Two Sector Specific Plans: Interdependence "Traditionally, a successful terrorist campaign required an audience 'terrorism is theatre,' as Brian Jenkins has suggested. Yet, the attacks in Bali, London, Madrid and New York suggest that the newest wave of terrorist groups also want people dead, not just watching" (Forest, 2006). When it comes to issues of homeland security and national security, one commonly thinks of the banking and finance institutions, communications, the safety of the water supply, energy, food and agriculture, and comparable issues. However, the nation has a truly wide range of vulnerabilities that exceed even those issues. For instance, two areas of vulnerability are educational institutions and national monuments/icons. It's not a surprise that these sector specific plans have a certain level of interdependence, given the overlap that these two arenas have in nature. A national monument or icon is a physical structure or object that represents the country's traditions, values, history and has a purpose of memorializing notable aspects of the nation's heritage or values and which also represents a point of interest for visitors (dhs.gov, 2010). Educational facilities have an extreme essence that is comparable to national monuments: they're places of history and promise. Institutions like Harvard and the University of Chicago were founded by some of the nation's brightest and most influential historical figures and are destinations in their own
September 11th catalyzed a major revival in the American public’s concern for domestic national security, which had dropped off following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The attacks, which were the first on American soil since Pearl Harbor, prompted American leaders to respond with swift and ambitious military action. At this time, the public perceived security of American territory against “terrorism”–an intentionally broad and emotionally charged term– as its chief national interest. Following the attack, President Bush announced the launch of a “global war on terror”, an international effort to combat terrorist groups and the nations that harbor them–prompting him to establish the Department of Homeland Security later that year.
Planning ties with one of the National Preparedness Goal’s mission area, that is prevention. The 9/11 events made DHS to aggressively change its focus to an “all hazards” approach. Prevention is a core component to accomplish this objective. However, for an effective prevention requires thorough planning. The private sector provides this type of service and DHS may hire a private sector entity to develop a prevention plan for them. In planning, all levels of government and private sector entities must coordinate with one another in developing and executing courses of action to prevent or reduce the impact of natural disasters or terrorist attack (Homeland Security, 2011). According to the National Preparedness Goal, planning is one of the mission are capabilities and preliminary targets of prevention (Homeland Security, 2011, p. 5). The private sector’s impact in planning with the DHS is essential for an effective prevention in support of the National Preparedness
At the point when 9/11 happened, I was an eighth grader in South Florida, and an amazingly naive nationalist. I observed with sickening apprehension as the second tower fell live on the TV in my show class. I needed activity! How set out the "scalawags" do such a marvel to my kindred Americans!
Every year there is an increased rate of PTSD in veterans and is negatively affecting society in the U.S. today. In addition, security such as the TSA, NSA, and Homeland Security is engrained in the lives of U.S. citizens and immigrants. “The effects of the tragedy on travel and tourism continue to be felt today, however, in the form of higher travel costs, vastly stricter security and safety checks and procedures and the creation of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)” (Burger). This demonstrates that society today has become more secure and willing to give up some privacy for safety. Another issue is the paranoia of terrorists in the United States.
The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2011 prompted the world to reevaluate and drastically modify airport and airline security. “Four targets had been chosen, all iconic American buildings that would send a clear message of the depth of their hatred for the United States. All four planes crashed, killing all on board—terrorists, crew members, and passengers, along with hundreds who were killed inside the structures, on the ground, and the men and women who ran into collapsing buildings in an effort to try and save others” (Smutz 1). As Jason Villemez said “the decade after the 9/11 attacks reshaped many facets of life in America” (Villemez 1). Before the attacks, people did not think that large
On September 11, 2001, an Islamic terrorist group, known as Al-Queda, hijacked four American airplanes and attempted to crash them into important United States landmarks, such as the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Unfortunately, the hijackers succeeded at The Pentagon and World Trade Center. Nearly three thousand people lost their lives because of these attacks. Sixteen years later, people still remember it as one of the most tragic events in US history. On this day, the most massive terrorist attack to ever happen on American soil occurred, yet the after effects of 9/11 are even larger; because of 9/11, the United States has developed safer air travel and immigration policies, but unfortunately, innocent Islamic people suffered and are still suffering from hate crimes.
One way the bombing increased the study of terrorism in the U.S. is stated by Steve Bucci, of the Heritage Institute. The Heritage Organization is the nation’s largest, most broadly-supported conservative research and educational institution. The commentator of the article, 60 Terrorist Plots Since 9/11: Continued Lessons In Domestic Counterterrorism, Steven Bucci states; “The third most common target was mass gatherings, like the Boston Marathon, nightclubs and bars, and shopping malls” (Bucci). According to Bucci, mass gatherings have been a target for numerous years and the Boston Marathon Bombing could have happened anywhere, from a mall, to another marathon. The Boston Marathon Bombing brought the issue of terrorism in the U.S. back into international spotlight.
On September 11, 2001, there were 2,996 casualties and more than 6,000 others were injured in the terroristic attacks of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Some may say that these acts of terrorism changed the American homeland security for the better, others disagree. Since the events of September 11, 2001, the Department of Homeland Security was created and expanded into one of the largest divisions of the federal government. This paper consists of the lack of homeland security before September 11, 2001, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, and the development of this department, which is leading America to be safer since the last act of terrorism.
We need to pay close attention to what terrorists are planning ahead of the closing of the New York's Laboratory and how terrorists are going to take advantage or benefit of this. We need to ask ourselves if the negative consequences or effects are going to be worth the close of the New York’s Laboratory. As a result, New York City has to be prepared for terrorists attacks and other attacks coming there way because of the closing of the laboratory. In addition investigators say these “attacks [occur] on a densely populated area [that] the potential for mass casualties”(Guardian). “In fact New York City is one of the most populous cities in the United States with a population of 8,537,673 people as of July 2016”(Current). This causes an illustration of how “critical infrastructure attack[s] affects security, [also] contributes economic loss[es], and presents public health and safety issues [like fear]”(Guardian). The population of New York City can be a reason of why it's a top targeted area for terrorists attacks to occur. If they can get the people to see these terrorists attacks they have accomplished their primary goal to create fear to the people. Terrorists threats that are made to the United States are persistently rising because they want are nation to lack confidence. The most common “targets for terrorists are government assets, critical infrastructure and densely populated areas” because
On September 11, 2001, terrorists initiated multiple attacks on America that took the lives of nearly three thousand innocent people. It was a day of destruction and horror that will be branded in the minds of many for a long time. The tragedies on 9/11 could have been avoided if airport security in the United States had been stricter. A strong foundation for Homeland Security is essential in protecting America from further attacks. In the essay
Once the stuff of movies or perhaps newscasts covering a conflict in some third world backwater country, large scale terrorist operations are now a deadly reality in America. Few will ever forget the images of the Afred P. Murrah Federal Building: its remaining floors held up in a precarious cantilever; bloody, dust-covered survivors struggling to escape through the smoke and flames. These images will be repeated over and over again as our nation moves into the
September 11 of 2011, reveals to United States and the world the new scale of massive destruction and violence inflicted by state sponsored terrorism groups whose distorted religious beliefs achieved nothing to resolve their political and social problems but take out of the shadows serious issues regarding our public safety and become a latent threat awaiting any opportunity to commit one more atrocity against any large vulnerable civil target (Clarke and Newman, 2007, p. 199). Nevertheless, even when it’s clear that terrorist groups are quite distant from deterrence in the United States, and the rest of the world shouldn’t let themselves be intimidated or be submitted by any stance to its demands. However, a prompt infrastructure reconstruction
“We have learned as a Nation that we must maintain a constant, capable, and vigilant posture to protect ourselves against new threats and evolving hazards. But we have also learned that vigilance and protection are not ends in and of themselves, but rather necessary tools in the service of our national purpose.”(Napolitano, 2010, p.iv) In the wake of the September 11th, 2001 attacks our nation has taken upon itself extreme vigilance to ensure the security and defense of the American people. The relationship between homeland security and homeland defense is one that is tightly knit. Each has a very distinct mission set but somewhere along the spectrum they cross over and mutually support each other in the best interest of the nation.
Acts of terrorism has greatly affected multiple countries, including the United States. The horrific events that took place on 9/11 left the American people shocked, devastated, and furious. Many innocent American’s lost their lives on this infamous day. While airports and airlines are not free from security breaches, a set of new security measures and requirements have been implemented by the International Air Transport Association and the International Civil Aviation Organization (Beirman, 2011). Increased security at airports and airlines, have left terrorists to target more vulnerable areas such as tourist destinations. Attacking tourists’ spots such as hotels, restaurants, nightclubs, conference venues and other forms
The distinction between homeland security and homeland defense is pivotal in gaining a better understanding of how these agencies work and how they correlate to our nations infrastructure. We must understand the designated missions set forth for both these agencies while learning how they meet the tasks appointed to them and resources utilized to accomplish the mission. Learning the fundamentals of our nations infrastructure information must be provided to showcase how these agencies utilize the appropriate resources to guarantee the security of these critical infrastructures. Offering an opinion in the definition of homeland security and how resources are being utilized to fix vulnerabilities is vital to showcase what is being distributed and learned on a researchers and readers level. Homeland security and homeland defense play a pivotal role in ensuring our borders are protected.