Vertical Boundaries

Property: The right to claim and hold property; When it has been laboured for, one encloses it for greater individual profit the profit of the community of Man, it has been laboured for – Natural means of ownership one encloses it – The process of holding legal “deed” for greater individual profit – to build investment equity and avoid poverty of waste the profit of the community of Man – Moral commitment to Human Development (Locke: 1689).

Throughout American history, the definition, allocation and protection of property rights has been one of the most controversial and combative issues. According to Armen and Demsetz (1973), “…a private property right includes the right to delegate, rent, or sell any portion of the rights by exchange or gift at whatever price the owner determines (provided someone is willing to pay that price). If person A is not allowed to buy some rights from Person B and Person B therefore is not allowed to

Essentially, humans have the right to own property if they invest their own manual labor in producing it from raw materials. It is important that this right is upheld because it preserves the autonomy people have toward themselves and their property. Even if interfering in this right could produce a more desirable outcome for others, it would be morally wrong because rights are good in themselves, not what they achieve. Therefore, justice in holdings cannot consider welfare, happiness, or equity. It is simply a basic freedom that is inherently valuable and fundamental to uphold a just society.

Whenever we mention the word property in conversation one automatically thinks about physical items such as land, cars and houses. Reed (2014) suggests that, “property is not just an object or thing, nor resource but a right that relates people to each other in regard to limited resources.”

The concept of property has long been one of the most crucial aspects for the U.S. citizens, as it is a major part of the Constitutional, and, therefore, human rights. Although the perception and understanding of “property” have been considerably changed, especially in terms of political and philosophical vision, it still has a particular meaning for the Americans. In general, the idea of property is the question of the political thought and conceptualized thinking common for the United States. In most cases, its transformations are connected to the introduction of capitalism and related governmental decision in politics. Therefore, as any other topic, the value of property has undergone harsh debates. In particular, such important figures as James Fenimore Cooper, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Walt Whitman have developed a fundamental scope of analyses with regard to the property rights in America.

In this paper, I intend to analyze and argue, that we as humans have the right to not only own, but buy, sell, and trade privately owned property. I will also state why I believe that the United States Government should not be an active player in property rights, but an outside regulating source, not interfering or intervening. And I will also go on to say that The United States Government should just protect the people and the people’s property.

The social contract theory or the regulating legal and moral standards in which allows everyone to thrive. The sovereign or the supreme authority creates property rights

According to Locke the word property can be viewed from two perspectives; narrow and broad. Property is broad in the sense that it covers a wide range of human interests and aspirations, while on a narrow perspective property refers to material goods. From his argument property ought to be viewed as a natural right derived from labor. Locke further argues that property should be used to produce goods that are beneficial to human society and that ownership of goods and property should be based on the labor used in producing the goods. Locke believes that nature produces goods of little value; therefore, labor must be exerted to increase the value of the goods. This means that goods the society gets from nature are of less significance unless combined with labor during the production process, so without labor goods are of no value, because goods derive their value from labor. According to Locke, for one to own property they must apply labor in the production of that property, lock summaries the theory by saying that property comes before the state, a claim that Karl Max criticizes in his social theory (Locke 101).

Assessment of the Statement that Property is a Power Relationship Between People Property is the right to possess, enjoy or use a determinant thing, and includes the right of excluding others from doing the same. The concept of ownership or property has no single or widely accepted definition. Like any other concept it has great weight in public discourse and the popular usage varies broadly. Property is frequently conceived as a 'bundle of rights and obligations.' Property is stressed as not a relationship between people and things, but a relationship between people with regard to things.

This is a review of the Transtheoretical Model/Stages of Change Model developed by J. O. Prochaska and C.C. DiClemente to assess an individual’s readiness to change a behavior. In this paper, we will discuss the history of the theory and its constructs. We will also examine a diabetes study and the impact of TTM in conjunction with Social Cognitive and the Theory of Reasoned Action as applied urban African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes. In the application of TTM, what does success look like and how is failure measured?

Agency Problem: “The difficulties that arise when a principal hires an agent and cannot fully monitor the agent’s actions.” (Cornett, Adair, & Nofsinger, 2016, p. 15).

This is the freedom to trade in a particular country versus regulated. For example IKEA a Swedish company is allowed to import its furniture into to the UK without being taxed. IKEA specialises in furniture production and Free trade with the UK

People will engage in a trade, if both parties think that the benefit will outweigh the cost so that is when the trade occurs. If both parties do not believe in that they will not benefit from the trade, then the trade will not occur. A trade does not happen unless both parties think they will win. Trading created wealth in reality, so the benefits outweigh the cost. (pg 20)

It's no question that Jesus played the biggest part in the forming of Christianity. The question is how much of Christianity is based off of his teachings? For starters, there are a lot of his teachings that are not used in modern day. Christianity is built off of a whole lot. Namely the Pharisee tradition of Judaism and all that comes with it (the old testament, the concept of heaven/hell, the resurrection, the devil, etc). Furthermore, Christianity is not based solely off of the teachings of Jesus per say, rather it is based off of the story. Namely the crucifixion and resurrection. As far as how we should live, we get a lot of that from Jesus, Paul, John, Peter, and the early church. Unfortunately, denominations, churches, and theologies tend to give principals and rules rather than equip the average believer to actually walk with and know God. As far as doctrines such as the trinity, and general Christology we get this very much from the early Church. So ultimately you have the Old Testament through the lens of the Pharisee's, the life of Christ, the teachings and histories in the new testament, and then the doctrines found to be truth by the early Christians.

The principals (the shareholders) have to find ways of ensuring that their agents (the managers) act in their interests.