Timothy Chappell 's Moral Theory

Goodman begins his essay with a lengthy introduction regarding his sources and inspiration, but the problems with his challenge to moral relativism begin almost the moment he gets

In this paper, I am going to explain what two moral theories I mainly use to make a moral decision. In this paper, I used the textbook to help me figure out what moral theories are and it helped me decide which moral theories to use that best fit me when I make moral decisions. The two moral theories that I chose to highlight in this paper are utilitarianism and cultural relativism because I believe that they are the two that best fit me when I make a moral decision. The definition of morals is “a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is or is not acceptable for them to do”. Morals are an important thing to have because it is good to know what is and isn’t

Conversely, by looking at it from the perspective that morals should not be the basis of decision making, you can see that if we don’t use them, then many people can get hurt as a result. If people make choices without thinking of the consequences or about what is important to them and the people around them, the wrong choice may be made. While morals shouldn’t be the only thing considered, they must be taken into account to ensure the right things are being done. If we only base our actions on morals, then some very important past discoveries may not have been made. If people only consider morals than not only will decisions be biased as each person has different morals, but many things in history may not have been accomplished. For example, the nuclear bomb may not have been invented or people might

As talked about in Berk there are many factors that impact our understanding of morals. Kohlberg believed that various experiences influenced and cause “cognitive challenges” and in turn allow them to moral questions and situations in more complicated ways. Some of these influences could be school, friends, and culture (Berk, 2014)

Morals are a constant force that do not change. If so called morals vary, they aren’t really morals. While it may be more understandable in a certain situation why someone doesn’t follow their morals, it doesn’t make it right. For example, if a friend asks for an opinion on their outfit, and someone lies to them to spare their opinion, it’s still lying, and therefore it’s immoral. The circumstances shouldn’t change people’s morals, and if they do, it’s a testament to the weakness of the beliefs held by the person themselves, not the situation.

The idea of morals is one which makes up a large part of who a person is. For some, it is what gives them purpose, for others, it can be the factor that defines their entire lives. Depending on who you talk to, it is the one thing that separates us from animals, our ability to have our own set of values that ultimately created the society that exists in today’s world. When people discuss morals, they all seem set on the right and the wrong, and that nothing would cause them to change their beliefs, no matter the circumstances. For some, however, there comes a point where no such decision can be made; when placed in an extreme circumstance, there becomes no such option other than to abandon their long-held beliefs and decide that one person’s

Morals, as defined by psychologist, are the attitudes and beliefs held by individuals that aid in the determination or what is right and what is wrong (Hock 142). It is believed that what is deemed moral is determined by our culture and the norms present in that culture. It is also believed that we are not born with an established set of morals; instead, we must gain this outline of what is moral throughout our childhood and adolescence and into adulthood.

The link between morality and human nature has been a progressive reoccurring theme since ancient times (Prinz, 2008). Moral development is a characteristic of a person’s general development that transpires over the course of a lifetime. Moral development is derived by a wide variety of cultural and demographic factors that appear to influence morally relevant actions. Turiel (2006) defined morality as an individuals “prescriptive judgments of justice, rights, and welfare pertaining to how people ought to relate to each other.” Individuals’ moral judgments are frequently considered to be a product of culturally specific controls that provide a framework for behavioral motivations that are sensitive to the effects of gender, education, religion and politics (Banerjee, Huebner & Hauser, 2010). While several approaches have been utilized to examine the interaction of multivariate contributors to fundamental moral differences such as: disputes about family life, sexuality, social fairness, and so on, research has suggested that ideological considerations have provided a potent and diverse explanation for the polarization of contrasting views (Weber & Federico, 2013).

It is a recognized truth that actions have consequences. Similarly, it is widely acknowledged that beliefs have repercussions. The actions of a person are derived from his/her beliefs. For everyone in the world, some things are right while some are wrong. Hence, it simply means that every person lives his life following a system of morality and ethics. The human family acknowledges morals and ethics as traits that are universally accepted. It is, therefore, necessary to have an explanation for them. There are only two ways to understand them. Firstly, it is the mind of God that originated morals. Secondly, they have been originated from within man himself ("The Existence of," 2001).

Many things can contribute to what you think is morally right or wrong. Religion, for example, may create a barrier on to what extent you do something. Some religions set rules, or guidelines on which they limit what people do. Cultures, as well, contribute to people’s decisions. Many times our values and ethics disagree with different people who hold different

Throughout life one has to make many decisions. Many of these decisions are based on morals. The Merriam-Webster dictionary describes the word moral as “relating to principles of right and wrong behavior.” I personally believe that the moral decisions one makes are highly dependent on their life, family, and their careers (or lack thereof).

As time goes by, ethical and moral issues have been brought up for long periods of time and these issues are recently becoming the rising problem to be discussed in society, business area and daily life. Most of people generally understand that the general meaning of ethics equals to the meaning of moral. However, moral is basically a matter of individual conscience without forcibleness, but ethics are related to social system with forcibleness. The academic definition of ethics is described as a stem of philosophy which raises moral questions and is demonstrated what is the main characteristic of morality and the way in which moral standards are decided (Gray & Webb, 2010).

While looking at Ethics, we can see the direct correlation and relationship that it has on our decision making. Ethics ties in the assumption that one has moral knowledge. This thought is produced to support the notion that one’s moralistic values directly influence the knowledge or perception on knowledge. Moral obligation is thought to require some form of action, again bringing in the notion that one’s moral belief system plays a huge part in the shaping of their conclusions. A conclusion can be defined by a judgement or decision reached by reasoning, bringing in the thought that this could possibly be a contemplative decision. There are so many ethical implications that support ones

Everyday we are tested as individuals to make the right choice. How we view ourselves as individuals and how others view us are directly correlated to our moral decision-making. But morals are somewhat misleading. What might be a wrong decision for one person might be a solution to another. So how do we define morals? Do we follow Gods’ moral rules because to do so would increase out likelihood of obtaining salvation in the afterlife? Or is it simpler than that. Is God going to deny our entrance into heaven because we have run a stop sign here and there? No. I believe our moral values are much simpler than that. I believe that our moral decision-making comes from our upbringing of what is right or wrong. Our parents and

The theory of moral development, advanced by psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg is one of the most well-known persuasive theories in the field of cognitive science and stems from the work of Jean Piaget, which hypothesizes on the direct correlation that exists between moral and cognitive development. Kohlberg speaks of the appearance and understanding of what is right and wrong from childhood to adulthood and explains by this transition through the identification of various levels of morality known as pre-conventional, conventional and post conventional. People will make decisions based on the understanding of the possible outcome and through reasoning of morals. (Target Concept)