Unbiased In Sociology

A critical analysis of the movie The Blind Side provides examples of the sport topics Race and Ethnicity, community in sport, and sport in parent-child interactions, and the human communication concept of interpersonal. Race and ethnicity in the world of sport varies, an ethnic group or ethnicity is a population group whose members identify with each other on the basis of common nationality or shared cultural traditions. The term race refers to the concept of dividing people into populations or groups on the basis of various sets of physical characteristics which usually results from genetic ancestry. An example of race is brown, white, or black skin all from various parts of the world, while an example of ethnicity is German or Spanish ancestry

Foremost, it is important to understand the term ‘sociological imagination’. The sociological imagination was a term first introduced by sociologist C.Wright Mills in his 1959 book; “The sociological imagination”. Mills introduces the sociological imagination by initially drawing a distinction between ‘Milieu’ and structure. Mills illustrates milieu as the visible, accessible and ‘emotionally coloured’ world an individual resides within, they are habitants of this ‘world’ only as their vision of the world is limited via the personal immediacy of the community they participate in. He defined this imagination as “…the vivid awareness of the relationship between experience and the wider society” (Mills, 1959).

If Sociology is the systematic study of human society, then sociological imagination is what we perceive or think about how people work and or think in a more personal and bias matter. C.W. Mills believes that merging two different theories of social reality of the “individual” and “society”. Mills challenges readers and learners by arguing many basic terms and definitions from what “we” believe are right. Chapters one and two talks about how society portrays what we know rather then the facts. Our bias opinions and beliefs often go against what science has proven.

According to C. Wright Mills (1959), sociological imagination is the ability to appreciate a different (wider) perspective of the self in relation to others and to society than the narrow perspective of the self that comes most naturally to the individual. Today, sociological imagination is a concept that is considered central to the study of sociology and other disciplines such as social psychology because the ability to shift from a personal perspective to a more objective perspective is crucial to understanding other people and to understanding the norms, values, and expectations of other societies that may differ substantially from the society of the researcher or student.

Sociological imagination is the study of society on a micro or macro scale. The term was first used by an American sociologist C. wright mills (1916-1962). This unique quality of thinking allows a person or a group to think or feel about society in general around us or in relation to a larger group to emphasize the connection between personal and structural (group) issues or trends. In other words, a sociologist tries to understand why things are the way they are.

Sociological imagination is the way in which individuals realize the connection between their own experience of reality and the experiences of society as a whole. This realization allows people to make sense of the world around them. When one applies sociological imagination, they are stripping their own personal experiences from their thoughts to analyze the social world around them. It allows one to understand different perspectives of the world without the narrow lens of personal experience and bias. This is extremely important in modern society. For instance, in politics, it is very important to hold back personal beliefs when it comes to law-making. A politician who refrains from applying her own moral beliefs to her political agenda in attempt to create a better society is practicing the use of sociological imagination. She removes her own personal views of the world in order to see society’s views as a whole, and acts accordingly. In other words, sociological imagination is “taking the role of the other” to gain a wider understanding of a perspective other than one’s own.

A key part of engaging in sociology is to adopt a sociological viewpoint or 'think sociologically'. Etymologically, sociology is the 'study of society' but this doesn't differentiate sociology from other forms of social study. Hence, many begin to describe thinking sociologically by what it is not - it is not thinking politically, thinking anthropologically, thinking historically or thinking psychologically, for example (Berger 1966: 11-36; Reiss 1968: 2-3). Others try to determine the nature of sociological thinking by detailing practical phenomena which can be thought about such as social systems and their subsystems, social institutions and social structure, and social aggregates, relationships, groups and organisations (Reiss 1968: 1),

Sociological imagination is merely the connection between a person and the society. Every person is connected to and influenced by society to a different extent. Some people are completely absorbed in society and feel obligated to keep up with the trends, or else they feel like an outlier. On the other hand, some people do not keep up with the trends of society because they could care less about others opinions. Sociological imagination can be used to show the relationship between both those types of people and the society, and it can be used to explain how people view society from their point of view. When people look at societies from an outsider’s point of view, “rather than only from the perspective of personal experiences and cultural biases” (Schaefer 4), they are able to notice the things that shape and mold their character. The outsider perspective also provides them with a better understanding of themselves by understanding the relationship between them and society.

The term “Sociological Imagination” can be defined in various contexts and in different ways depending on the situation and surroundings. According to most researchers, the definition of the term varies from case to case. Due to different scenarios and observations, most researchers have failed to apply a single definition of the term. However, after studying a number of cases, there is a general definition that we can associate to this term, i.e. the interaction of one’s mind and its experiences.

Sociological imagination is a concept that was defined in 1959 by American sociologist C. Wright Mills. He described it as an awareness of the relationship between a person’s behavior and experience and the wider culture that shaped the person’s choice and perceptions. It helps us relate our own experiences to others. Sociological imagination can help us understand the difference between personal troubles and public issues by determining if it is a problem in someone’s own history or if it is an issue in the society or culture’s history.

The sociological imagination is the “quality of mind” (Mills, 1959: 4) that enables individuals to look outside their private sphere of consciousness and identify the structures and institutions in society that influence or cause their personal experiences. In this way, by looking at the bigger picture, they can understand their place in society and explain their circumstance in terms of societal influence.

According to The Promise of Sociology by C. Wright Mills, “sociological imagination is a special way to engage the world and to think sociologically is to realize that we experience as personal problems are often widely share by others like ourselves” (p.1). What C. Wright Mills is trying to get across about the meaning of sociological imagination is that a person is somewhat connected to each other because of what they are both experiencing. An example of this is when there is an event that a lot of people, their families are all experiencing the same feeling, which is grief for the loss of loved ones but there are not connected to each other. This is what C. Wright Mills means about sociological imagination that even though two people are not related to each other, they can both experience the same feelings or problems. Also, as time and days go by, a person can experience confusion or positive and negative events in his or her life that can affect that person’s mood or emotions. These feelings will aid the person to improve and know his or her purpose in society. In addition, as the person will endure and experience all of these emotions and feelings, the person will undoubtedly encounter other people who share the same feelings, values, and emotions that he or she is experiencing and may come to realize that each individual is interconnected in some way, either by experience or emotions.

The Sociological Imagination is a form of critical thinking that was developed by C. Wright Mills to allow people to see the society around them through the eyes of the Impersonal and Larger societal world around them without bias in any form from the larger societal world, in order to improve their society where need be for the good. [7]

The sociological imagination is an idea or a way of thinking that interlocks an individual in a society with the society as a whole. Most people refer to sociology as the study of how people or individuals interact with each other. In order to fully understand sociology and the concept of the sociological imagination as proposed by C. Wright Mills, one has to be able to envision the individual and the society working together to better understand the role each plays in the social order. C. Wright Mills states that "Sociology must make a connection between the individual and the social. It must allow the individual to see the larger context in which his or her life is lived, and in

The sociological imagination, as coined by C. Wright Mills, is defined by the Introduction to Sociology as “the application of imaginative thought to the asking and answering of sociological questions.” In simple terms, it can be described as the ability to grasp the relationship between our lives as individuals and larger social forces that help to shape us. An example of this is the difference between personal troubles and public issues. Imagine the issue of unemployment in a small town; personal troubles means that five out of the population of 10,000 people of this town are unemployed. This is a personal trouble because in this situation, only 0.05% of the population are unemployed. Unemployment in this town would be a public issue if ten