Warren Court Case Analysis

In the 1950s the Warren Court were seen to follow a liberal agenda and be judicially active. With a liberal and activist majority on the court the Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways.

In the time that Earl Warren was in command of the Supreme Court, cases such as Miranda vs Arizona, increased our right on accusations. With the Miranda vs Arizona case, Earl Warren made a lasting impact by winning the case and creating what we now

The 14th Chief Justice of the U.S Supreme Court, Earl Warren changed the course the nation through landmark decisions that reflected progressive thinking. With Warren in charge, the Court brought about a significant amount of social change, rooted in establishing racial equality and protecting civil liberties. Despite being nominated on the basis of his conservative governorship, Earl Warren’s s nomination for Chief Justice gave him a new perspective, especially on crime. He now viewed the Court as a protector of the public, and with astounding leadership brought the Court to a consensus in many landmark decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Mapp v. Ohio (1961), and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).

The Plessy V. Ferguson and Brown V. Board of Education are two cases that changed the way that we live today in a quite dramatic way. The Plessy V. Ferguson was a case that promoted segregation. The majority voted for segregation and the minorities opposed the idea and the key precedent that was established after this case was that the U.S. Supreme Court didn't base their trial off of the constitution and instead based their trial upon the statement 'separate but equal'. The Brown V. Board of Education case was a case that completely opposed the idea of 'separate but equal' because the whole case revolved around the fact that a mother wanted her children to go to a school that was easier to get to however it was a school that was only for white children so the mother decided to take the case to court and the majority voted on letting the African American students attend white schools and the minorities voted otherwise. The key precedent that was established after this case was that segregation in schools violates the 14th amendment and it should not be permitted by the U.S. Supreme Court. These two cases were important for the transformation for the America we have today, and they influenced America's thought process and actions significantly.

In an American case, Brown v. Board of Education(1954) and Plessy v. Ferguson(1896), judicial activism has been seen. In both cases, the main issue was race-based segregation. In Plessy v. Ferguson, racial segregation in public facilities was considered to be equal by the Supreme Court of America, whereas in a similar case called Brown v. Board of Education racial segregation of public schooling's was considered to be unequal. In Plessy v. Ferguson the Supreme Court ruled “ separate is equal” because blacks can be treated differently than whites but at the same time be treated equal because of the era that people were living in. The era differentiated the two separate rulings because the judges in Plessy’s case concluded that if they gave blacks the same rights as whites then it would create more problems between the two races, and that it is better for the society because if the Courts struck down the law the most of the white citizens would go against the governments and create more conflicts. Since times have changed and so has the society, the judges could not use the same precedent in the Brown’s case. Hence that, in Plessy v. Ferguson’s case the court ruled separate is equal and in Brown v. School Board of Education ruled separate is not equal because of society's differences. Therefore, the American Supreme Court judges used their own

There were many cases during the civil rights movement that helped shape the world into what it is today. By the middle of the twentieth century, black people had long experienced a physical and social landscape of white supremacy, embedded in policy, social codes, and both intimate and spectacular forms of racial restriction and violence. It was time for a change. The Supreme Court made many decisions to change and affect this movement. Some of these these cases are Dred Scott vs. John F.A. Stanford, Plessy vs. Ferguson, and Shelley vs. Kraemer.

The Supreme Court has significant impact on molding the society of the United States, so does it play an important role in the process of the realization of equal protection on the right to education. From Plessy to Brown, every case that had milestone meaning indicated the evolution on the equal protection of the right to education, and also marked the progress of American civilization. However, there are different points between Plessy and Brown. Brown v. Board of Education was educational case of black race, but Plessy v. Ferguson is not it; the result of Plessy is isolation but equal, the Brown show us that

The Warren Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States between 1953 and 1969, when Earl Warren served as Chief Justice. Warren led a liberal majority that used judicial power in dramatic fashion, to the consternation of conservative opponents. The Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways. One way the Warren Court liberalized America, is through the court cases of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966), where these court cases helped define Due Process and the rights of defendants. Another way the Warren Court liberalized America, is through the cases of Tinker v. Des Moines ISD (1969), Engle v. Vitale (1962), and

In fact, Chief Justice Earl Warren helped the court came to a unanimous decision which was, "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." In fact the court as well mentioned that an education is essential for all children no matter their skin color. Alongside this experience, it made an impact on the United States by deciding to integrate schools. In other words a noticeable moment in the grapple effect for racial equality, (Brown vs. Board of

Chief Justice, Earl Warren stated that the main focus of Brown V. Board of Education, public school segregation violated Equal Protection Laws for African Americans. Brown V. Board of Education case has made many huge changes and influenced everyone in the history. Chief Justice Warren tried to tell the United court to prove that America would not have discriminations and segregations in public schools. In the end, Brown V. Board of Education won the victory against Plessy V.

The Warren Court decided a number of important constitutional issues during its time and those decisions continue to influence our daily lives (Urofsky 253). Warren was appointed Chief Justice in 1953 by President Eisenhower (Earl Warren Biography). During his 16-year tenure, he was one of the most influential advocates for social progress in the United States. During his term he dealt with controversial cases on civil rights and civil liberties and the very nature of the political system. According to Lucas Powe in The Warren Court and American Politics, the Warren Court created the image of the Supreme Court as a revolutionary body, a powerful force for social change. Even though Warren clearly was not the most scholarly justice on the Court his leadership abilities and skill as a statesman enabled him to be an extremely effective Chief Justice. The decisions made in the Warren court cases affected America back in the day and still affect us till this day.

to investigate the home and its immediate surroundings is a ‘search’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment” (Epstein & Walker 2016). This case justifies my argument that the Warren court left a positive impact on the American people by interpreting and extending the meaning of searches and seizures, and gave a distinct answer of how far a search can go before it violates one’s rights.

The Supreme Court of the United States of America often makes decisions, which change this great nation in a great way. These changes can affect society in many different ways. In many instances there is dissonance over their decisions and the court itself is often split as to how the views are looked upon. The effect of the Courts decision generates discourse and on occasion, violence. This is what happened in the case of Miranda v. Arizona in 1966. This case changed the history of this country and left a tremendous impact, which many challenge, the ruling and still protest today.

Earl Warren, of course, did not see himself as playing a part in undermining law enforcement. Instead, he saw the decisions of his court as ennobling law enforcement (White, 1982). In fact, he was of the opinion that the Supreme Court’s decisions related to criminal justice and police procedures made law enforcement a stronger profession.

The Warren Court led the judicial system in the United States for sixteen years, with 17 justices total, although its most impactful version existed between 1962 and 1969. The court heard and ruled upon 197 cases in total during its tenure, many of which dramatically shaped or created legal precedent. This court is best known for its expansive federal control at what was seen as at the expense of states’ rights and its heavy judicial activism, enhancing the Bill of Rights. Chief Justice Earl Warren, in his control over the court, tried his best to make sure to limit the arguments that the public might have by making sure that the decisions were as close