Unit 2 Health And Social Care Essay

In the United States there are “over 100 million people receiving some form of federal welfare” (Munoz#7). The purpose of creating the welfare system was to provide aid to those families with “little to no income” (article 1). Back in 1996 Clinton passed the welfare reform act; allowing state full control of the welfare system. The Welfare Reform Act was to help steer welfare

Through interviews with welfare workers and recipients, Hays demonstrates the high costs welfare has had on the moral, economic, physical and mental well-being of poor women and their children due to what she considers to be the conflict between the two opposing aspects of reform: work values and family values. She believes that these conflicting values and the inherent weaknesses in the Act contribute to serious and ongoing problems for welfare recipients.

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act also shifted the spotlight of welfare from family maintenance through government-supported financial assistance to family economic self-sufficiency through paid employment. This federal welfare reform policy known as TANF encourages employment and personal responsibility by mandating states to provide financial benefits to families on a temporary basis, having recipients participate in a work requirement while receiving aid, and providing incentives for recipients to transition off welfare. The programs name indicated its purpose and the social message to the recipient.

The welfare state could be viewed as an assistant to help lower-income to middle-income families. However, even though the welfare state supplies protection against poverty, and other contingencies, it holds society’s construction as a whole in aiding individuals with elements like the in-kind goods and services, which provide health care, food stamps, and education. Until now, lower class citizens in poverty have habitually been a social problem for our conflicted nation for many decades.

Welfare is a federally funded program that began in the early nineteen thirties during the Great Depression. With the sky rocketing demands of families in dire need, The US government created the welfare program to compensate the overwhelming number of families and individuals in need of aid that gave them assistance when they had little to income. The government put together three key program features: mandatory employment services, earnings supplements, and time limits on welfare receipt. Even though the programs were launched prior to passage of the federal welfare reform law of 1996, these three features are essential to most states’ present-day welfare reform programs.

The topic of this paper is to shed light on the issue of welfare. The original purpose and intent for social welfare was to temporarily ease the plight of the poor at no cost to the middle and upper class. Overtime, it has become a burden America’s taxpayers have had to unrightfully carry. Welfare has been reformed in the past, but many still believe it is a failing program. Citizens and non citizens are both taking advantage of the program that was intended to help. Even after multiple reformations, this program continues to fall back into the same issues repeatedly. Taking care of the poor was not intended to be the role of the government. Biblically, that job has been delegated to the church. Social welfare is giving the government more

Throughout the essay, a harsh light was shined on all welfare recipients and these pre-conceived notions represented the author’s focus on his/her own self interest. Hence, a moral relativism standpoint seems to be the underlying ethical principle in the arguments, in particular, the idea of subjectivism where right and wrong is

The welfare system has helped families from around the 1930’s. Social welfare in the United States consists of groups of variety programs. The programs are designed to assist people who are in need of assistance. The goal of the welfare program is to reduce poverty. Poverty undermines the economy by disturbing the normal growth of human capital. Including education, health and professional experience. All the welfare programs require different means of eligibility. There are programs that help with food, housing, Pell Grants, child care, and health care. In this paper I will give a brief review of the most popular programs. I will also tell the requirements to receive benefits. Then I will include a government review of fraud within the

"Welfare 's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence." Ronald Reagan said this statement on January of 1970 when the "Los Angeles Times" interviewed him (Williamson). Federal government funded welfare in the United States started in the 1930s during the Great Depression. Because of the vast numbers of people out of work and with insufficient funds to buy food for their families, President Franklin D. Roosevelt approved a program to give money to state governments for the purpose of making jobs so that unemployed people could work (Bill). This start of federal aid was the beginning of what we know welfare to be today. This paper will show whether or not welfare works in our society, whether or not the U.S. should reform it, and if this nation should even have welfare for those who cannot work.

The basic principles of the Elizabethan Poor Laws of 1601 were “local investigation and administration of relief, work as a component of all assistance, and categorization of the poor into three groups: the able-bodied poor, the impotent poor, and dependent children” (Day & Schiele, 2013, p. 104). Basically, creating a welfare system to help assist the poor, implementing programs to get people working, and categorizing the poor as worthy or unworthy poor. Examples of this in the present social welfare system are TANF, unemployment insurance, Social Security, SSI, and SDI. Within the TANF and unemployment program, there is a job search requirement to encourage people to find work. Also, much like the Elizabethan Poor Laws, people are categorized to receive specific benefits based on whether they can work or not, like SSI, which is for people who are currently unable to work because of old age or disability.

This paper explores five different sources that report information about the U.S.’s welfare programs. The sources discuss when welfare first came about as well as the changes that have occurred over the years. This paper will inform, analyze, and state my opinion on the affect of welfare in the United States. I will discuss the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, the Welfare-to-Work initiative, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). This paper will state my opinion of the welfare changes made in Congress in 1996, after giving you details of what was changed in the welfare programs.

Social welfare policy that is seen throughout America today has roots that are hundreds of years old. The modern policy in America has been based on five fundamental traditions that were brought from Britain when they colonized North America. Those five traditions are Calvinism, Localism, controlling the mobility of the workforce, reliance on poor houses and work houses, and less eligibility. These traditions will be defined and then connected to the influence they have had on the modern American social policy.

Welfare happens to be a broad term that can characterize various different matters. Children, elderly individuals, and those that have little to no income are aimed to be assisted by government programs, also described as welfare. Programs such as SNAP, SSI, and Medicaid have been around for several decades. Such assistance has kept several families and individual’s out of poverty. Without these programs many children, elderly individuals, and those who are disabled would not obtain proper nutrition and medical attention.

Welfare policy in the U.S. has always been connected with work ethic. Nineteenth century laws for the poor established a moral distinction between the “deserving” and “undeserving” poor. Those who fell under the deserving category were often out of work through no fault of their own, and they qualified for support from their fellow man. But the idle, immoral poor were snubbed, their children taken and put in homes or with capable families (Hayes 12). Welfare can be used as a glue to help keep families together as they better their situation, and indeed it had been used for that until the 1996 reform that created time limits and sent the message, better

    In order to help the impoverished, we need to revise the welfare system.  As it stands, welfare promotes apathy among the individuals that take advantage of it. As is stated in an article by Robert Rector and Jennifer Marshall, the goal of the welfare system has never been to