There is evidence that Casey Anthony lived an immature lifestyle for a mother, but there is not enough evidence to prove that she is guilty for the murder of her daughter. In order for one to understand that Casey Anthony is not guilty for the murder of her daughter, they must take a look at her background, the evidence of the murder, the trial, and the public’s reaction to the case. Along with these significant points, they must ask themselves the same question Jose Baez once wondered, “Why did George Anthony try to kill himself?”. The clues that point to Casey as the murderer equally point right back to George. In Warren, Ohio on March 19, 1986, Casey Marie Anthony was born. She was the youngest child of the family. She has an older brother, …show more content…
However, this secret was not easy to hide. Casey’s mother, Cindy Anthony, believed her when she told her that she was a virgin. While her family just assumed she was gaining weight, seven months later the pregnancy was obvious. A friend of Casey’s shared that Casey did not want to have the child. At her young age she was not ready for a responsibility like that. This could be a main factor as to why she kept it a secret for so long. She was also concerned what her family would think. However, Cindy, her mother, insisted that she keep it instead of giving the child up for adoption. At the time Casey was engaged to a man named Jesse Grund (“Casey Anthony Bio.”). Jesse Grund treated Caylee as his own daughter even when it was proven she was not his child. Though Caylee’s real father was never identified, she was still loved. Jesse Grund’s family took Casey and Caylee in as their own. Though Casey was known for her habits of lying, she was still loved and supported by family members. She and Caylee were cared for. They were supported and lived with her family. Caylee Marie had a relationship with everyone in the family. They had a deep love for her ("Casey Anthony Biography.”). Friends and Family have said that Casey loved Caylee and was a good mother. She never abused her or talked harshly about the child, regardless to the inconvenience of being a young mother. It was obvious she …show more content…
Casey responded with the same excuse she had been using. She told her once again that she was at her nanny’s house sleeping. After Cindy called the police on Casey out of frustration, they went to the Anthony’s home. Lee, her older brother, was waiting on them. Cindy called the police once again. She reported a missing child this time. She told the operator that Casey would not tell her where her granddaughter was and that she had stolen her money. While the police were on their way to the Anthony’s home, Lee cracked Casey. He was trying to persuade Casey to tell them where the three-year old was to make things easier, rather than getting the police involved. Casey eventually cracked and informed Lee that she had not seen Caylee in thirty-one days. When Cindy overheard this information she called 9-1-1 again. This time Cindy stated that the child had been missing for a month and her nanny was the last person she had been seen with. Informing them that Casey said she was looking for Caylee through other sources, she also reported the strong stench she had smelt in Casey’s car. George Anthony arrived at his house before the police did. His response to the news was short. All George Anthony said to hearing that his granddaughter had been missing for thirty-one days was, “What?”. As the officers arrived to the house, Cindy and Lee were overwrought. Casey and George were described to be strangely
Once Phillip trusted Jaycee to keep quiet, she was allowed to go in public for the first time in over ten years. She begged with her eyes for someone to ask her if she was the girl that had been missing for so long, but no one did. That was, until a female cop’s motherly instincts told her something was up with Jaycee and her daughter’s behavior around the Garridos. Although she couldn’t legally arrest him, she called his parole officer after doing a background check and digging up his offense as a pedophile. He was then arrested at his home and Jaycee and her
In this article, “Who Killed the Jeff Davis 8”, Ethan Brown, the author, attempted to solve the murder case and prove the police authorities to being wrong and being responsible for the murders of the town. The main problem of this article is determining who is responsible for the murders of those eight women everyone’s contradicting stories. In an attempt to figure out what really happened Brown includes factual evidence from interviews and shocking statistics to inform the reader of what’s going on in the article. By providing such information, Brown indulges the audience into the full experience of solving the murder case.
Steven Avery, a family man, a victim of injustice and an accused murderer. One may have reasoned that his murder conviction was a crime of passion, due to the injustice Steven suffered from his 1985 false conviction of rape and assault, but that may have been before his story caught national attention. A documentary, “Making a Murderer”, directed by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, arose from his story’s infamy. With this documentary came numerous questions as to Avery’s possible innocence, but above all else answers that shed light on a possibly corrupt justice system that appears intent on framing Steven Avery for Teresa Halbach’s murder. “Making a Murderer” effectively portrays a message of the injustice of Steven Avery’s murder conviction and possible corruption within the Manitowoc’s justice system through the use of footage and accounts from people who were involved with his conviction.
“The only two people that know I am innocent, is myself and the killer.” Imagine being blamed for a crime you did not commit, and nobody would believe you no matter what you said. Steven Truscott had forty-two years of his life taken from him for being charged with a crime he did not commit. He was charged at only the age of fourteen for murdering and raping twelve year old Lynne Harper. He then became the youngest death-row inmate after one of the most famous trials in the history of Canada. Steven Truscott should never have been convicted for the murder and rape of Lynne Harper due to the fact the forensic evidence was questionable the
Caylee Anthony’s murder was not a random act, but rather an exact plan that was put into place leading up to and after her death. When she disappeared in July 2008, Caylee Anthony was two years old and her mother, Casey Anthony, was an outgoing twenty-two year old. Due to Casey’s frequent partying and drinking, she claimed the identity of Caylee’s father was unknown, but he may have died in a car crash before Caylee’s birth. While the father of Caylee is unclear, Casey’s grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony, were highly involved in Caylee 's life. In Orlando, Florida, the Anthony family carried on their lives as normal until July 2008 when Cindy called 911 reporting ‘“I found out my granddaughter has been taken, she has been missing for a month’” (Escherich). On that hot summer day, the Anthony household was changed forever. Immediately, Casey Anthony was questioned for not reporting Caylee’s disappearance for over a
One of the most controversial and polemic trials of all times since the OJ Simpson trial was the case of Casey Anthony and the murder of her two year old daughter. All the evidences and witness revealed that she was the main suspect in the murder of her daughter; however in 2011 she was found not guilty of this murder due to several different aspects. This paper will inform and provide the reader with detailed information about this case. In addition the reader will find out what was the outcome of this case and will provide the evidence and will summarize the criminal procedures that occurred from arrest through appeal. The elements of the crime and the evidence which prove that she was guilty will be
The “performers” of the trial played a crucial role in the trial, the verdict and the informal perceptions of Casey Anthony. The prosecutor and defense both played contrasting roles in shaping their client/opponent legally and informally, in the media. The
The purpose of this paper is to discuss and analyze the practices conducted by law enforcement during the investigation of the murder of Ashley Smith. The following pages will discuss the crime scene investigation, the evidence collection, the investigative steps following the initial crime scene investigation, the interviews of witnesses and suspects, and other strategies performed by the acting case investigators. Constitutional challenges have surfaced regarding specific pieces of critical evidence and a section of this paper will analyze the admissibility of this evidence. Lastly this case’s law enforcement processes will be contrasted with textbook processes in an effort to determine the validity of the case’s outcome.
Anthony was born in February of 1820 in Adams, Massachusetts. She was raised in a
George Anthony was Caylee's father.) Casey was used to covering up her hurt, Baez said.
There have been many murder trials in the United States which have gripped the nation, OJ Simpson, BTK, Lee Harvey Oswald. But more shocking to the consciousness of America is the story of a child which has been killed. Such would be the case of Caylee Anthony, and the trial of Casey Anthony. In this assignment the discussion will focus on this case, exposing the much of the drama created by this case.
After reading “the Innocent Man” by Pamela Colloff’s who write a long journalism about Michael Morton, who was found guilty for murdering his wife Christine was sentenced for fifteen years in prison. Later founding that Michael was Innocent after reinvestigating his case, capturing DNA testing and finding new evidence was able to help prove his innocence. The theme of this essay a widow husband who seek to fight for his freedom in prison and staying connected with his son. Michal son Eric gave him a reason to have hope that they would one day reunite and his son would know for himself that he did murder his wife. The point of view of this essay although a man is falsely accuse for a crime he did not commit he is self-determined to fight.
The following criminal analysis shows why Aileen Wuornos was convicted for the murder of six men and what lead up to these actions. These actions were not in self-defense, but out of cold blood. This profile will analyze the following: what lead up to the murder of these men, what Wuornos’s intents were, the evidence and patterns, her personality and characteristics, and her behavior. These facts and evidence will show Wuornos’s intent and motive, and whether or not she was insane. This woman was not born to be a killer, but something in her life drove her to commit these horrible crimes, and this profile will analyze how exactly she did it and why.
The insanity defense of Andrea Yates: The country was absolutely appalled when it heard that Yates, a mother of five children, had killed each of her children resulting in a horrific family slaughter. There were extremely polarized feelings about this case- sympathy (concluding
During, her crime Andrea showed a complete lack of empathy for the lives of her children. One can argue it was brought on by her psychosis, and postpartum depression. It usually said that girl are more likely to show empathy than boys. Given, it was a women, and the societal expectation would be that she should be caring and loving of her children. However, given her mental illness, Andrea was unable to feel those emotions during her crime. Once she was treated, and attended trial you can see that she was remorseful, about what she had done to her children. Sadly, the mental illness had Andrea unable to process any emotions properly. She seem to be hurt that she had done such a crime to her children. One can see how powerful, lack of empathy can play in the role of crime. We see a mother, who temporary lost her since on empathy could do to her own children. One could only imagine that crimes, and acts a person could commit without that taught