preview

Vaccination Should Be Mandatory

Good Essays

In the past century, vaccinations have progressed to the point where some vaccine-preventable diseases have been eradicated. After the development of vaccines in 1776 by Edward Jenner, vaccines began to help to prevent outbreaks of deadly diseases and control the number of deaths. Ever since the creation of the varicella vaccine in 1995, the number of children who have fallen victim to the disease and died has also decreased. Even people who are unable to be vaccinated have been protected to some extent. There is now a debate of whether or not they should be mandatory for all people who are medically able to receive the vaccinations. Many feel they should not be required by law to vaccinate children and themselves if it violates their beliefs, …show more content…

Some people are unable to be vaccinated for health reasons, but herd immunity can protect them. Herd immunity can be classified as the resistance to the spread of a contagious disease due to a high enough percentage of the population being immune or immunized against the disease (Carroll). A great example of this comes from varicella (chickenpox) vaccine. Unfortunately, the varicella vaccine is not certified to be given to an infant under the age of one, but while the infants cannot be protected by the vaccine directly, young babies can be protected by herd immunity. Since the development of the varicella vaccine, there have been minimal deaths of children from chickenpox because of the protection against it from herd immunity (Carroll). Another example of people that are protected by herd immunity are people who are immune deficient. People whose immune systems are compromised are unable to receive some vaccines. Typically, people who fall under this spectrum include those who are receiving chemotherapy, the elderly, and others who are immunocompromised. Would people knowingly refuse vaccinations if they knew it could kill their grandparents? Or their friends? Or even their newborn baby? It is questionable whether or not people think through all the risks before becoming contentious objectors against vaccinations. People protecting themselves also is able to protect those who cannot protect themselves …show more content…

One argument is vaccines can cause serious side effects (Plotkin). Anaphylaxis and allergic reactions are not extremely uncommon, and a scientist in the 1990s claimed the MMR (Mumps, Measles, Rubella) vaccine is the leading cause of autism in young children (Vaccines Procon.org). While this is true, there have been copious amounts of research done, and everything has shown that there is no correlation between autism and vaccines (MMR and Autism). In reference to other side effects, the chances of them occurring are very low, and often not as extreme as the side effects of the diseases they protect against. A second reason people believe they should be able to choose whether or not to be vaccinated is vaccines can be against some people’s beliefs. Some religious beliefs prevent people from accepting vaccinations, as well as some people who are vegan or do not eat eggs. These people tend to decline vaccines made from such products (Omer). As for the explanation, many vaccines are offered in ways that do not conflict with beliefs, and for patients who have a conflict with eggs, the CDC still strongly recommends receiving vaccines because the vaccines typically only contain trace amounts of the product (Influenza

Get Access