The representation of youths in ‘A Clockwork Orange’ and ‘If….’
I will be investigating how youth is represented in the films A clockwork orange (1972) and If…. (1968) and how the films affected the views of the time and how the films influenced youths.
I have chosen to investigate these films because of how both films were released at the time of the relaxation of violence in cinema.
I also chose these films because the similar themes in both films, as both films focus on youths in society and there place in society, And also how Malcolm McDowell’s character Michael Arnold "Mick" Travis in ‘If….’ served as an inspiration for his character in Stanley Kubrick’s ‘A clockwork orange’ Alex Delarge and the similarities between the two
…show more content…
This is one of the main theories I will be applying to the two films I will be analysing, ‘IF….’ And ‘A Clockwork Orange’.
One of the main things I that is important in both films are the costume, in both film are ‘uniforms seen on many of the characters throughout the film, in a clockwork orange, set in a dystopian future Britain, Alex and his ‘Droogs’ wear a specific uniform and so do other ‘gang’ type groups of youths in the film, this is intertextuality of youth at the time were many teenager became part of a group by the way they dressed with the Mods, Rockers, Teddy boys and later the Punks, it was very commonly know that wore these types of uniforms. The youthful characters in if…. Also wear a uniform, the film is set in a boarding school in England so most of the characters you see, except the teachers wear a school uniform. In both films there is also a clear difference between the teenage characters and the character that represent authority in each film, in A Clockwork Orange when Alex is arrested all of the prisoners wear matching suits and the prison guards and anyone that has authority over is wearing a suit, this is the a stereotype a the typical ‘man’ accepted in society showing how Alex is being changed to fit this stereotype in the film when is his realised from prison and he’s wearing a suit and so are some of this old friends.
There is also a change in costume in if…., for the final scene, the main protagonists change into a causal military style
After completing your movie analysis, you will reflect on the analysis process and how you have learned to more thoroughly analyze film as well as how rigorous study of film enhances your development as a student and thinker. In this 300- to 600-word reflection, review your initial post from the “Post Your Introduction” discussion in Week One, and consider how your ability to analyze movies has changed or grown. Append your reflection to the analysis portion of your paper. Your reflection should be personal and exploratory in
? The film becomes a different thing in the same sense that a historical painting becomes a different thing from the historical event which it illustrates. It is as
1. Sobchack’s argument pertaining to on -screen violence that she wrote thirty years ago was that any violent acts portrayed in movies back then was to emphasize the importance of an element in a story, an emphatic way of engaging the viewers and forcing them to feel what the movie was about. It gave them a sense of the substance of the plot which would allow them to feel for the characters and yearn for good to overcome evil. In other words, the effort made to engage audiences through depictions of violence created violence that was artistic and well done, or as Sobchack writes, violence was “aestheticized.” Violence was incorporated into film in a stylistic
Bart Layton built this doc not from one perspective, but from a collection of them. Some stories, like “The Imposter” need a panoptic approach to connect the audience to the film. The themes of manipulation, identity and love are the main themes conveyed by Layton. These themes are communicated through sounds and visual imagery.
Quentin Tarantino is well known and often criticized for his depiction of violence in his films. Although at times graphic, Tarantino’s violence holds a purpose. This paper will look at two films, Jackie Brown and Pulp Fiction, and their depiction of violence and the aesthetics used. It will also look at classic film conventions and ultraviolence aesthetics used by Tarantino.
Both movies have a strong focus on Rock and Roll. Rock and Roll was an important genre in the 1950s. Rock and Roll was thought to be the root of sexuality and aggression from teens at this time (Altschuler, Glenn 2004). This is exactly how the teens acted in both movies, with anger and without a care for consequence in many situations. The students showed anxiety, frustration, anger and grief; all complemented by the music choices within the
Movies are constantly created by producers and writers to convey a particular meaning to their audience they are reaching out too. The meaning can be interpreted in several ways. For example, one can understand the meaning that was intended by the creators, or it could be an individual’s own understanding of a storyline in the movie. As a movie can be viewed through different perspectives, a dominant male named Louis Althusser created the theory of Interpellation and the Role of ISAs and RSAs to help further understand movies. Althusser’s theory explains that people in power will remain in power and others will be controlled by those in power (Hartt-Fournier, Lecture 2). Furthermore, the role of ISA, known as the Ideological State
4. What was the film’s purpose or thesis? Was it clear or did you have to infer it?
Though there may be little to no exposure to these ideas in the classroom, students will encounter them as they consume mass entertainment media. Social class disparity has long been a reoccurring theme in film. Adolescents and young adults
A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess, develops a fictional account of a violent futuristic society, while integrating commentary on current political and social issues.
Perhaps some of the most common patterns of thought in this movie are persuasion, conformity, and minority influence.
A Clockwork Orange demonstrates the philosophically issues of free will and determinism through how the main character was treated in the movie. It also addresses important issues such as ethics, philosophy of the mind, free will and determinism, and the problem of perception. Philosophers such as John Hospers, B.F. Skinner, and Jean-Paul Sartre have different views on the issue through their theories of how individuals are or are not responsible for the free will choices that they make in life. The main character in the movie was a very violent , and reckless person. He participated in sinful acts such as being a gang member, raping women, being involved in fights, etc. These actions resulted in him being sent to prison and eventually being brainwashed into doing things out of his character. The three philosophers have very different interpretations of how the main character should have been dealt with and the reasonings behind his actions.
In order to imbue rebellion to the nadsat culture, the use of this slang also conveys a novelty within the subculture that discerns nadsat from the society. In her work, Manning states that “Language isn't static” and it evolves constantly, creating new words and slangs through time. As the slang used in the novella is always in vogue, inventive and evolving, nadsat is easily able to confuse mature people. During Alex’s talk with Dr. Brodsky narrator explains; “He didn't get nadsat-talk at all” as Alex’s use of words such as “pee and em” confuses his company. Dr. Brodsky’s disorientation can be regarded as the manifestation of the rapidly evolving nature of the youth and unceasing search for identity in each generation.
There are many ways that one can analyze a work of art. To say that something as complex as artistic expression can only be looked at or defined in one dimension is nothing short of a lie. In realizing this, we must also realize that film is like any work of art, the many messages and ideas behind a well thought-out film are nearly uncountable. With that in mind, perhaps one of the best ways to analyze film is through a method known as "Cognitive Psychology". Cognitive psychology deals greatly with practical perception, emotional, and conscious responses of viewers. By using cognitive psychology, we seek to explain how we recognize objects, fit disparate elements into orderly patterns, experience joy and sadness through art, and simultaneously understand multiple meanings and so forth. When we apply this theory in practice, it revolutionizes the way in which we can see the meaning behind movies, instead of relying on traditional concepts and roles to determine the ideas behind a work of film; we can shift the critical emphasis on a film to the viewer. In effect then, the viewer becomes an active participant in the creation of a film's effects and meanings. While there are a wide variety of movies that can be looked at using this method, perhaps one of those that come easiest to mind is Memento, a thriller in which the main character is afflicted with antro-grade amnesia, or the inability to create new
i Suoi Fratelli, it is beneficial to analyse these films with reference to two sub-themes: