Tallink is a ferry operator based out of Tallinn, Estonia. The company started its business sailing between Tallinn and Helsinki, Finland in the years after Estonia left the USSR to become independent once again. Over its history, Tallink has grown and now has a fleet of eight ferries linking Estonia with other cities in the region including Stockholm and St. Petersburg. The company is considering the purchase of a new ferry with a capacity of 2500 passengers, matching the size of the Romantika, its biggest ferry. Tallink needs to decide if it wants to purchase the ferry and if so, should it use the ferry to launch new service to St. Petersburg to take advantage of the growing Russian tourist market and hopefully relaxed Russian visa rules that are scheduled to start with the 2014 Sochi Olympics.
The spreadsheet shows that the new ship would be best utilized on the Tallinn-Helsinki run, where it replace the capacity of three older ships, the Regina Baltica, the Fantaasia and the Vana-Tallinn. The spreadsheet does not factor in the fixed costs associated with each boat, but it is a reasonable assumption that the fixed costs of the three boats that would be sold are going to be higher than the fixed costs associated with the one new boat. It is recommended, therefore to purchase the new ferry as the solver illustrates that the new ferry would deliver greater contribution margin to Tallink than the three older ferries that it would replace.
Another option for Tallink is
B. 1. The impact of costs on the decision to move forward with the new Maui Sandal line is as follows: As the production continues, the hours needed for each batch, or individual pair, will begin to decrease. By continuing to produce this line the total labor costs will continue to decrease, but most likely, at a slower rate as more sandals are produced. This data can help the company decide employment levels, capacity, costs, and their pricing of this particular merchandise in the open market. The company predicts that it will take 1,000 labor hours for production to complete for the first batch, with 50 total batches between month 1 and month 4.
Ravenport believes that as long as they are not ruining their prices by accepting a lower priced order they should sell excess capacity at any price that is equal to or greater than variable costs. He argues that idle capacity is worse since it has no contribution to overheads whereas a lower price above variable costs would have some positive contribution to the fixed costs and therefore improve profitability for the division. He believes a price of $40 is insufficient to cover the total costs and that the
If Marlene Herbert were to discontinue place mats, he would miss $270,000 that will go toward Mendel paper company fixed cost. The company currently has a plant overhead that is estimated at $420,000 for the quarter. In addition to the fixed plant overhead, the plant incurs fixed selling and administrative expenses per quarter of $118,000. This draws the company to a total fixed cost of $538,000. If Marlene Herbert were to discontinue the second highest contributor to the fixed cost, he would need to increase the volume of computer paper and lower material cost to help pull the contribution margin of the lowest product up to help support the lost of a whole product line.
If the company is incorporated in the U.S., the NPV will be $-7,836,500.07(US25) after 25 years and will be $-6,395,945.22(US30) after 30 years. Therefore, the U.S. company should not purchase the vessel. If the company is established in Hong Kong, the NPV will be $1,522,472.92(25HK) after 25 years and will be $3,402,293.81(30HK) after 30 years. Therefore the 30 years should be the optimal number of years to operate the carrier before scrapping it after 30 years. In this situation, if the 15-year-selling policy is changed, the company should buy the carrier. For years 26-30, we assume that average daily charter rate is increased by $200 per year. The expected daily hire rate is calculated by multiplying Avg. Daily Charter Rate by adjustment factor for hire rate of 65%.
147 (1) Assume that BlueSky purchases three identical aircraft. How many coach seats should BlueSky order for the three new aircraft? (2) Now suppose that the three aircraft can be different sizes, between 240 and 380 coach seats. (a) How do you think the three aircraft should be allocated among the six routes? In other words, should the same aircraft always fly the same routes? Why or why not? (Hint: You do not need an optimization model to answer this question). (b) How many coach seats should BlueSky order for each of the three new aircraft? (3) Because it is cheaper to manufacture three identical planes, Airbus is offering BlueSky a one-time, $5 million discount if it will order three identical aircraft. Should BlueSky take the discount? In deciding this, you may assume that BlueSky operates 3 banks per weekday through Houston, and that the revenues and demands for every bank on every weekday are equal to the demands in Tables 1 and 2 of the (A) Case.
3) Using the budget Data, what was the total expected cost per unit if all manufacturing and shipping overhead (both variable and fixed) were allocate to planned production? What was the actual cost per unit of production and shipping?
Considering that an average ticket price is $1500 and the cost per passenger is $200, each sold ticket generates $1,300 of the positive cash flow. Since $295,000 of the initial capital had been spent by November 14th, the following minimum number of passengers must sign up in order for Health Cruises to break even provided no more money is invested:
I have been asked to produce a report for management of Matteck plc in which I will evaluate the financial viability of the investment proposal. The company is considering expanding into Asia. This operation would involve the acquisition of a factory, a purchase of several new motor vehicles and a new distribution unit. The following are the estimated costs of the planned investment:
Based off a financial analysis using the data Ocean Carriers has provided, the final recommendation is that Ocean Carriers should build a new ship out of its Hong Kong base where the tax rate is 0% and scrap the ship when it is 25 years old. Following this recommendation would be the only scenario where Ocean Carriers sees a positive net present value
1. In question 1, I have assumed its only the Tashtego that makes the trip of Balik to Singapore and back. I have also assumed the relevant cost is the cargo cost only. Therefore, profit contribution of carrying I ton of tapioca from Balik and Singapore:
CubeSmart’s Q1 2017 results came in line with the company’s expectations. The company was pleased with their portfolio performance and the 50 basis point gain in physical occupancy. Revenue for the quarter was $133 million, an increase of $14.2 million, and property operating expenses were $44.9 million, an increase of $4.7 million from the company’s same period results in 2016. Funds from operations was $65.7 million for the first quarter compared with $58.2 million for the first quarter of 2016. Interest expense increased from $12.1 million during the first quarter of 2016 to $13.6 million during he first quarter of 2017. This is due to the higher amount of debt outstanding during the 2017 period to fund a portion of the company’s growth.
In our excel model we tried to determine the no: of units/TEU at which the cost of the Option 2 (Zaragoza) is lower than cost of option 1 (Rotterdam) by varying the number of units/TEU (J 13 cell in excel model) and finding the influx point at which the cost difference becomes positive (E 69 cell in excel model).
Every firm would love to invest in shipping industry due to large profits involved. However this would seem easy but practically it is lot more difficult and virtually impossible to establish in container line business. The problem pertains to large capital investments in form of vessel and container procurements and risk of operating vessels. Even if we take the examples of biggest companies
The following paper analyzes the Whitbread World Sailboat Race case scenario presented at the end of chapter 9 in the Gray and Larson text, Project Management: the Managerial Process. The project encompasses two main objectives; one, design, build and test a new vessel, and two, select and train a crew capable of winning the race. Both objectives must be completed within 45 weeks, the start of the race, and with a planned budget of $3.2 million.
Solely taking a look at the graph, to accommodate future demand for growth I would recommend ocean transportation to move our products from the new facility in China. As we expect demand to grow by 10 percent annually over the next five years, it will be most beneficial to utilize ocean transportation as projected total costs for air becomes higher than ocean above the trade off point of 1,904,761.9 POUNDS. For example, total projected costs were calculated to be at $587,156 for air versus $630,080 for ocean at the end of 5 years. Extrapolate the graph even further into the future, with the expectation of even more growth,