preview

Vertical Collaboration Vs Vertical Coordination

Better Essays

According to Reframing Organizations the benefits of a formal structure helps a company to not waste time and money especially on training products in an effort to solve problems that deal with social architecture instead of people. Structure, basically a blueprint for internal management/ employees and external constituencies like clients and competitors to follow. It has been said that structural form enhances and constrains what an organization can accomplish. Originations that are successful incorporate a variety of methods to coordinate individual and group efforts and to link local initiatives to worldwide goals. They accomplish this by using both vertical and lateral coordination, they both support growth in the organization. Vertical coordination is more through the chains of command. Higher ups maintain the work of subordinates through authority, policy & procedures, and planning & control. A great example of vertical coordination is farming. Ensuring each stage in the production, processing, and marketing of a product is appropriately managed and interrelated to the next, so that decisions about what to produce, and how much, are communicated as efficiently as possible from the consumer to the producer (Vertical coordination. (n.d.). Retrieved March 12, 2016, from http://www.webref.org/agriculture/v/vertical_coordination.htm). When my family raised soybean we had to keep in …show more content…

Lateral forms are less formal and more flexible than authority systems and rules (Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass). An example of lateral cooperation would be a college football team. Everyone is a player but there a team captions in place for defense and offense. Although lateral is more relaxed members must know who to report to in order for the team to function

Get Access