War is a Drug There are some perceived notions when we visualize war: it is tough, stressful on soldiers who risk their lives, and it is also dangerous. Does that mean war can be addicting? Even a drug perhaps? At first glance, the film seems like another action-packed thriller, but it is actually contrast of addiction versus indifference of battle that soldiers deal with on a daily basis. And by using this contrast, can come to the conclusion of my thesis: to show that soldiers, who serve in war, are addicted to it because of love and power.
The film starts fast without giving the viewer time to process what exactly is going on. The team of soldiers are sent to disarm an improvised explosive device, or IED for short, which has been discovered
…show more content…
Very little is revealed about his character, but as Eldridge progresses, we see that he can be led by either Sanborn or James. It is clear he is not a leader, but more so a follow of sorts. The viewer sees the side of post traumatic distress disorder, or PTSD for short, with him. One of the guys he has grown close to, Colonel Cambridge, is blown up by an IED. Eldridge has to witness the horrific event, and death of a close constituent. He is shaken up, and has no idea what do. As I said earlier, we are given the point of view as the invisible fourth team member. We get to witness what Eldridge had to go through, and witness how he has to almost immediately move on and try to cope with the event. In another scene, we see where Eldridge’s PSTD has come into effect. The team is under fire, and all he can think about is this is it. With any one that has PTSD it is hard to refrain from turning the memories back on. Eldridge is seen during the film trying to talk about what happened, as what most people do that have the disease. It turns out, Eldridge is far from addicted to war. He is quite the opposite really. Eldridge was trying to give back to his country, but instead received something less than desirable to have. He now will have to live the rest of his life with PTSD until he learns how to control it. Instead, we move on to the next incident. In the film, Eldridge is simply looking for someone to guide him. …show more content…
James is in the cereal aisle at a grocery store, deciding what kind he wants to eat. He stares at his choices for far longer than any one of us would, but just cannot seem to make up his mind. This is because all James can think about is war. He loves what war does to him. The thrill and adrenalin he gets from it; far exceeds anything normal civilians do on a daily basis. So why exactly is James so addicted to it? Is it simply that soldiers are so accustomed to war as a daily duty, that the repetitive nature of it has led to some of their addiction? Ray Williams from the website Pyschology Today notes, “The use of war and torture by the U.S. has not only become an instrument of political and foreign policy but become increasingly an accepted moral norm, and even glamorized in media and movies.” Ah, so could James simply be addicted to something that has been an accepted moral norm? We see that is has been glamorized in media and movies, maybe James had the same thought with that. Or could the thrill of the unknown possibilities be just that much of an addicting force. The power one may feel flowing through themselves after taking someone else’s life away. Almost as if you are their maker, and have been invested their soul you just took. But James loves to diffuse bombs. Even knowing all of the danger, he keeps going back for more. He knows the next one could be his last one,
The War on Drug began in 1870s, Chinese immigrants were the targets of federal anti-opium laws, and in the early 1920s, and laws targeting cocaine use in the south and marijuana use in the Midwest and Southwest, also directed at people of color, emerged. In 1914, the Harrison Narcotics Act essentially criminalized opiate and cocaine addition, prescribing drugs for those addicted to them, and distrubiting these drugs except for limited medical and scientific purposes p (409). It is to my surprise
non-violent drug charges. These people’s lives are now forever changed because of a mistake they made. This mistake is continually made every single day and Americans are being punished in extreme ways for a non violent crime. The United States needs to decimalize all drugs because the drug war is costly, causes high incarceration rates, and isn’t effective as European drug solutions. In the 20th century, the United States government led a major renewed surge in drug prohibition called the "War on Drugs"
The war on drugs is a long going battle and it has created many issues all around the world and as of today the highest prison population can be found in the United States due to drug charges. About half of the inmates with in federal and state prisons can be found on drug convictions. Those charges can range from possession of an illicit substance to drug trafficking that surprisingly continues to be an issue in federal and state prisons. How can United States put an end to the war on drugs?
The War on Drugs Despite an estimated $1 trillion spent by the United States on the “War on Drugs”, statistics from the US Department of Justice (2010) has confirmed that the usage of drugs has not changed over the past 10 years. Approximately $350 billion is spent per year on the “war on drugs”, only $7 billion is spent on prevention programs by the federal government. The war on drugs is more heavily focused on how to control crime, instead of how to prevent it. Not only is the war on drugs costly
There was so much information on this topic of the War on Drugs that I am still wrapping my mind around it. It went into such detail about the war on drugs that are never talked about. We always hear “just say no.” I know that drugs are a very big problem in our society and even the whole world but I never knew to what extent it really was. I found it very interesting how Johann Hari interviewed these people who were in the middle of the drug war and their stories. It really opened my eyes to what
increased federal spending in an attempt to curb the number of drug users and the sale and importation of illicit narcotics the war on drugs began in earnest. The war on drugs has also played a major role in politics as well as having a significant impact on the economy. While there are many arguments in favor for the war on drugs and an equal number of arguments against it I will attempt to show an unbiased look at the war on drugs and drug prohibition and how it has affected society as a whole. Since
War on Drugs The war on drugs has come a long way without any remarkable success. America has been dealing with the drug menace for many years to a point that four of its presidents have declared the war on drugs part of their main agenda. Sadly, it has been a lost war in various perspectives. Drug abuse continues to be a daily topic with drug abusers flooding not only the American society but also many countries’ hospitals, prisons and courts. The drug trade has continued to cause violent crimes
Studies are in and the war on drugs was a massive failure. This war on drugs was useless because they expected that shunning addicts would diminish drug use. The problem is, the stigmatization of addiction causes much more negative than positive effects in our society. It is harder to get back into society: get a job and is pushing people away from admitting they have a substance abuse problem and seeking treatment. The government made a counter-intuitive system for fighting drugs and it is causing
Whose interests are advanced by sustaining the "war on drugs"? Police seems to gain a lot by sustaining the “war on drug”. Drugs are a significant force in police deviance, with as many as half of all convictions in police corruption cases involving drug-related crimes. Corruption in law enforcement, courts, and corrections can be explained through egoism selfish desires for personal gain. In other cases, however, corruption might be better understood as stemming from socially hedonistic incentives;
PEGGS Project 9/19/2017 The War on Drugs Timeline: 1970 - The U.S. passed laws prohibiting narcotic use under the Controlled Substances Act. 1971 - U.S. President Richard Nixon declares war on drugs and says drug abuse is the country’s biggest threat. 1973 - President Richard Nixon sets up the Drug Enforcement Administration or DEA. 1985 - Drug smuggling shifts into Mexico after U.S. law enforcement cracks down. 2001 - Joaquin “Shorty” Guzman Mexico’s most wanted drug lord escapes from a Mexican
unfortunate events opened his eyes to the constant presence of drugs that surrounded him. He was both a victim and active participant in the world of drugs. The trek was initially to search for the answers to a number of questions that Hari had throughout his experience with drugs that stemmed both from using and observing others do so. These questions included “Why did the drug war start, and why does it continue? Why can some people use drugs without any problems, while others can’t? What really causes
The war on drugs has been talked about since Nixon brought it into play several years ago. It is not surprising that the war on drugs has been rather stagnant over the decades, with little positive outcomes. The war on drugs seems to only fill up the prison with people who in societies eyes have minor or nonviolent offenses. I understand that drugs in the community in a serious problem, however, if this same method hasn’t been working for years then why would it work now. My biggest issue with the
president nixon, Declared Drug abuse public enemy number one, starting an unprecedented global Campaign, the war on drug. Today the number are in the war on drug is a huge failure with devastated unintended consequences, it lead to mass incarceration in the us, to corruption, to political destabilization, and violence in latin america, asia, and africa. To systemic human right abuse across the world.”-Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell The drug war is an all out war between drug cartels, and the governments
president nixon, Declared Drug abuse public enemy number one, starting an unprecedented global Campaign, the war on drug. Today the number are in the war on drug is a huge failure with devastated unintended consequences, it lead to mass incarceration in the us, to corruption, to political destabilization, and violence in latin america, asia, and africa. To systemic human right abuse across the world.”-Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell The drug war is an all out war between drug cartels the usa and mexico
understatement to the punishments given to drug dealers for their drug related offenses. Mandatory minimum drug sentencing was arguably established to target higher level drug dealers but recently the majority of cases have been low level drug dealers. Distributing narcotics is a serious offense, but do these people who are trying to support themselves, a family, or an addiction deserve to spend close to a lifetime incarcerated? During the 1960’s drugs became a symbol of “youthful rebellion, social