preview

Unit 3 Essay Debate Over Taxation And Representation

Decent Essays

Unit 3 Essay Debate Over Taxation and Representation

Following the climactic events of the French Indian War and the Lexington and Concord skirmishes, tensions bubbled between the colonies and the mother country, Britain. This friction stemmed from debate over whether the parliament had the right to legislate over the colonies. Britain felt they should have full jurisdiction over the colonies, while the colonies wanted true representation from within the colonial legislatures. The French and Indian war garnered a large amount of debt and in attempt to repossess some of the money lost, the British Parliament imposed taxes upon colonists. Britain originally implemented the Stamp Act of 1765, but appealed the law after the obstinate reactions of colonists. However, they then issued the Declaratory Act of 1766 which only reiterated the …show more content…

They felt that they had settled into a new country far away from Britain and developed the colonies by themselves. Their political prowess and craving of personal freedoms had flourished alongside the growth of the colonies. One particular angered colonist was James Otis. He compares the treatment of Americans to slavery, as Britain is stripping them of their constitutional rights. In regards to taxation without representation he states the British government is not permitted to make itself capricious by randomly changing its rules to suit its own vendetta. Otis placed an emphasis on Britain not having the right to tax a man without his own consent and that doing so would be unjustly robbing Americans as the free born British subjects they are, of their constitutionally granted rights. Colonist across America supported tis viewpoint and were outraged by the Townshend Acts and Declaratory Acts leading them to defy the prejudiced dictatorship through declining British goods and one of the most infamous acts The Boston Tea Party of

Get Access