preview

Warlord Era Research Paper

Better Essays

The Warlord Era (1916-1928) saw the central authority of China deteriorate and the nation brake into several factions, each controlled by intense neighboring warlords. Warlordism was to some degree a zenith of inner divisions that developed in the late Qing Dynasty and further underscored amid Yuan Shikai's administration. Additionally, the Warlord Era can likewise be viewed as a result of long-standing customs in Chinese culture.
Militarism and warlordism are deprecatory terms in Chinese history, usually describing mercilessness, mayhem, and the looting of the civilians. The Warlord Era stayed like this until 1928, when the nation was reunified by the National Revolutionary Army. The Warlord Era was a time of vulnerability, issue, and struggle, …show more content…

Supported by their military power, they kept up virtual regional self-rule over the areas under their control. Their numbers differed enormously, from a modest group of men to furnished army of a few hundred thousand in number. Numerous powerful groups emerged and commanded attention as they battled for national power symbolized in the Beijing government.
The plunge into Warlordism can be traced back to the provincial armed forces the Qing used to vanquish the Taiping Rebellion. Since the national government neglected to independently destroy the Taiping Rebellion, local leaders obtained military experience and power, a foreshadow of China's future separation. Despite the fact that they were not directly related to the local armies that helped the Qing government in vanquishing the Taiping rebels, the later warlord troops were fed by the same political emergency and thirst that had tested the Qing's …show more content…

The framework advanced over time. Traditional China boasted two crucial causes to the Warlord Era: firstly, the undersized role of the military and its all-around reliance on civil officials. A historical heritage dictated relations between military and civil officials. Confucius himself pointed out the chiefdom of the civil above the military. Confucian virtues did not include military exploits; so there is no wonder why Confucians held warriors in neglect and categorized being a soldier as unpopular. As a result, civil authorities constantly imposed strict control over the army. Additionally, with the plight of the western world not yet upon them, China saw little need for a strong centralized military, unless during a time of dynastic transition. Quite expectedly and naturally, civil officials in all state affairs within the framework of this policy had the priority, which in turn led to the growing popularity of the civil service. The civil service examination had long channeled the talented and ambitious to the service of the imperial bureaucracy. The rise of the system of warlords was also caused by the absence of an institutional passage to power. No longer in use, it left one with nothing to follow but one's own ability to survive. Consequently, military power

Get Access