preview

Use Of Moral Codes In The Stranger, By Albert Camus

Good Essays

Suffering at the Helping Hands of Society Stemming from their ancient origins and continuing into the modern day, societal standards and moral codes have greatly influenced the development of cultures, nations, and individuals throughout world history. While some believe that these standards are meant to be broken, others feel that breaking these social codes will result in the downfall of the individual. This is the idea that absurdist and existentialist author Albert Camus depicted in his novel, The Stranger. In his novel, The Stranger, author Albert Camus employs the use of point of view in order to convey the idea that those who fail to conform to social standards and moral codes will ultimately fall victim to their societal ineptitudes. …show more content…

Throughout the novel, Meursault repeatedly denies believing in any sort of religion, a belief that ultimately earns him the nickname “Monsieur Antichrist” (Camus 71). This secularist focus is most keenly emphasized to the reader when the chaplain visits Meursault in his cell prior to his appeal. During this visit, Meursault denies God to the face of the chaplain, who asks “And do you really live with the thought that when you die, you die, and nothing remains?” Meursault replies with, “Yes,” demonstrating that Meursault views religion as a societal triviality (Camus 117). This is because after his conviction, Meursault sees death as an escape from the societal standards and moral codes that led to his condemnation. To Meursault, “death obliterates all of society’s distinctions between innocence and guilt, and a premonition of his death exposes to a man the artificiality of society’s rules” (Lazare). Society, rather, views death as a final form of judgment rather than as an escape from it. In Christianity, for example, one either proceeds into Heaven or Hell after he or she dies, facing judgment for one’s actions in life. Because Meursault’s point of view differs from this …show more content…

As the novel progresses, the reader gathers a clearer and clearer vision of Meursault’s amoral outlook on life. Meursault’s view on the situation with Raymond and his girlfriend is one prime example of this amoral outlook. When Raymond, Meursault’s neighbor, explains to Meursault that his girlfriend has cheated on him and so he consequently beat her, Meursault takes an entirely objective approach to the situation, stating that “he’d beaten her till she bled. He’d never beaten her before…he wanted to know what I thought of the whole thing. I said I didn’t think anything but that it was interesting” (Camus 32). Typically, when one finds out that someone beat his or her significant other, one finds it wrong, immoral, and disgusting. Meursault, however, simply finds it interesting, associating neither positive nor negative connotations with the event itself, demonstrating his amoral take on life. Shortly after this event occurs, Meursault helps Raymond punish the girl, something that led to another beating. Describing the events, Meursault states, “The woman was still shrieking and Raymond was still hitting her. Marie said it was terrible and I didn’t say anything. She

Get Access