Uncle Basil In You Cant Take It With You

How can a main character help an audience see another person’s perspective? The main character in The Contender by Robert Lipsyte, Alfred Brooks, gets beat up for something he didn't do. And lost things along the way like trust and a friend, but thought out the story he gained them back with also so much more. Is this essay i will compare and contrast me and Alfred, using three traits from the story, being responsible, compared to others, and being fearless.

b. Identify and explore one or more key conflicts for the protagonist and the consequences that arise from these problems. Provide significant quotations (properly cited) that clearly support your ideas.

The main character Henry was created with the following elements: mental characteristics, choice of words, and descriptions of actions or decisions. The author made use of mental characteristics to create the character of Henry by allowing the reader to better understand the character of Henry. In other words, the usage of mental characteristics helps the reader better understand what Henry is thinking. “From the stories, the youth imagined the red, live bones sticking out through slits in the faded

On page 64 Uncle Farrell and Alfred go to the building because Uncle Farrell is trying to get $500,000 from Mogart while he is pretending to be Mr. Myers. Mogart plays a trick on them and on page 69 and it tells you why Uncle Farrell dies and Mogart takes the sword for himself. Uncle Farrell says “You’ve got the sword, Mr.Myers. Can we have the money now”. Uncle Farrell is caring because he takes care of Alfred when his Mother died. He also needs the money because he is poor and Alfred and Uncle Farrell are the only family members that they know of. For example Uncle Farrell wants to steal the sword for half of a million dollars. He is really greedy because he only wants money because he is poor and he is stubborn when Alfred says that he doesn't want to play football. On page 31 Uncle Farrell says “You can trust us. You can consider your fancy sword as good as returned”. Mogart relates to this character because they are both greedy for something. Uncle Farrell is greedy for

Characterization is effectively used to create character plot and portray the theme of the story. This is effectively used by the author through Millicent’s thoughts and through the use of other characters. For instance, Millicent continually tells herself that “what girl wouldn’t” want to be elected like she was (Plath 240). She repeatedly tells herself ideas such as this, because she is trying to convince herself that she is making the right choice. Another instance is shown when Tracy tells Millicent that Millicent will “change, whether she thinks” she will or not (240). Through the words Tracy states, Millicent realizes that she is lying to herself. Consequently, through the earlier examples, the characterization of Millicent and other characters creates the character plot in the story. The character plot in the story shows how Millicent has to make a

3. The name of the central character, together with a description of the character 's

These trait were often told to us by the author, through how laurie speaks and his actions. Some of these, such as how

Characterization is a literary element used by the author to present qualities of characters in a literary piece, the purpose of characterization is to make characters credible and make them suitable for the role they play in the work. Authors present various characters possessing dissimilar qualities, to emphasize different aspects of the work. In the novel “The Scarlet Letter”, the author Nathaneil Hawthorn’s depiction of the two male characters, Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth, emphasizes the moral problems of the seventeenth century puritan society. Hence, their different characters contribute vitally to the plot of the novel.

“Character, like a photograph, develops in darkness.” Yusuf Karsh wittily elucidates that character takes time to mature into one of great influence. To achieve this, writers introduce several different literary techniques. Generally, to build a character, writers use direct and indirect presentation. While using direct presentation, the author candidly gives readers information through narration. Indirect presentation occurs when readers receive information about a character from dialogue or an action made by another character. By utilizing these methods, writers can effectively create their characters in a way that successfully collaborate to an intricate plot. Nathaniel Hawthorne uses these techniques to unravel many

There are three aspects of characterization that will show the reader how Jim changes from a passive to an aggressive character. This is shown by Jim's actions, appearance and by what other people think of him.

Great authors use characterization to further develop a character. In Arthur Miller’s play, “Death of a Salesman”, an old salesman named Willy pressures his eldest son, Biff, to become a successful businessman. Through the different father-son relationships, Willy’s character develops. In the play, Arthur Miller portrays father-son relationships as detrimental to one’s success by characterizing Willy as desperate, demanding, and difficult.

Courage is expressed by characterisation, dialogue and plot. Showing or explaining the different personality traits of each character highlights the acts of courage through characterisation. Characterisation is the main technique that can be compared and contrasted between To Kill a Mockingbird and The Help. Although every character is different, some of their beliefs, opinions and actions are similar, which assists in creating a greater understanding of courageous, or cowardly approaches shown in each character.

“Character” (Experiences and attitudes that form decisions/actions): Brack is a rich man, and he is in a sense same approach similar as Hedda. He informs her about Eilert Lovborg how he is competing with George in the same position

“...his indifference was probably merely a mood that would pass away. There was so much in him that was good, so much in him that was noble.” (Wilde 97) This happens directly after Dorian sheds light onto his views of the rumors surrounding Sibyl’s death. Basil knows that Dorian is being ignorant and heartless in the way he treats the situation, but Basil is so blind and bold, that he is going to still defend Dorian. He isn't defending Dorian publicly either, he does so to himself because he takes responsibility for Dorian. Basil feels that if Dorian truly becomes corrupted, it will be his fault, and he could never accept that, or the shame it carries. He would rather think of Dorian’s behavior as

Your third step is to start hunting for clues – supporting details, vocabulary, character's actions, descriptions, dialogue, and more – to prove one of the inferences listed below the question. Take this question, for example: