preview

Tuna Dolphin Case

Good Essays

Jonathan Wert
5/2/17
Environmental Politics
Dr. Carroll

Tuna-Dolphin Case 1991

The Tuna-Dolphin case between Mexico and the United States started in 1991 when Mexican fishing fleets were killing an excessive amount of dolphins by U.S. standards. The United States imposed trade embargo on the tuna imported from Mexico. Mexico filed the complaint with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or GATT. The embargo came from the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. The problem arose because schools of yellow fin tuna swim under schools of dolphin; therefore, many dolphins are caught with purse-seine nets and die unless released. This case study investigates the past proceedings of the issue, analyses the disputes ruling, and the implications of the decision made. The Marine Mammal Protection Act put dolphins under protection standards for the domestic American fishing fleet and for countries whose fishing boats catch yellow fin tuna. It states explicitly, “if a country exporting Tuna to the United States cannot prove to United States authorities that it meets the dolphin protection standards set out in U.S law, the U.S government must embargo all imports of the fish from that …show more content…

GATT’s decision means no country can embargo another countries goods because of different environmental regulations. In 2017, I do not see a purpose for the U.S to be in GATT without environmental standards. I think free trade and environmental disputes should be handled by an entity such as GATT, but GATT should include an environmental protection section. Once an entity such as GATT makes a decision, a second body should intervene and review the decision. The United States should be more aggressive in its foreign policy on the environment. The U.S and only the U.S can lead the West in the environmental

Get Access