preview

Unburned Vegetation Survey

Good Essays

Results The percent coverage of the four types of vegetation was calculated using the data that we gathered in this experiment. The values for the f-tests and t-tests were also calculated in this experiment for the four different types of vegetation as well as for the DBH of species in burned and unburned sites. The percent coverage of woody vegetation in burned sites: 27.8125% ± 29.83%, is higher than that the percent coverage of woody vegetation in unburned sites: 15.25% ± 14.69% (Figure 1). Grasses in burned areas also have higher percent coverage than the percent coverage of grasses in unburned areas: 36.75% ± 30.01% for grasses compared to 5.125% ± 6.49% in the grasses (Figure 1). The percent coverage of annuals & perennials in burned …show more content…

The F-test values in canopies (0.031271512) and sub-canopies (0.005008424) are both below 0.05 so we can say with 92% confidence that the canopy structures in burned and unburned areas differ and with 97% confidence that the sub-canopies vary between the burned and unburned areas. Unburned areas tended to have better developed structures of canopy and sub-canopy trees because they were given more time to accumulate compared to recently burned areas which have recently undergone a disturbance. The F-test value for DBH (0.022472008) is also below 0.05 so we also have to assume that there is variance in terms of DBH in burned and unburned sites. Unburned sites have larger trees (larger DBH) because these trees had more time to grow compared to trees in recently burned sites. Since the F-tests values for the logs (0.076083352) and shrubs (0.340469754) were calculated to be above 0.05, we are not able to draw definitive conclusions on this data, therefore we have to assume that the logs and shrub structures did not vary within the burned and unburned sites (Klowden et al. 2015). Succession is evident in this experiment as there is an overall greater percent coverage of grasses, woody plants, and annuals & perennials in burned areas compared to open space. Open space is greatest in unburned areas and there is more open space in unburned areas than burned areas; this is mainly because the woody plants in unburned areas store lots of nutrients within themselves, therefore having less grasses and smaller plants on forest floors (Dickman et al 2014). Five different species of canopy trees were identified in unburned sites compared to only three species of canopy trees identified in burned sites which allows me to conclude that there is more diversity in the species of canopy trees in unburned areas than burned areas. There may have been more types of species found in unburned

Get Access