This model predicts that White pre-retirees have a significantly higher positive impact on the accumulation of financial assets as compared to non-White pre-retirees. This finding supports the hypothesis and previous research that addresses the income and wealth differences between races.
As expected, the log of income was statistically significant to the accumulation of financial assets. As noted earlier, a nonlinear relationship exists between income and financial assets as pre-retirees are predicted to accumulate wealth, while also increasing consumption, as their resources increase. The impact of income on the growth of financial assets is positive, yet lessens as the value of income increases. For example, a one percent increase in
…show more content…
The mortgage payment in this model was not a statistically significant indicator for predicting financial assets, although the payment to the second mortgage was a statistically significant indicator negatively impacting the value of financial assets. The home equity line of credit payment was statistically significant at the .05 level for predicting a decrease to financial assets. The HELOC represents an important source of liquidity for borrowers. However, the risk of borrowing equity from the home decreases resources that would be available in retirement and increases the number of years required to pay off the home.
Pre-retirees with medical debt were expected to accumulate a lower amount of financial resources as compared to pre-retirees not burdened with medical debt. However, the payment of installment loans by the household is not a significant predictor of financial assets in the model. Moreover, the payment on the first line of credit was not a statistically significant predictor of financial assets for pre-retirees. Conversely, vehicle payments and consumer loan payments are statistically significant predictors negatively impacting financial assets. These types of debts consist of items that are consumed quickly or that consistently depreciate over a short period of time. With easy access to these forms of credit, a significant number of pre-retirees are servicing credit card debt and paying
In this essay I shall be discussing the factors which influence the level of and access to unsecured debt held by households.
In his book “Being Black, Living in the Red”, Dalton Conley argues that asset accumulation is responsible for the wealth gap between blacks and whites. He claims that racial discrimination plays a small role in this disparity among post-Civil Rights generations. Instead, he asserts that factors such as parental net worth and education can determine black limitations. He also believes that a radical wealth based policy will address the disparity between the races. I agree with the author’s claims to a certain extent.
Along with racism’s effect on the economic status of communities, it also impacts African Americans in other aspects of the financial realm. As Peggy McIntosh explains in her essay, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Backpack,” she, as a white person, “can count on [her] skin color not to work against the appearance of financial reliability” (McIntosh). Thus, institutionalized racism still makes it more difficult for Blacks to become financially stable compared to whites. According the Pew Research Center, the net worth of a white person was 13 times greater than that of a Black person in 2013, even though slavery had been abolished nearby 150 years prior (Fry, Kochlar). Likewise, in 1970 about 4 percent of whites and 62 percent of Blacks
According to Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors, whites are more likely to earn a better childhood education, have more access to technology, attend college, attain a stable job, and have benefits of healthcare. Jensen emphasizes the difficulties for black citizens to locate employment because of the employer’s prejudice against them. Many statistics provided by the author exhibit this disadvantage, “the typical black family had 60% as much income as a white family in 1968, but only 58% as much in 2002” (Jensen5). Additionally, it’s
wealth had no concern for the minorities of America. They were left behind to cultivate the
Earning a college degree has long been considered—one of the major keys in achieving the American Dream. However, contrary to popular belief, that theory has been proven invalid. According to a recent study from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRBOSL), “Education does not help black and Hispanic college graduates protect their wealth the same way that it does for their white and Asian counterparts.”
(Keister 2004). By only focusing on the longitudinal survey, the NLS-Y sample includes 12,686 individuals, ages fourteen to twenty-two. In her data results, she finds that most Hispanic and Black youths tend to be the ones who live in extended families and are disproportionally affected by family disruptions, thus subsidizing less in adult wealth (Keister 2004). In regards to the longitudinal survey, she emphasizes that the NLS-Y is an ideal source to answer any questions regarding family background and adult wealth. With detailed information about wealth holdings, family background, life transitions and adulthood (Keister 2004), she emphasizes that the NLS-Y data are consistent and has been successfully used to estimate family processes leading to adult
“Growing Apart: The Evolution of Income vs. Wealth Inequality” written by Michael Cragg and Rand Ghayad is an article about how wealth distribution in America has dramatically changed within the last three decades and how it has become one of the most political and economic trends in this nation. The main priority of the article is that it talked about how the wealth and financial statues in the United States has favored in the upper class and has opposed the middle and lower class within the last three decades. The first subdivision talked about how income inequality and wealth inequality are both different and how wealth inequality has a bigger negativity on the United States economic growth. The second subdivision talked about how if the
There are a few reasons why home value rises a lot more for whites than African-Americans on the grounds that whites are significantly more ready to give family monetary help, bigger in advance installments by white property holders lower interest rates and loaning expenses. As anyone might expect, increments in pay are a noteworthy wellspring of riches amassing for some US families. However,income picks up for whites and African-Americans have an altogether different effect on riches. At the individual riches medians, each dollar increment in normal wage over the 25-year study period included $5.19 riches for white families, while the same salary increase just included 69 pennies of riches for African American families. Most Americans inherit next to nothing or no cash at all. in view of college a normal
Debt accumulation for middle-class and lower-class households rose significantly in the decades prior to the crisis. (Within the financial sector, debt rose from “22 percent of GDP in 1981 to 117 percent in 2008). As households spent more and saved less, they began relying heavily on loans and speculation to sustain their spending. The housing market in the late 1990s and early 2000s became the primary focus of spending--with banks giving out loans for houses far beyond the financial means of the one’s acquiring them. As J. D. Wisman asserted in Wage Stagnation, Rising Inequality, and the Financial Crisis, “the housing market was greatly stimulated by very low interest rates
As you can see in the graph “Expected Financial Capital and Human Capital over the Working-Life Cycle”, as the investor ages (pre-retirement) human capital decreases and their financial wealth increases.
Therefore, I’m going to justify this information I have acquainted you with.First thing, you need to know is that I’m not against anyone I’m neither racist or bias.I was born in a city of diversity which is called New York City. However, the things I’m about to tell you may be uncomfortable or maybe even interesting.Digging deep into America’s seventeen trillion dollar economy and you’ll find fractures beneath the surface.The spoils are split unevenly between men and women, old and young. But, one of the most massive disparities is only skin deep.Everything you own houses, stocks, and cars are your wealth. According to “Blacks still far behind whites in wealth and income” by Tanzina Vega, In 2011 the wealth of the median white household was over $110,000. African American on average was 17 times less just over $6,314.” Housing has a lot to do with this massive separation.For the average American, their home is the most valuable
Many risks occur when gaining wealth, such as debt. People of high risk of often assume debts is not a problem for them. They begin to assume that they can pay back debt loans when they get more money, putting themselves further in debt even more than before. Recurrently, they will remain
During this time period, homeownership typically required a 20 percent down payment (Melicher & Norton, 2014, 168). Lending institutions were very careful about whom they lent money to, and credit standards were high (Melicher & Norton, 2014, 168). Melicher & Norton (2014) called this the “save now, spend later” philosophy, and it would change in the coming years (p. 168).
In relation to the increase in house’s price, the rise of financial agreements such as mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO) encouraged investors to invest in the U.S housing market (Krugman, 2009). When housing price declined in the U.S, many financial institutions that borrowed and invested in subprime mortgage reported losses. In addition, the fall of housing price resulted in default and foreclosure and that began to exhaust consumer’s wealth and