Toulmin Model Of Argument Analysis

Stephen Toulmin uses his own type of system to help readers analyze arguments. Enthymeme is given as a claim, therefore a warrant is needed in Toulmin’s schema. Following these concepts is backing and grounds. While backing is used to back up one’s sources and arguments to help and support the warrant. Conditions of rebuttal means that the audience should look at the argument as a doubter. The last stage in Toulmin’s schema is to use a qualifier. The argument needs to be ready for a qualifiers to help it a bit more if the facts used to back up isn’t very good to use. Using Toulmin’s schema on the story Dream On by Mark Krikorian will help the audience decide whether the convincing facts can help illegal immigrants. Krikorian uses Toulmin’s schema real well while stating his facts in his written article. Krikorian is an author who writes about just another type of amnesty for illegal immigrants wanting to become legal citizens of the United States of America. Soon to find out that the DREAM Act will fail because it is not sufficient enough to help children under the age of 16 to become legal.

The Toulmin method is an effective way to carefully analyze a text within a written argument. When writing the Toulmin method, the readers can show how effectively or ineffectively the author’s argument is. The article, “Raise Wages, Not Walls,” Michael S. Dukakis and Daniel J. B. Mitchell argue that raising the minimum wages will help solve the immigration issue rather than building walls. The essay has a claim, but has weak supporting evidences and reasons that does not support the claim.

That is what a smartphone represents to us.” This example shows us how smartphones are so important in our lives. They are intertwined in everything that we do to make our lives easier. Also, another immensely effective example is when he said “Some of the students were asked to place their phones in front of them on their desks; others were told to stow their phones in their pockets or handbags; still others were required to leave their phones in a different room.” This is an example of how well kids take tests when smartphones are involved or not involved. They did this to see if it would affect their concentration with the text if their phones were in the desk in their bag or not even in the room at all. A third example is then he says “...insight sheds light on society’s current gullibility crisis, in which people are all too quick to credit lies and half-truths spread through social media. If your phone has sapped your powers of discernment, you’ll believe anything it tells you.” This example shows how much the inventors of these smart devices and social media know that they are having a negative effect on us but do nothing about it. They know that they are taking out ability to tell what is true and what is true and what

Turkle states, “Over the past fifteen years, I’ve studied technologies of mobile connection and talked to hundreds of people of all ages and circumstances about their plugged-in lives,” (Turkle 136). With this statement, Turkle makes aware to the audience that situations in which she will later talk about in her article are based on the research she did over a period of time. Thus, it helps her gain credibility and the audience’s trust that her arguments are being supported by legit circumstances. These real life situations also help strengthen her argument. By using circumstances in which the audience may relate to, it enhances her argument to be more favorable because it creates a connection between the situation and the reader. In another instance where Turkle’s credibility can be seen is when she gives some merit to the contrary point of view. For example, she states, “we can put our attention wherever we want it to be; and that we never have to be alone. Indeed our new devices have turned being alone into a problem that can be solved,” (138). Here, Turkle shows an awareness to the complexity of how technology can also benefit in some way. It shows that she is fair, and not only looking at one side of the issue, thus showing her audience that she is trustworthy and looks at all points of the

The purpose of this analysis is to examine the rhetorical appeals(ethos, etc.) of an argument presented by two different authors who have written about the subject of how technology is affecting our lives. In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, he describes how over the years, using technology has evolved his way of thinking in a negative way. On the other hand, in the article “How technology has changed our parenting lives” by Christine Organ, she promotes the use of technology, for it has improved her as a parent. This paper is to examine the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos found within each of the two articles. While each author had a different viewpoint, their rhetorical appeals show both similarities and differences.

The contrast between technology and humans is talked about in Richard Louv’s article from Last Child in the Woods. He uses great strategies to get his point across to the readers. Louv wants everyone to realize how the times have changed and how important technology has become in our lives. He wants to give us a better understanding of how technology has changed our lives. In this article Louv uses rhetorical strategies to prove to his readers that his points are valid. These strategies are telling stories, using important names, and making jokes.

The first pattern in the essay with accounts of a fictional source, then an actual narrative account, and finally a source that dates back in the far past. This pattern happens at least three times during the essay. The fictional source was about a feeling machine that gets shut down because it was a threat to humans. In the narrative part, the author talks about his accounts relating how he has less patience for reading and basically links his lack of focus to his use of the internet as the problem. The third source in the pattern would be a source from a long time ago that bases itself around how technology changes how a person operates when he tries to do anything else when he learned a new medium for reading or writing. This further backs up his points of how technology can be detrimental for people and lessening them as individuals.

In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.

In arguing that anti-Confederate southerners played a central role in Confederate defeat, Freehling shifts historical debate to ground that is at once familiar and novel. Historians such as Drew Gilpin Faust and Paul Escott have identified internal disaffection as the primary cause of Confederate defeat while Gary Gallagher has suggested that whites in the Confederacy maintained their support for the government even as military losses ended the war.[1] The South vs. the South expands the scope of inquiry, looking beyond internal fissures within the Confederacy to the divisions in broader southern society. In Freehling's telling, anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves sapped Confederate

The evolution of technology is constantly occurring in order to be more helpful in society. Therefore, a new gadget comes out within months or a year because of how it’s constantly evolving and how clients always ask for more. Andrew Sullivan wrote an essay in 2005 and talked the once popular iPod. In his essay, “Society Is Dead, We Have Retreated into the iWorld,” Andrew Sullivan uses the rhetorical triangle, visual imagery, and one of the rhetorical appeals, logos, to achieve his purpose of how technology has impacted human interactions.

Essay three contains my response to Charles Yu’s highly emotional take on technology. Initially, I chose the topic simply due to my interest with technology without sufficiently analyzing the article. As I read more deeply into his tone, word choice, and argument structure, I found a poorly backed argument based almost

The toulmin method is an analysis that goes very in depth in an argument. It breaks the argument in parts and when read it shows how effective the argument is all together. The passage goes over how the United States is facing a problem with illegal immigrants. The author goes over possible ways of overcoming that obstacle by providing clear cut facts and in depth analysis. This overall was a very effective argument due to the author using the toulmin method.

Richard begins with a few horrific events such as Columbine high school massacre. He makes us start to think about the motives behind the events. By talking about the possibility that the technological advances could be isolate us into our fantasies. He suggests that reading, writing and, discussing

Definition of the Teleological Argument • The Teleological Argument is an argument to prove the existence of God from the evidence of order, and design, in nature. • The argument is sometimes referred to as the ‘Argument for Design’ and debates whether the universe has a creator or not. • The term ‘teleological’ derives from the Greek words telos and logos. •

It is amazing how everyone’s life is changing by through us of technology. “Technology by definition means, the branch of knowledge that deals with the creation and use of technical means and their interrelation with life, society, and the environment, drawing upon such subjects as industrial arts, engineering, applied science, and pure science”(Technology). Today people use different kinds of technology like: cellphones, iPods, laptops, mp3s, and all of the devices create a convenient and comfort for every individual. As technology is updating every day, and every second it is affecting people’s lives and changing the pace of everything that relates to humans’ routines. One of the most important things that technology changes is the way everyone communicates. Technologies create more powerful and effective ways of communication. People are getting used to a new way to be alone together. Conversation in number and quality decrease as technology replaces in human interaction. In this article author gives insight into how technology distracts people without considering what price they are paying and persuades how technology has a huge effect on people’s conversation.