical material is based upon scientific research and the collective experience of practicing physicians and other health care providers (Marchofdimes.org, 2015). The “March of Dimes” regularly reviews all material to ensure that it is accurate, appropriate, and in accord with the leading important health professional organizations (Medical Resources | March of Dimes. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.marchofdimes.org/professionals/medical-resources.aspx). The privacy section explains how the “March of Dimes” collects personal information when you sign up with them by making a donation or creating an account (Marchofdimes.org, 2015). Personal information is only shared with consent, however, not shared for the purpose of companies to solicit the

I will compare the information available from two major online medical resources to see what type of audience they are targeting and how the information is communicated. The topic that I will be chosen is diabetes. The websites that I will be getting my sources are from Medicinenet (http://www.medicinenet.com/diabetes_mellitus/article.htm) and the CDC centers for disease control and prevention (http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/home/index.html).

It is interesting to learn that the Immunization Action Coalition works closely and partly funded by the CDC. They maintain and posts various vaccines for state mandates and policies.

Promote families’ involvement within the CDC through weekly parent newsletter, parent workshops, school functions, and by also establishing relationships with families.

Why are they providing the site? This site is provided in order to provide information on different treatment options, along with statistics and data collected. Also if you need any type of state contact/ program information, this is also available plus much more. The CDC also has information on all the health crises we currently face. After looking over the site the CDC seems like a pretty good go to site for research and information on disease control and prevention.

Caveat lector is a Latin phrase meaning, “let the reader beware.” Health information on the internet is growing at an alarming rate. However, some information on the internet is not accurate or current, and unfortunately, many web sites regarding healthcare offer misleading, incomplete, and incorrect information. Many consumers do not have the knowledge to judge and evaluate the quality of online information. This paper aims to discuss how the website WebMD presents information to readers. It will evaluate WebMD according to its source, where was the source obtained; type of funding, is it commercially funded or private; the validity and quality, how valid is the information and can it be verified; and privacy, is your personal information

As serious as we are about credibility, we also know that at times, health information can as well as should be engaging, exciting, as well as entertaining.

Reading this site, it is easy to see that this publication of information if from a trusted professional association that has been around for some time, approximately over 100 years to be exact. The site seems to be very accurate in its information that it reports. The Mayo Clinic team works alongside a team and slew of medical professionals and experts that provide them with the necessary information, research and clinical evaluations in order to present valuable and useful information (Mayoclinic.org, 2014). Because of the wealth of various medical professionals that readily participate and are active members of this team and staff, you can trust that the information is not coming from a mere bias approach of being a single person or single minded organization, but from people who come from different backgrounds and bring different experiences to the table all for the same common goal.

* Checking the information against reliable sources, including the National Practitioner Data Bank and the American Board of Medical Specialties

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was founded in 1946 (www.cdc.gov, n.d.). The CDC is one of the thirteen agencies that operates under the Department of Health and Human Services which is, "…the principal agency in the United States government for protecting the health and safety of all Americans…" (www.cdc.gov, n.d.). "Today, CDC is globally recognized for conducting research and investigations and

Determining the credibility of a website starts with tools that can be used to evaluate the site. The National Library of Medicine (NLM) offers information defining how to evaluate websites credibility. Key factors such as; “Who runs and pays for the website, what the website’s purpose is, Where did the information on the site come from and how is

For individuals faced with a cancer diagnosis, information seeking plays a crucial role in their ability to cope with their diagnosis as well as treatment options. To make decisions, patients require information about their disease, treatment options that outline the benefits and risks, as well as alternative treatments and their prognosis (Rutten, Arora, Bakos, Aziz, & Rowland, 2005). Modern technology has provided patients with access to a plethora of information, particularly as it relates to Cancer, furthermore with the internet becoming a primary source of information it is of importance that patients seeking health information become proficient in assessing the credibility of websites (Schwarz & Ringel Morris, 2011). One instrument to aid in assessing the quality of treatment information in DISCERN. Through utilizing this tool, an evaluation of the Canadian Cancer Society Website cancer.ca will be presented to determine the quality of this websites content specifically as it relates to treatment information for cancer.

Web sites are just like magazines, newspapers, brochures, menus, or even directions on how to make nitroglycerin from house-hold goods, in that they all have to be put together in such a manner that whoever is reading or browsing over it will be able to clearly distinguish this from that. In this sense, a critique of any particular web site will have justification, while carefully considering also that this is an altogether new medium of information exchange. Now, all of this talk of togetherness is actually a general reference to basic design principles, such as color coordination, if color is used, text size, font choice/ style, art integration, accessibility, and just plain and simple design of the page. For