Taxes on tea, taxes on legal documents/paper, taxes on gas, lead, paint. All these laws and more are what eventually got the American Colonists to go against Great Britain and eventually breaking away. Until 1776, the American thirteen colonies were under British rule. During the years that the colonies were under British rule, the colonists were treated extremely poorly. The British created many unjust laws against the colonists. Some of the many unjust laws were the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Act of 1767, the Tea Act of 1773, and the Intolerable Acts of 1774. All of these laws eventually lead to the Boston Massacre, then The Boston Tea party, and the Battle of Lexington. All together all these events brought up to the Revolutionary War. Justify; "to show or prove to be right or reasonable". The American Colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Great Britain. …show more content…
The American Colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain because the Britain had unfair laws against the colonists. Throughout the time the Colonists were under British rule, the Colonists were treated horribly and in a cruel manner. One of the laws the British created that was unfair to the Colonists was the Tea Act. The Tea Act was created to force Colonists to pay taxes when they bought tea. A piece of evidence that proves that Britain had unfair laws against the colonists is in document 2. In document 2, John Dickinson talks about how the British parliament had no intentions what so ever of forcing the colonists to work until the
The American colonies were justified in their response to the taxes King George III and Parliament applied on the colonist as Britain allowed this new world to form its own reality and sense of independence by refusing to financially support the colonies and ignoring the large gap that developed over time between the colonies and Britain.
The Colonists were very much justified to break for independence and freedom from the British rule. The way the British tried to rule over the Colony helped feed the spark of revolution. The British were making the Colonists feel like they never got away from Britain and the King's rule. They made a British Parliament with no American representatives, taxed them for the French and Indian war, and sent in troops to live in their homes. These are just three of the many events that started the spark of revolution.
Before the American Revolution in 1775 the British were in major dept so they decided to tax the colonists. This made the colonist very furious so they started to protest against the Britains like dumping 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor, loyalists were being tarred and feathered, and many more horrible things. The colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from the Britains for many reasons for example the Britain's enforced many taxes like the Stamp Act, tea act, and the Townshend Act. The colonists were also justified in breaking away from the British because the British were very tyrant towards the colonist like the quartering act, the intolerable act, and the Boston Massacre.
Were the American Colonists justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain? The American colonists were right in waging war and breaking away from Britain because they had no role in Parliament, they were unable to use the land that they won after the French and Indian war, they are scared that the government will rule even more unfairly. The colonists had no role or vote in the british parliament. In document E, the king had “Establishment over an absolute tyranny over these states.”
The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind, not only justified but also it was about time that they stood of and actually take action against the British. The choice of going to war with them, was the only choice that they had. All diplimatical options that they had ceased to stand a chance against the tyrant Britain. From the very beginning when the colonists felt upset against their mother country and the way that they went about the law making, up until the beginning of the war, they tried all diplimatical options that they had, by sending letters, you name it. When they didn’t work then they had no other means but to declare war.
American colonists should support the Declaration of Independence and the Patriots in the Revolutionary War. Great Britain was taxing the American colonists because of Britain’s great debt from the French and Indian War. Britain made the quartering act, the stamp act, townshend act, and the tea act. This is taxation without representation and it was unjust. The Patriots were angry and rightfully so. The King was making the colonists pay taxes on imported goods to decrease his country’s debt, the Patriots were outraged and wanted freedom.
About a decade before the American Revolution happened in 1775, there were lots of tension building up between the colonists and the British. The colonists did not like being under British rule and control because they liked freedom and wanted independence. However, the British government attempted to raise tax revenues by imposing more taxes on the colonists to pay for the leftover debts from the Indian-French War. Some of the laws passed include the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Tariffs of 1767, and the Tea Act of 1773. Some events that escalated the tension include the Boston Massacre, the Boston Tea Party, etc. The colonists were justified in rebelling against Britain.
The beliefs which made the United States of America the prodigious country it is today, began during it’s early colonization-a time in the life of this great nation which is everlastingly remembered with pride. America 's foundation rested upon the ideals of diversity, innovation, and the ability to exhibit strength in the face of adversity; there are few who have embodied this vision of America more completely than Pocahontas and Benjamin Franklin. Tragic and historical events developed during the lives of Pocahontas and Benjamin Franklin; although their individual situations required very different reactions, both persevered, therefore granting those who came after them the ability to reflect on America’s beginnings with admiration and pride.
According to the Declaration Of Independence, abuse of the representative powers and their natural rights gave the people the right to eliminate their current government and create a new one. Thomas Jefferson outlines the mistakes of the British government, and asserts that citizens were restricted of natural rights. In such case, during the American Revolution, colonies had the right to get rid of their government because the king was not rightly protecting the citizens rights. Not only that, but direct taxes were enforced upon the citizens leading to acts being passed in opposition to the rebellion. All things considered, I would say that the American Revolution was justified under the Declaration of Independence.
“Give me liberty or give me death!” Patrick Henry. I believe that the Colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain and the King. King George was making the Colonists pay very unfair taxes, he was trying to rule over them from all the way over in England, and he wouldn’t take the colonies legislators opinions into consideration. While some people may say that the Colonists were just unappreciative, that is not correct. They continued to stay with the King until the King turned on them and made them do things they didn’t want to do and shouldn’t have to do.
The first reason that the colonists were justified in breaking away from the British was because the British Parliament and soldiers made unjust decisions for their own personal gain and abused their powers over the colonists. As stated in Document 2 of the packet “Document-Based Questions--Path to Revolution”, the British parliament taxed the colonists for the sole purpose of levying money upon them (Stamp Act). The taxes was also mainly used to pay for the French-Indian War, which seems like it justifies the British taxing, except for the fact that it was taxes without representation, which can be labeled as tyranny. This supports my argument, as the American colonists didn’t like having to pay for the war, and let Britain take money away from them for profit. Another piece of evidence that supports my claim would be that on Document 10 of the packet it was stated that, “We have understood it be
Both mom and child’s urine tested positive for amphetamines and Camellia also tested positive for meth amphetamines. The child did not have any known complications at delivery. Ms. Godwin became very emotional when confronted with the allegations and denied taking any kind of medications or drugs. The child’s father was present and stated he would take the blame because he sent Tobi to a friend’s home to pick up his clothes; the friends used meth and Tobi made contact. The reporter stated that the unknown father was emotional as well and took responsibility for the positive meth in Tobi’s
Imagine a country where the government could do anything they wanted because it was simply their “right.” The revolution was caused by a series of events which were started by the king passing taxes on the colonists and enforcing laws which were violating the civilians natural rights. There has been an argument since the war started about whether the colonists were justified in declaring independence and breaking away from their home country. The American colonists were justified in waging war for independence against Britain because the british government ignored countless formal petitions sent, the government didn’t have the right to impose taxes on the settlers, and Britain waged war against the colonists.
1763 marked the end of French and Indian war and caused a great celebration and pride in the American colonies. But, in next twelve years, the same pride was altered by at bitter and violent conflict with the mother country. The injustices of the mother country finally led the American colonists to declare independence and wage war against it. American colonies were justified for waging war and breaking away from Britain because they were defending themselves against a series of measures Parliament wished to impose on their communities without their consent.
The future of nursing relates to a greater need of increased patient quality of care. There are essential skills required in the world of advanced practice nursing that can only be offered through the continuance of education along with specialized training. My future role as a nurse administrator and family nurse practitioner is evident as research shows that a major shortage of advanced practice nurses as well as nurse leaders as clinicians in the world of healthcare is absent today. A nursing administrator has multiple capabilities as the role of this type of leader requires heightened awareness to the needs of the healthcare team as well as a strategic plan for growth. The family nurse practitioner role offers the advantages of additional knowledge in many areas that expands the scope of practice of the provider. The implementation of both roles can serve as a breakthrough in the healthcare delivery system by offering the perspective and expertise to the future of healthcare.