preview

Timothy Findley's The Wars

Better Essays

The Fragments of History;
Deconstructing the Past and the Present in The Wars
Timothy Findley in his novel The Wars uses a postmodern device where the narration is nonlinear in chronology, making it subjective and more based on memory, ultimately deeming the reader’s perception of the past and the present to be precarious and unreliable. The Wars focuses on a young Canadian WWI officer named Robert Ross. Robert’s story is recounted after his death through many other characters such as Marian Turner, Lady Juliet d’Orsey, and the archivists. Yet, these characters are separated from Robert Ross through one main medium: time. Since these characters are separated from Robert Ross through time and space, the consistency of their perception comes …show more content…

Marian knows that Robert had shot a man, and yet is angry at the M.P. officer who stayed with Robert as a guard to make sure he did not escape. Marian does not quite understand this though as, “where should he escape to? Death? A few brief hours of sleep? The painless tranquillity of morphine? I tell you it nearly drove me mad” (Findley, 194). However, one would assume her position is justified because of where and who she is in time and in space. As a nurse, it is her job to look at patients as patients and to give them the best possible care. To her, Robert Ross was always a broken and disfigured man, and to deem a disabled man a murderer is absurd. Yet, the reader’s perception of Robert Ross is purposely ambiguous and absurd. Ross is both and neither a victim or oppressor.It is unclear if Robert himself should be seen as a traitor and murderer for killing his fellow soldiers, or just a burn victim, another innocent casualty of war. Similarly, the reader may also question Marian’s reliability and accuracy especially since a great amount of time has passed. However, since she was with Robert after possibly the most catastrophic moment of his life, and so she may be the only trustworthy source the reader and the archivist have in order to gain knowledge of Robert personally. Maurice Aymard in her journal describes the frustration of trying to piece together history from personal memories: “Never have memory’s tools been more powerful or more efficient, yet never has the relationship between history and memory seemed more uncertain. History has lost its monopoly over the production and conservation of memory; memory has developed independently” (Aymard, 7). Aymard explains that while the use of memory to uncover and produce

Get Access