Introduction
Interest in leadership has increased in the twentieth century, especially the question of how people become leaders? Leadership is the leading topic in social psychology and there are many theories that try to explain different aspects of leadership. Do certain qualities make people great leaders, or situational factors play a role? Is leadership inborn, or is leadership really a skill that can be learned?
To accurately assess the situation, manager must well represent the capabilities of the subordinates and his own. The leader should always be ready to reevaluate judgments and, if necessary, appropriately change his leadership style. A leader who wants to work as efficiently as possible, get everything that is possible from subordinates, can not afford
…show more content…
The essence of this theory is to explain the phenomenon of leadership by outstanding personality qualities. As one of the prominent representatives of the trait theory, E. Bogardus, writes, "superior intellectual talents bring an outstanding position to individuals, sooner or later leading to leadership." The trait theory sets itself the task of revealing the universal structure of the personality of an effective leader by defining characteristic features or characteristics.
The theory of features has a number of shortcomings.
First, the list of potentially important leadership qualities turned out to be almost endless. For this reason, it became impossible to create the "only true" image of the leader.
Secondly, for various reasons, such as, for example, failure to find ways to measure many leadership qualities, and also because of the non-recognition of possible differences depending on the organization or situation, it was not possible to establish a close relationship between the considered qualities and leadership and to identify leadership in a practical way.
Behavioral
According to Sullivan and Decker (2009), leadership is influencing others into working toward accomplishing a common goal. Some people are born with an innate leadership quality within them. Others require learning leadership and management skills. It takes a certain personality trait that makes them a natural leader. Intelligence, personality, and abilities are three categories of the trait theory that is a part of the profile of successful leaders (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). I will discuss my personal views of leadership. It will
19). Still a part of the Great Man Leadership era, these trait theories just went a step further in attempting to pinpoint exactly which traits of these “great men” were consistently associated with the leaders, in an effort to more clearly define what a great leader was. This was again a further attempt to be able to identify a leader early on and predict which individuals were born to become leaders. It is thought that a major flaw with these theories was the failure to account for external factors, such as the environment in which the individuals were brought up in, as well as the situations they experienced (Horner, 2007, p. 270). Still today we do continue to study the characteristics of leaders in order to better define and understand what makes someone a good leader.
The trait theory of leadership supports the claim that some people are endowed with certain characteristics that make them more capable of being a good leader than others (Zaccaro, 2007). Trait theory can be defined as the range of qualities that can consistently differentiate a non-leader from someone who is an effective leader (Zaccaro, 2007). The difference between someone who is a great leader and someone who is a good leader is the possession of certain qualities that help establish strong leadership. One of the greatest leaders known in the sports world is John Wooden, a basketball player, and coach of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Bruins. Wooden led his team to ten national championships, seven of which were in
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
This theory is based on the premise that there are certain personality characteristics that are essential for a person to possess in order to be a leader. The main emphasis is on what the person is in terms of a constellation of personality traits. This theory searches for that set of universal leadership traits that will assure success. Numerous traits have been suggested: courage, integrity, loyalty, charisma, ambition, intelligence, honesty, clairvoyance, persistence, arrogance, health, political skill, confidence and vision.
The Trait Approach was the 1st systematic attempt to study leadership. In the 20th century it was known as the “great man” theory. This approach takes a look at the leaders personal attributes such as but not limited to: motivation, energy, intuition, creativity, persuasiveness and foresight. Some of the traits that are essential to this list include: intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity and sociability. Thus it focuses mainly on the leader and not on the followers or situations. The strengths of the Trait Approach includes: 1) it is intuitively appealing, 2) it has research to back it’s theory, 3) it highlights the leader, 4) it identifies what the traits of a leader should have and whether the traits we do
Have you ever heard someone described as "born to lead?" According to this point of view, great leaders are simply born with the necessary internal characteristics such as charisma, confidence, intelligence, and social skills that make them natural-born leaders.
If we focus on the idea that people can poses different personality and characteristics can be linked to successful leadership across various situation this would be defined as the trait theory of leadership. Some researcher believe that the ability to lead was something that a person was born with and not something that could be developed or learn. Many people still believe that leaders just have an intuition that makes them good at making decision and developing
Many would argue that leadership is innate (inborn) and that the character, style and competence needed to be a leader is infact genetic and it cannot be developed. However, others have argued that leadership is not down to genetics alone but that it can infact be developed over a period of time through environment and experiences. This is the opinion argued by Winston (Winston 2003), who says that “we are not merely the product of our genes: environment has a huge impact but in a mysterious way.” A further aspect to this question is whether leadership can be taught. There are many opinions on this matter but the “tendency is towards agreeing that, while little if anything can be taught, it can be learnt through development, growth and practise” (Gill, 2006:272).
Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing. — Warren Bennis, Ph.D. On Becoming a Leader
Trait theories accept that people receive precise qualities and traits that make them larger suited to leadership. Trait theories frequently recognize particular personality or behavioral characteristics public by leaders. If particular traits are key features of association, next how do we clarify people who own those qualities but are not leaders? This question is one of the difficulties in employing trait theories to clarify leadership.
This paper discusses on the basic concept of leadership based on trait approach theory. The establishment of relationship between leader and subordinate that focus on real changes and outcomes that reflects through shared purposes is basically leadership. In many aspects, the importance of vital without it families, communities as well as organizations would go down apart. To reach center point of goal, the leader should teach his follower to achieve better fruitful result. For this reason, the leader must be gained some characteristics to influences subordinate. This paper discusses on trait basic leadership theory based on leader qualities. This paper provides a beginning for defining leader and leadership, administrator for discussing trait approach leadership theory.
Leadership is a trait that has both fascinated me, yet eluded me for most of my life. Some say great leaders are born, I however disagree. I believe the qualities of leadership are born out of someone’s experiences, passion, and ambition.
Leadership is an essential quality for all managers. However, it is true that leadership is also one of the biggest shortcomings seen in managers. Some managers merely view their job description as completing tasks, but really management focuses on how the tasks are completed. Mastering this concept cannot be done very easily, which is a reason why so many managers lack effective leadership qualities.
Throughout history there have been numerous leaders who changed the course of the world, whether through conquest or innovation, having the vision and ability to stand at the front of their people and guide them to the future. Yet one must only look at the past to see that for every successful leader there were several who failed at some point in their course, lacking some qualities contained within their more well known peers. Analyzing the most well known leaders of history has led me to believe that the three most important characteristics of leadership are the abilities to delegate tasks, communicate well, and inspire.