Liberalism/Totalitarian essay for Mahmud II
Thomas Jefferson once said, “The purpose of government is to enable the people of a nation to live in safety and happiness. Government exists for the interests of the governed, not for the governors” (McAdam np). In a totalitarian system, however, this is often not the case. Because it requires complete subservience from its citizens and focus primarily on power, a totalitarian government does not, if fact, exist for the interests of the people. Mahmud II’s various policies reveal his totalitarian tendencies regarding issues both foreign and domestic.
Mahmud’s domestic policies were influenced by his military failures. After a long string of defeats, he decided to abolish military fiefs for
…show more content…
Mahmud did everything he could to stop the Greeks from gaining their freedom but was ultimately unsuccessful. During the Greek War, Mahmud allied his Ottomans with the Egyptians, and was regaining control until he was defeated by a fleet from Russia, France and Britain. Outraged by his defeat, Mahmud turned and declared war on Russia. His Ottomans were again defeated, forcing him to recognize the need for military reforms. Fighting in multiple wars and recklessly declaring war against Russia demonstrate the totalitarian characteristics “increased state military power”, along with “imperial conquest and authoritarian rule over the colonized.” Interestingly, repeated failure on the battlefield did not stop him from trading with European nations later in his …show more content…
His strategies were largely unsuccessful, and he left the throne with much less than when he took it. Even within his empire he was viewed negatively, as emphasized by this quote from The story of the Greatest Nations, where it says, “His career has been mocked at by his own people who have hated his innovations; his purposes had been foiled by foes whose subtlety dug deeper than his own; and he had brought his throne to what seemed hopeless ruin” (Ellis 15). He constantly was trying to increase state, government and military power. Mahmud’s reign shows that
The Common Factors that Led to the Establishment of Totalitarian Regimes in Italy and Germany in the Inter-War Period
Alexander never lost a battle. He conquered much of the Ancient world, and only surrendered his goals when his army was not ready to fight. As seen in document A, his empire was huge and unmatched by any in history. He also achieved what many thought was impossible; he defeated the robust Persian army. Alexander's remarkable achievements are a result of his courage and determination, leading him to his outstanding battle record.
World War II was a tremendously impactful war which was fought during the forties. It had many turning points and great changes that turned not only the United States but the world. One of the first events that occurred was the rise of Communism. With the rise of communism it caused panic in the country of the United States. The panic was inevitable because anyone could be suspected of being a communist. Also, with communism rapidly spreading in Europe it was hard for the United States to stay in a state of isolationism. Therefore, a key factor of the United States abandoning isolationism and joining the war was the incidence of Pearl Harbor. The bombing of Pearl Harbor was sent by Japan. As a result, the United States declared war on Japan and World War II started. After the war, the impact continued. After World War II, the Cold War began; which was a start to a race in technology, space, and power. The Cold War lasted several decades and was a reaction to World War II.
His Coup D’œil in battle gained him great victories on the Granicus and at Issus. He was then able to aptly transition these victories into his campaign objectives which supported his clear goal of conquering all of Persia with as little bloodshed as possible. He won decisive victories at key points to ensure that he would be able to operate his sieges against the Persian cities that were hesitant to surrender to him. Simply put, Alexander, one of history’s greatest military geniuses, utilized all the aspects of his Kingdom to wage a highly effective war against the Persian King Darius that eventually resulted in the creation of one of the largest empire’s in
In the late 1930’s, totalitarian dictators in Europe and Asia were running rampant. Adolf Hitler took over Germany and proceeded to take over Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland. In Italy, Benito Mussolini invaded Ethiopia. Emperor Hirohito and General Hideki Tojo of Japan invaded Korea, Manchuria, and the rest of China. In the Soviet Union, Josef Stalin used his Secret Police to kill anyone who opposed him and then helped Germany take over Poland. The League of Nations watched on, powerless to do anything as Europe began to fall. They tried to appease Germany by ignoring the capture of Austria, but Germany took advantage of it and took over other countries. The United States had not joined the League of Nations because they wanted to remain isolated. They had once again
He also improved the army, he inherited from his father greatly by the addition of allied forces. His improvements made his army impossible to defeat and the most feared in the world. Although he was swift to defeat his enemies, he still took his time and emphasized on strategy. A great example of his great strategic mind was that rather than strike Asia immediately, he spent nearly two years, securing the coastal areas of Levant and Asia Minor in order to ensure that Persian naval forces would not send back his lines to Europe. Slowly but surely he defeated the western sections of the Persian Empire before driving into the Iranian plateau and
In a matter of eleven years, Alexander the Great rode more than 10,000 miles and fought 70 battles without losing a single one – he conquered from Egypt to India. His accomplishments were made possible by his father, Philip of Macedon. “Philip took advantage of the fact that the Greek city-states were divided by years of squabbling and infighting. Philip succeeded in doing what years of fighting between city-states had not done. He united Greece.”
The Totalitarian Aspects of Nazi Germany The government of Nazi Germany was a fascist, totalitarian state. They ruled in Germany ever since Hitler became chancellor in 1933, to 1945. Totalitarianism was a form of government in which the state involves itself in all facts of society, including the daily life of its citizens. It penetrates and controls all aspects of public and private life, through the state's use of propaganda, terror and technology.
Do unto others what one would want done unto him or herself. In World War II with Nazi control in much of Europe, even if individuals had problems with how certain people were being treated, not many actually took action. A particular person who decided to counter the flow of what was accepted, was Pastor André Trocmé. That particular pastor was a member of a small French village, Le Chambon-sur-Lignon. There, many Jewish people were housed and protected as much as the small community could provide from their Nazi persecutors; who otherwise would have put into concentration camps or in some cases death camps. The entirety of the village needed to work together in order to achieve the pursuits they hoped to accomplish. The level of their
Afghanistan is one of the poorest and most troubled countries in the world. The land that occupies Afghanistan has a long history of domination by foreign conquerors and strife among internally warring factions. At the gateway between Asia and Europe, this land was conquered by Darius I of Babylonia circa 500 B.C., and Alexander the Great of Macedonia in 329 B.C., among others. In recent years, war and lawlessness had destroyed much of the country; millions of people went into exile and brought its economy to a standstill. This paper looks to explore the recent history of Afghanistan, how the Taliban came to power, and the impact their Islamic laws had on the Afghanistan society including their treatment of
not weak. He was the source of power if you wanted to get ahead in the
Totalitarianism alludes to a political framework in which all power is in the hands of the state. In a totalitarian culture, all control of open and private life are government run. Brave New World and 1984 were both novels composed by men who had encountered war on the amazing size of the twentieth century. Baffled and frightened by what they found in the public arena, both creators delivered an intense parody and a disturbing vision of conceivable future outcomes. In spite of the fact that the two books are altogether different, they both address a considerable amount of the same issues, but in differentiating ways.
The theme of my portfolio is “The Little Writer That Could.” This, of course, is a parody of “The Little Engine That Could.” I chose this theme because of my history as a writer. Up until this year, I have never been confident in myself as a writer. I have always had to constantly tell myself that I would be okay and that I would get better as time went on. I remained at an adequate writing level until recently. I feel so much more confident in myself as a writer now. The theme of that book was that the little engine overcame his problem and fear of not being able to make it over the hill. I view my inability to write as my hill and I am now on my way to the top of it. The fonts I used to make the title are ones I found on the internet. I tried
Nazi Germany: A Totalitarian State? The purpose of this essay is to explain whether Nazi Germany was a totalitarian state or not. Totalitarian state means when all aspects of life within a country are under the total control of a person or group, this is often referred to as a dictator. The aspects of life in Nazi Germany that I am going to examine are young people, women, the church, employment, leisure time, propaganda and censorship.
hroughout history, advancements in society and culture have come from individuals, not minority groups, or ideologies. In the historical timeline of humanity, equality has never existed; it is an abstract, a belief, for which the west is now paying the price. Is this a coup or a revolution, an accident or an intended consequence? Consequently, as the cultural chaos continues, the accelerating continuation of equality and politically correct moral relativism throw up some important questions.