preview

Views of Slavery and Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau's Works

Better Essays
Open Document

Views of Slavery and Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau's Works

Two men, similar in their transcendentalist beliefs and yet so different in their methods of expressing their beliefs on handling the issues of society, were major voices in the anti-slavery movement. While their focuses are more on the subjects of morality and individual choice, they still reflect on how slavery should be addressed by the American people, American referring to the free whites who actually make the decisions. Ralph Waldo Emerson is highly regarded for his views on Transcendentalism during what some of deemed the “American Renaissance.” Emerson establishes his place in history by expressing his liberal agenda through his beliefs that truth is …show more content…

In “Last of the Anti-Slavery Lectures,” Emerson’s purpose is not so much to criticize the role of slavery in America as it is to condescend the American people for their lack of individuality. Emerson promotes the principles of self-reliance as he tries to convince the citizens that they were wrong to follow the beliefs of Daniel Webster, a man who prompted the Fugitive Slave law, because this contradicts his view that one should base their beliefs on individual experience instead of knowledge from books and others’ experiences; he asserts that in doing this, people build a stronger sense of conviction, but relying on others demonstrates weakness. Emerson is slightly condescending of the American people because they followed so blindly, and men of all political and economic backgrounds hid under “the shadow of [Webster’s] great name” (1209). He uses a persuasive tone in order to appeal to the citizens’ sense of pride and dignity so they will realize their individualism, and he attempts to sway others to take up his beliefs. In this piece, we must question the irony of the context: Emerson speaks of individual choices, but yet he is trying to make one decision for the majority. Doesn’t this contradict the whole purpose of Emerson’s speech?

In his

Get Access