Total asset turnover
=sales/(total asset) 0.41 times 0.42 times 0.38 times
Fixed asset turnover
=sales/(fixed asset ) 0.55 times 0.54 times 0.46 times
Time series
Total asset turnover
Total asset turnover is a ratio that narrates the amount of sales generated for every unit of the asset. In 2012 , an asset turnover ratio for Axiata is 0.41 means Axiata can produce $0.41 for every $1 worth of assets. In general, the higher the ratio means the company is more effective at using its assets. But whether a particular ratio is good or bad differs on the industry in which your company works. Furthermore,some industries are simply more asset-intensive than others ,so their total turnover ratios will be lower.
In 2014 Axiata analyzes that its asset turnover ratio is 0.38 which has declined from 0.42 in the year 2013. Companies with a decreasing asset turnover ratio must analyze their
…show more content…
Generally, a high fixed-asset turnover ratio is better for small business indicates that Axiata generate strong sales for the level of fixed assets their use in 2012, but it can have some negative implications in some situation.
In year 2012 Axiata with fixed asset ratio 0.55 which has the highest ratio compare with the following year. With the highest ratio in the year 2012, Axiata is doing an effective job of generating sales with a relatively small amount of fixed assets and selling off excess fixed asset capacity. After 2012, decline in the ratio can indicate Axiata over interested in fixed asset such as equipment or machine. The possible cause to help increase lower ratio such as provide new products or services that require more than traditional. The concept of the fixed asset turnover ratio is more valuable to an outside participant, who wants to know how well a Axiata is employing its assets to generate
* Return on assets (ROA) – ROA shows how successful a company is in generating profits on the amount of assets they own. Since assets consist of debt and equity, ROA is a measure of how well a company converts investment dollars into profit. The higher the percentage, the more profit a company is generating per dollar of investment. Similar to ROS, this ratio needs to be looked at compared to the industry as different industries have different requirements that can affect ROA. For example, companies in the airline and mining industries need expensive assets to operate so will have lower ROA’s compared to companies in the pharmaceutical or advertising industries.
Return on Assets shows the Company’s ability to generate a profit based on assets and equity. In 2009, the Company’s profit margin was 3.07% and in 2011 it had fallen to 1.91%.
Asset turnover depicts investment efficiency, because it shows how many sales dollars are generated for every dollar invested in the company’s assets. Lowe’s had relatively lower asset turnover ratios than Home Depot because their recent investment in PP&E.
The fixed-asset turnover: This ratio measures a company's ability to generate net sales from fixed-asset investments
Asset turnover (T/O) demonstrates how effective the asset base is in generating top line revenue. High T/O values have implications in terms of plant structure, level of backward integration, and aggressiveness of pricing policy. CUMULATIVE PROFITS Formula Cumulative Profits is the total Description of all year 's Net Profit. :
Return on assets ratio declined in 2010. This is due to increased total assets in 2010 due to company's acquisition of assets. In 2011, the company had a higher return on equity, which indicates that Lowe’s was able to generate more profit from the money that shareholder invested. The sales generated relative to total assets decreased in 2010, mainly due to reduced sales in 2009 coupled with increased total assets. Fixed asset turnover has been relatively good for Lowes. The ratio indicates how well the company is able to put fixed assets to use in generating sales. Current ratio has improved over past three years indicating a strong trend for the company in its ability to pay its current liabilities with current assets. The long-term debt forms a major part of company's financing. The company reviews its
The Total Asset Turnover or ROA (Return on Asset) lets us know how effectively assets generate revenue. Accounts Receivable Turnover tells us how effectively a company is collecting money from sales. As we can see, both companies are doing pretty comparable and so far, this does not explain the sudden cliff on Profit Margin.
Also, according to its leverage ratios, the company’s debts are not only very high, but are also increasing. Its decreasing TIE ratio indicates that its capability to pay interests is decreasing. The company’s efficiency ratios indicate that despite the fact that its fixed assets are increasingly being utilized to generate sales during the years 1990-1991 as indicated by its increasing fixed asset turnover ratio, the decreasing total assets turnover indicate that overall the company’s total assets are not efficiently being put to use. Thus, as a whole its asset management is becoming less efficient. Last but not the least, based on its profitability ratios, the company’s ability to make profit is decreasing.
Based on Next Annual Report and Account January (2011), the chief executive's review present the A New Normal of company overview, due to the changing consumer environment, Next PLC need to have New avenues of growth, and brand new way to control cost, also, it will be important that retailer have to generate the healthy cash flow with cautious management. Furthermore, enable to know how company efficiently use asset to generate revenue and whether there was improvement between 2010 and 2011, the activity ratios have to calculate out. The ROCE in 2010 and 2011 were 38.91%,41.79%, this number showed how profit generated by capital employed, and the growth figure of ROCE lead to level up efficiency asset used.((NEXT PLC, 2011 page43, 45) The figure for inventory turnover, receivable turnover, and payable turnover in 2010 and 2011 were 46.81 days, 54.98 days; 66.07days, 68.23 days; 83.36days,81.3days; respectively. (ibid) It is clearly show that the inventory and receivable turnover in 2010 was taken lesser day than 2011, in which means inventories took less day to sold out to costumer and the cash credit receive more faster than the 2011, besides, the payable turnover had longer period than 2011, it was also a good example to illustrate that there was more cash flow holding by company, and the overall image of these figure present that the resource had been
Abbott’s fixed asset and total asset turnover ratios can tell us how well the firm uses its assets to generate revenue. The fixed asset ratio provides the proportion of sales to fixed assets and tells us how much revenue is
A third activity ratio is the inventory turnover ratio, which indicates the effectiveness with which the company is employing inventory. Since inventory is recorded on the balance sheet at cost (not at its sales value), it is advisable to use cost of goods sold as the measure of activity. The inventory turnover figure is calculated by dividing cost of goods sold by inventory:
Asset turnover ratio is also increasing in 1994. It shows that total assets are being efficiently used in producing revenues.
Evaluating management effectiveness, the asset utilization ratios assess daily operating performance. Indicating a quicker collection turnover on outstanding debt, Google has a higher receivables turnover than Apple. Although, Google takes longer to collect accounts receivable, or average collection period, than Apple. Similarly, analysis reveals Google has double the higher inventory turnover than Apple. Comparing the fixed asset turnover reveals that Google gains 2.64 dollars for each dollar in fixed assets, whereas Apple generates 7.98 dollars. The total asset turnover tells that Apple outperformed Google by generating 67 cents for every dollar of assets.
This type of business seems to be sole proprietor and the financial structure of this firm has maximum number of inventories and zero level of debt financing. Most of the drug retailers usually have a large amount of inventories due to any emergency situation and demand for the medicines is usually high. In this case the high asset turnover shows that the firm is effectively doing business by selling off its assets which in this case is medicines to generate more and more cash.
Inventory turnover for Company A (3.08x) is higher than Company B (0.93x), that means inventories are sold and replaced faster than Company B. Company A has higher turnover because those institutions, especially hospitals “consume” health products faster and more. Lastly its show Company A has deep pipeline of its ethical pharmaceuticals.